Re: Problem with Mac OS X x86 32-bit: LilyPond 2.23.0-1

Le 17/03/2021 à 00:24, Jacques Menu a écrit : Hello, I’m using Mac OS X Mojave 10.14.6 (32 bits), and I get this message when launching this version, which I just download from Lily’s web site at https://lilypond.org/development.html <https://lilypond.org/development.html> :

Problem with Mac OS X x86 32-bit: LilyPond 2.23.0-1

Hello, I’m using Mac OS X Mojave 10.14.6 (32 bits), and I get this message when launching this version, which I just download from Lily’s web site at https://lilypond.org/development.html : dyld: Library not loaded: @executable_path/../lib/libintl.8.dylib Referenced from: /var/folders/jc

Re: 2.21.3 build problem on Mac OS X Mojave

Thanks a lot Werner, works like a charm! JM > Le 19 juil. 2020 à 09:11, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > > > >> In fact I did the ‘git clone’ afresh, moving aside previous >> attempts. Thus the contents of ‘build’ on both OSes is the result of >> the commands I showed, up to '../configure'. >> >>

Re: 2.21.3 build problem on Mac OS X Mojave

> In fact I did the ‘git clone’ afresh, moving aside previous > attempts. Thus the contents of ‘build’ on both OSes is the result of > the commands I showed, up to '../configure'. > > That’s why I don’t get what happens… For me, using an up-to-date MacPorts system, compilation of LilyPond from

Re: 2.21.3 build problem on Mac OS X Mojave

: >> >> >>> I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and >>> Mac OS X 10.14.6 (Mojave). On the latter, I installed Apple’s >>> XCode, the needed tools in /opt with MacPorts, and the needed fonts >>> in /opt/local/share/fonts/urw-

Re: 2.21.3 build problem on Mac OS X Mojave

BERG a écrit : > > >> I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and >> Mac OS X 10.14.6 (Mojave). On the latter, I installed Apple’s >> XCode, the needed tools in /opt with MacPorts, and the needed fonts >> in /opt/local/share/fonts/urw-cor

Re: 2.21.3 build problem on Mac OS X Mojave

> I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and > Mac OS X 10.14.6 (Mojave). On the latter, I installed Apple’s > XCode, the needed tools in /opt with MacPorts, and the needed fonts > in /opt/local/share/fonts/urw-core35-fonts. You might apply https://github.

Re: 2.21.3 build problem on Mac OS X Mojave

Hi, Am Samstag, den 18.07.2020, 15:14 +0200 schrieb Jacques Menu: > Hello folks, > > I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and Mac OS X > 10.14.6 (Mojave). > On the latter, I installed Apple’s XCode, the needed tools in /opt with > MacPorts, and t

2.21.3 build problem on Mac OS X Mojave

Hello folks, I’m trying to build LilyPond 2.21.3 locally, both on Debian 9 and Mac OS X 10.14.6 (Mojave). On the latter, I installed Apple’s XCode, the needed tools in /opt with MacPorts, and the needed fonts in /opt/local/share/fonts/urw-core35-fonts. Performing the same ‘git clone’ and the

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 30 May 2020, at 12:41, Wim van Dommelen wrote: > > > But when I then browse around a little bit to get some feeling of what this > platform is, whether it is something I could use, I see a button "Pricing" > ($150/month?, Open Source registration in the bottom), "Sign in", "Start your > fr

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 30 May 2020, at 11:15, Mats Behre wrote: > > Perhaps using an installer (or putting lilypond in /opt) prevents the need to > explicitly allowing the application to run, but as you can see from below I > can run it from e.g. Downloads. When downloading the Stockfish chess binaries with S

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 30 May 2020, at 11:15, Mats Behre wrote: > > On 2020-05-30 10:27, Hans Åberg wrote: >>> On 30 May 2020, at 10:14, Mats Behre wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-05-29 20:18, Hans Åberg wrote: For an editor app, Frescobaldi is much better, and it runs lilypond externally, and for 2.21, ther

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

self, I'am to pay for this platform >> >> Has LilyPond come so far now?, When will it be ready to be sold out and >> split for other people's profit? >> >> Regards, >> Wim. >> >>> On 29 May 2020, at 19:43 , Karlin High wrote:

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> is almost impossible > - when I register myself, I'am to pay for this platform > > Has LilyPond come so far now?, When will it be ready to be sold out and split > for other people's profit? > > Regards, > Wim. > > >> On 29 May 2020, at 19:43

