On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > The whole point was _not_ to have it added to the PATH as it was > supposed to _only_ contain binaries used _internally_ in LilyPond.
Ah! Sorry, I'll smack my own forehead :-) _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