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 2020-05-30 10:27, Hans Åberg wrote: On 30 May 2020, at 10:14, Mats Behre wrote: On 2020-05-29 20:18, Hans Åberg wrote: For an editor app, Frescobaldi is much better, and it runs lilypond externally, and for 2.21, there is the installer that I just posted about [1], which does not requir

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

At least one (the newest in the list) workes for me. Apparantly some of the links are broken by insertion of strange characters after which Catalina completly blocks running it because of a security issue. Thanks for this list! Regards, Wim. > On 29 May 2020, at 20:41 , Karlin High wrote: >

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 30 May 2020, at 10:14, Mats Behre wrote: > > On 2020-05-29 20:18, Hans Åberg wrote: >> For an editor app, Frescobaldi is much better, and it runs lilypond >> externally, and for 2.21, there is the installer that I just posted about >> [1], which does not require MacPorts, or the MacPorts

Re: Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 2020-05-29 20:39, Wim van Dommelen wrote: I've seen this setup. It has (at least) two problems: - most of the links are broken, trying to do a straightforward download is almost impossible - when I register myself, I'am to pay for this platform That is strange, I was able to

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 5/29/2020 1:39 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: most of the links are broken, trying to do a straightforward download is almost impossible Sorry, I should have checked further. Do the links on this other page work for you? -- Karlin High Mis

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

to be sold out and split for other people's profit? Regards, Wim. > On 29 May 2020, at 19:43 , Karlin High wrote: > > On 5/29/2020 11:29 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: >> Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for >> the new Mac OS X

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 29 May 2020, at 18:29, Wim van Dommelen wrote: > > Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for > the new Mac OS X 10.15.4 "Catalina" version? > > As an end-user now (but with more than 25 years of software experience, a lot &

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 5/29/2020 11:29 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for the new Mac OS X 10.15.4 "Catalina" version? Yes: Marnen Laibow-Koser has produced this. <https://bintray.com/marnen/lilypond-darwin-64> I haven't

Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for the new Mac OS X 10.15.4 "Catalina" version? As an end-user now (but with more than 25 years of software experience, a lot of mainframe and Unix hours spend in systems programming, now retired), I liked the

Re: Intel Mac OS X 10.8.5 - LilyPond Prefs

Thanks for your replies. Kieran is correct inasmuch I am using the Mac OS X app. I didn't realize that the LilyPond preferences were only for the editor. That's not what OS X preferences usually limit themselves to. IAC that's OK with me as I don't use the LilyPond built in ed

Re: Intel Mac OS X 10.8.5 - LilyPond Prefs

with the Mac OS X binary of Lilypond). Good that you were able to guess… Cheers, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Intel Mac OS X 10.8.5 - LilyPond Prefs

Hi Simon, > are you referring to Frescobaldi? Lilypond, being a command line program, > doesn’t have a GUI nor any menus, in which entries could be greyed out… He’s talking about “Lilypad” (or whatever they call the minimal editor that comes with the Mac OS X binary of Lilypond).

Re: Intel Mac OS X 10.8.5 - LilyPond Prefs

Hello Peter, are you referring to Frescobaldi? Lilypond, being a command line program, doesn’t have a GUI nor any menus, in which entries could be greyed out… In case you do mean Frescobaldi, please send a report via the option provided in its Help menu. Yours, Simon Am 24.02.2015 um 19:02

Intel Mac OS X 10.8.5 - LilyPond Prefs

Hi: The LilyPond Preferences menu item is greyed out in both 2.18 & 2.19…. Is this intentional? respect… Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

2014-11-18 16:34 GMT+01:00 Tim McNamara : > Why not install the Frescobaldi.app bundle instead, which is installed like > any Mac app? Indeed, if you don't need the newest features of Frescobaldi at the moment. See the thread starting at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-06/ms

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

ys "no such file..." > > Sorry if my question seems dumb, I am obviously not very literate with > computers... > > Thanks! > > Silvan. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

do python setup.py install" At this point, if I try to run these commands, it says "no such file..." Sorry if my question seems dumb, I am obviously not very literate with computers... Thanks! Silvan. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecob

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

o do before I run the next two commands : >> "python setup.py build" and "sudo python setup.py install" >> At this point, if I try to run these commands, it says "no such file..." >> >> Sorry if my question seems dumb, I am obviously not very litera

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

"no such file..." > > Sorry if my question seems dumb, I am obviously not very literate with > computers... > > Thanks! > > Silvan. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://li

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

r-qt4-0.16.3.tar.gz [...] You're probably following some old instructions. Please instead use these: https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/How-to-install-Frescobaldi-on-Mac-OS-X (available also in French and Italian). Best wishes. Davide ___ lily

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

o python setup.py install" At this point, if I try to run these commands, it says "no such file..." Sorry if my question seems dumb, I am obviously not very literate with computers... Thanks! Silvan. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.n

Re: Installation instructions for Frescobaldi on Mac OS X

Fantastic work. Thanks! Wilbert --  Wilbert Berendsen (www.wilbertberendsen.nl) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Installation instructions for Frescobaldi on Mac OS X

Dear all, the installation instructions for Frescobaldi on Mac OS X have been updated. You can find them in the wiki of Frescobaldi's GitHub repository: https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki (The French translation will hopefully be updated soon.) The instructions have been reorganize

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

+1 -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p147797.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Yes, but Mac OS X Darwin does not use apt as far as I know, only Debian and > Debian derived systems such as Ubuntu and Mint. > > As a result of this thread, I have decided the need is there for a macports > bundle for fresco

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

ral Language :: Turkish', 'Natural Language :: Ukranian', 'Operating System :: MacOS :: MacOS X', 'Operating System :: Microsoft :: Windows', 'Operating System :: POSIX', 'Programming Language :: Python :: 2.6', 'Programm

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

that project tomorrow. That'd be great! Like I wrote earlier: I built such an installer for Windows (because I have Windows on my small laptop, besides Linux) using cx_Freeze. The script is freeze.py. You could look at the setup scripts for other PyQt4 apps that include a Mac OS X installe

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

project tomorrow. This would be fantastic! Very much needed. Thanks for working on it. -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p146774.html Sent from the User mailing list arch

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Jun 6, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Tim McNamara wrote: > On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: >> Yes, but Mac OS X Darwin does not use apt as far as I know, only Debian and >> Debian derived systems such as Ubuntu and Mint. >> >> As a result of this thread, I have de

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Yes, but Mac OS X Darwin does not use apt as far as I know, only Debian and > Debian derived systems such as Ubuntu and Mint. > > As a result of this thread, I have decided the need is there for a macports > bundle for fresco

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:59 PM, flup2 wrote: > Hello, > > While reading your error message, it seems that the python version used is > the one included in OS X (/Library/Frameworks...), not the one installed by > macports (/opt/local...) > > To be sure that the problem lies there, here are a few ste

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Yes, but Mac OS X Darwin does not use apt as far as I know, only Debian and Debian derived systems such as Ubuntu and Mint. As a result of this thread, I have decided the need is there for a macports bundle for frescobaldi, one that includes all the dependencies with no headaches. This seems

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

t; /Applications/frescobaldi/frescobaldi (the first "frescobaldi is the >>> folder name, the second one is the binary itself). >> >> I've added more explanation of this to the wiki page, along with some other >> minor edits and typo fixes: >> https://gi

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

/python2.7 setup.py install Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p146748.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing lis

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Greetings, > > On 6/06/13 10:13 AM, Tim McNamara wrote: >> Installing Frescobaldi remains one of the singularly frustrating interludes >> of my computing life. I cannot figure out how anyone gets a damned thing >> done using Linux/BSD with all

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Greetings, > > On 6/06/13 10:13 AM, Tim McNamara wrote: >> Installing Frescobaldi remains one of the singularly frustrating interludes >> of my computing life. I cannot figure out how anyone gets a damned thing >> done using Linux/BSD with a

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Greetings, On 6/06/13 10:13 AM, Tim McNamara wrote: Installing Frescobaldi remains one of the singularly frustrating interludes of my computing life. I cannot figure out how anyone gets a damned thing done using Linux/BSD with all the asinine dependency issues, even with package managers. I

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

baldi (the first "frescobaldi is the >> folder name, the second one is the binary itself). > > I've added more explanation of this to the wiki page, along with some other > minor edits and typo fixes: > https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Frescobaldi-Mac-OS-X-ins

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Op Mon, 27 May 2013 20:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Derek schreef: > Seems to be working now. Thank you very very much to everyone who > took the time to detail this process it is greatly appreciated. Great that it works! Best wishes, Wilbert -- Wilbert Berendsen (http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl) _

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Para los que no sabemos mucho de informática y seguimos los pasos "copiano y pegando" (copy/paste) creo que hay un pequeño fallo que nos trae de cabeza al instalar python-poppler-qt4-0.16.3. en la dirección completa: /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/python2.7/set

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Normally, the sip step (along with other dependencies) is included in the pyqt install via macports. That's why I did not mention it. Philippe Le 28 mai 2013 à 13:57, Andrew Bernard a écrit : > You definitely need to include the sip install step in the guide. > > Andrew > > On 28/05/13 1:

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

You definitely need to include the sip install step in the guide. Andrew On 28/05/13 1:42 PM, Paul Morris wrote: Hmmm, I remember running into the "No module named sip" problem back when I was trying to install the dependencies manually. When I switched to using MacPorts I installed python usi

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

On 28 May 2013 13:42, Paul Morris wrote: > > Hmmm, I remember running into the "No module named sip" problem back when I > was trying to install the dependencies manually. When I switched to using > MacPorts I installed python using it (following the instructions on the > Frescobaldi site), which

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

69038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p146389.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Seems to be working now. Thank you very very much to everyone who took the time to detail this process it is greatly appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p146388.html Sent from the User mailing list

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Aha! A couple of things. I am principally a heavy Linux user, so I have skipped the step to make an installer, preferring to run from the command line. After clearing out a previous manual attempt to install frescobaldi for mac a few months ago, I found this: You need to add python sip to th

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

-- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p146386.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

local. All libraries are under /opt, not /Library. Running Mac OS X 10.8.3, MacPorts 2.1.3. Is this a python setup or configuration issue? The point being, the guide must still be incomplete in some way. Andrew On 28/05/13 2:48 AM, Paul Morris wrote: flup2 wrote I don't "inst

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

one is the binary itself). I've added more explanation of this to the wiki page, along with some other minor edits and typo fixes: https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Frescobaldi-Mac-OS-X-install-guide Today I was able to upgrade my frescobaldi to 2.0.10 with the help of this guide.

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

f). Perhaps it will also solve your pyqt error Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p146361.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypo

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

on/2.7/site-packages/PyQt4/QtCore.so Reason: image not found This on Mac OS X 10.8.3. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

This is great, and most appreciated. But there is a section that is not at all clear: Download Frescobaldi and place it in the Applications folder I can only find a source tarball for Frescobaldi and it is not obvious how to place it in the Applications folder, since there is a python setu

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Philippe, thanks a lot! I've put it on a wiki page, and linked from the frescobaldi website. Op Tue, 14 May 2013 05:10:25 -0700 (PDT) flup2 schreef: > Hello all, > > Here is a step by step guide to install Frescobaldi on a Mac OS X > system. Frescobaldi has some known iss

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

/main.py", line 26, in import sip ImportError: No module named sip Any ideas? thanks -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p145923.html Sent from the User mailing list a

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

di and its dependencies are completely separated for that matter. Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frecobaldi-2-Mac-OS-X-install-guide-tp145898p145917.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

flup2 wrote > Here is a step by step guide to install Frescobaldi on a Mac OS X system. > > I hope to have some time to make this easier to read (and, why not, > include it to Frescobaldi website) Philippe, Thanks for this guide! It would definitely be good to have it on the

Re: Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, flup2 wrote: > Here is a step by step guide to install Frescobaldi on a Mac OS X system. Thanks!! I'll check it out tonight. If it works, perhaps I can 'entice' the conductor of our choir to convert to Lilpypond! C

Frecobaldi 2 Mac OS X install guide

Hello all, Here is a step by step guide to install Frescobaldi on a Mac OS X system. Frescobaldi has some known issues on a mac (see below) but after these steps you should be able to: - use Frescobaldi (of course) - launch Frescobaldi with a double clickable icon - play MIDI * install macports

Re: Frescobaldi installation on Mac OS X (was: Re: Frescobaldi install)

py2app seems quite difficult to setup on a mac. I tried pyinstaller, but that's for now beyond my capabilites. Perhaps someone with more Python knowledge could try to build a mac binary using that way. Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frescobaldi

Re: Frescobaldi installation on Mac OS X (was: Re: Frescobaldi install)

Oh, wow - I had no idea about that bug. Honestly, in my experience, Frescobaldi has always been near-instant loading and wicked fast in usage - but thanks for the heads up! :) Ben Wilbert Berendsen-4 wrote > There is a recent, confirmed PyQt4 bug that caused very large delays in > Frescobaldi,

Frescobaldi installation on Mac OS X (was: Re: Frescobaldi install)

There is a recent, confirmed PyQt4 bug that caused very large delays in Frescobaldi, but 2.0.9 will run fine regardless, even with PyQt-4.9.6 or 4.10, allbeit slightly slower. I'd very happy if someone with an Apple machine could create a good, easily installable Frescobaldi package (maybe wit

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Dec 12, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Paul Morris wrote: > I tried to follow those instructions recently (to try the png output) but was > not able to get it to run. For future command-line beginners like myself, I figured out the problem: I needed to change the shell I was using from tcsh to bash.

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

mber 2012 00:25, Paul Morris wrote: > On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote: > > > I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X > > (my case: 10.6.8) terminal > > Instructions are here: > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/we

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Parham Fazelzadeh wrote: > I have tried searching for the answer online [...] > thank you so much. I feel stupid now, can't believe I missed that. I guess my > eyes were looking for the word "terminal". Also, I would have maybe expected > that information to also

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

g system >>> >>> There is a Filesystem Hierarchy Standard >>> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard >> >> Right, like hier(1) describes. FHS looks to be rather Linux-specific. >> Correct me

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On 12 Dec 2012, at 21:16, Eric Pancer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin >> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond. > > Please, no! > > From man 1 hier >

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

t; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard > > Right, like hier(1) describes. FHS looks to be rather Linux-specific. > Correct me if I'm wrong. Linux is a strictly speaking a kernel, like Mac OS X is running the kernel Mach, often combined with what is called GN

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 12 Dec 2012, at 21:16, Eric Pancer wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin >>> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond.

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > The whole point was _not_ to have it added to the PATH as it was > supposed to _only_ contain binaries used _internally_ in LilyPond. Ah! Sorry, I'll smack my own forehead :-) ___ lilypond-user ma

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

Eric Pancer writes: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Eric Pancer writes: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Eric Pancer writes: > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about >>> /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables are not in /bin but >>> some

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

Eric Pancer writes: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about >> /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables are not in /bin but >> some bin (well, actually out/bin) and, after installation, in some

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Which is pretty much what we are talking about. I was not talking about > /libexec but libexec, like the LilyPond executables are not in /bin but > some bin (well, actually out/bin) and, after installation, in some > /usr/local/bin (so the c

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

Eric Pancer writes: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin >> just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond. > > Please, no! > >>From man 1 hier > > [..] > libexec/ system

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin > just for executables supposed to be entry points of LilyPond. Please, no! >From man 1 hier [..] libexec/ system daemons & system utilities (execute

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:14:12PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > The executable shims avoid those problems, while being relatively easy > > to explain to newbies. > > The libexec route appears to cater for all of that. We should use bin > just for executables suppo

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

Graham Percival writes: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:47:27PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote: >> >> On 12 Dec 2012, at 16:32, David Kastrup wrote: >> > Stupid question: why would one create executable shims to something like >> > DIR/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/* in ~/bin and then add ~/bin to >

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:47:27PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote: > > On 12 Dec 2012, at 16:32, David Kastrup wrote: > > Stupid question: why would one create executable shims to something like > > DIR/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/* in ~/bin and then add ~/bin to > > one's PATH when one can just

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On 12 Dec 2012, at 16:32, David Kastrup wrote: > Paul Morris writes: > >> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote: >> >>> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X >>> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal >> >> Instruction

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:32 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Paul Morris writes: > >> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote: >> >>> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X >>> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal >> >> Instr

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:32 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Paul Morris writes: > >> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote: >> >>> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X >>> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal >> >> Instruction

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

Paul Morris writes: > On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote: > >> I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X >> (my case: 10.6.8) terminal > > Instructions are here: > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/web/macos-x >

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Parham FH wrote: > I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X > (my case: 10.6.8) terminal Instructions are here: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/web/macos-x "Running on the command-line"

Re: Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Parham FH wrote: > I tried asking on IRC but got no replies. > I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X > (my case: 10.6.8) terminal since I am > generating the data for lilypond via a python application. > It would therefor

Lilypond in Mac OS X Terminal

Hello, I tried asking on IRC but got no replies. I am curious if it is possible to run lilypond from the Mac OS X (my case: 10.6.8) terminal since I am generating the data for lilypond via a python application. It would therefor be preferred to run lilypond from the terminal in an automated

Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: Help needed creating a Mac OS X installer for Frescobaldi

On Saturday, June 16, 2012 6:49:01 AM UTC-3, Rodolfo Zitellini wrote: > > If you want I can send you the script to generate the app bundle > Yes, please! Do you think downloading Qt for Mac (and installing manually) would solve the issues? Or maybe building it from scratch using brew

  1   2   3   4   >