Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 16:57 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > David Sumbler writes: > > > What I don't understand is why I need both the 8th-note and 16th- > > note > > entries.  The name "beamExceptions" implies that one only needs to > > specif

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

What I don't understand is why I need both the 8th-note and 16th-note entries.  The name "beamExceptions" implies that one only needs to specify the exceptional beaming - but the 16th note version is already the default.  Is it the case that if /any/ exception is described,

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

David Sumbler writes: > What I don't understand is why I need both the 8th-note and 16th-note > entries.  The name "beamExceptions" implies that one only needs to > specify the exceptional beaming - but the 16th note version is already > the default.  Is it the ca

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 15:25 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > David Sumbler writes: > > > I am setting a piece in 2/4 time.  Lilypond's default beaming > > pattern > > is to break beams at the mid-bar point, which is what one would > > generally expect.  However, I

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

David Sumbler writes: > I am setting a piece in 2/4 time.  Lilypond's default beaming pattern > is to break beams at the mid-bar point, which is what one would > generally expect.  However, I would like it to use a single beam for > the whole bar if, and only if, the bar cons

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

On 24/11/2024 13:50, David Sumbler wrote: \version "2.24.3" \language "english" \new Staff \relative {   \time 2/4   \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/4)   \set Timing.beatStructure = 1,1   \set Timing.beamExceptions = #'()   \set Timing.beamExceptions = \beamExceptions { 8[ 8 8 8] } c

Automatic beaming behaviour

I am setting a piece in 2/4 time.  Lilypond's default beaming pattern is to break beams at the mid-bar point, which is what one would generally expect.  However, I would like it to use a single beam for the whole bar if, and only if, the bar consists of 4 quavers/half- notes. Of course

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

On 2024-11-07 12:06, Richard Gress - rgress(a)nd.edu wrote: Jason, the new commands as presented in the 2.25 docs makes more sense than in 2.24, and doesn't require timing commands - bravo to you and whoever else worked on this. Thank you! The English instructions have a few grammatical error

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

Thank you for guiding me in the right direction with manual beaming, Leo. When embarking on the project with this piece, I was aware that many manual overrides would be necessary, but didn't know that one was possible in this case because I went straight to the "Subdivided Beaming&q

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

On 2024-11-06 23:35, Leo Correia de Verdier - leo.correia.de.verdier(a)gmail.com wrote: What is needed is for the secondary beam (the sixteenth beam) to be broken between each quintuplet group in the first measure of the left hand. It looks like this won't be possible at the moment. I am still

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

Jason Yip writes: >> % Here is where the problem occurs. We're in 9/8 time. >>   \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 3/32) >>   \set beatStructure = 2,2,2,2 % Whatever I set this to does > > Did you try running the latest development version of Lilypond? I have > attached the output of y

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

What is needed is for the secondary beam (the sixteenth beam) to be broken between each quintuplet group in the first measure of the left hand. > 7 nov. 2024 kl. 06:11 skrev Jason Yip : > > On 2024-11-06 10:57, Richard Gress - rgress(a)nd.edu wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> I'm engraving a measure o

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

The subdivision works well without the manual beaming (the square brackets), but as Carl says it’s probably impossible to subdivide just the secondary beam automatically at non-powers-of-a-half: % \relative c { \time 9/8 \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 2:05 PM Richard Gress wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm engraving a measure of Sorabji's First Symphony for Organ. In the left > hand part, beams should be subdivided each dotted sixteenth note. However, > the current behavior is that the beams are subdivided every beat (3 eigh

Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

Hi everyone, I'm engraving a measure of Sorabji's First Symphony for Organ. In the left hand part, beams should be subdivided each dotted sixteenth note. However, the current behavior is that the beams are subdivided every beat (3 eighth notes in 9/8 time.) Here's my example. I will trim it dow

Re: Beaming error

sage- > From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org > On Behalf Of Richard > Davis > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 10:32 AM > To: Lilypond User > Subject: Beaming error > > Hello all! > > I came across something quite strange today that I co

RE: Beaming error

t unfold 8 c'32 \repeat unfold 4 c'32 \tuplet 3/2 { c'16 16 16 } c'8 \repeat unfold 4 c'32 } Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org On Behalf Of Richard Davis Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 10:32 AM To: Lilypond

Beaming error

Hello all! I came across something quite strange today that I couldn't quite wrap my head around. Why does this code: \version "2.25.17" \language "english" { \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8) \set beatStructure = 2,2,2,2 \tuplet 3/2 { c'16 16 16 } \rep

Re: beaming of eighth note question for 4/4

As far as I can understand, the automatic beaming algorithm is not clever enough to be able to handle the requested behavior, i.e. to distinguish between full groups of 4 8th notes and patterns like "r8 c c c". I'm afraid that it would be fai

Re: beaming of eighth note question for 4/4

The way to change the beaming behaviour in LilyPond is described at: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/setting-automatic-beam-behavior For the case of quavers in 4/4 time, Gould starts with the grouping used in the LilyPond default, but also suggests (page 154) situations

Re: beaming of eighth note question for 4/4

of this MWE but the Lilypond default seems to be like the first line. Is there a beaming setting way to get the 2nd behavior. I have looked for a solution in NR 1.2.4. I don't have a copy of Gould to look this up. TIA for any ideas, Paul

beaming of eighth note question for 4/4

Much printed music that I try to duplicate seems to be beamed like the 2nd line of this MWE but the Lilypond default seems to be like the first line. Is there a beaming setting way to get the 2nd behavior. I have looked for a solution in NR 1.2.4. I don't have a copy of Gould to look th

Re: Question about beaming and timing count

Dear Carl, For both examples, the difference is the example writes "\tuplet 5/8" instead of "5/4" telling lilypond to put 5 notes in the space of 8 (which is not how people usually write 5-tuplets). -William On 6/7/24 10:56, Carl Witthoft wrote: Please take a look at these three snippets, f

Re: Control beaming with tuplets

Perfect, thanks a lot! Best, Kenneth Xavier Scheuer, May 24, 2024 at 12:41: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 10:57, Kenneth Flak > <[1]kennethf...@protonmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks! That almost did the trick. The only thing that's not working is that > connecting beam between the two quintuplets. S

Re: Control beaming with tuplets

On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 10:57, Kenneth Flak wrote: > > Thanks! That almost did the trick. The only thing that's not working is that connecting beam between the two quintuplets. See attached screenshot... Hello, \set subdivideBeams = ##t And then either, for 2.24: \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-mo

Re: Control beaming with tuplets

gt; > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to replicate the notation in originalHarp.png for harp with > > 5-tuplets, but the beaming I am getting is completely off... My attempt is > > in the file myAttempt.png, using this code: > > > > right = { > >

Re: Control beaming with tuplets

\tuplet 5/4 ? D > On 24 May 2024, at 09:44, Kenneth Flak wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to replicate the notation in originalHarp.png for harp with > 5-tuplets, but the beaming I am getting is completely off... My attempt is in > the file myAttempt.png, u

Control beaming with tuplets

Hi, I'm trying to replicate the notation in originalHarp.png for harp with 5-tuplets, but the beaming I am getting is completely off... My attempt is in the file myAttempt.png, using this code: right = { \relative c'{ s4 \tuplet 5/2 {c32 e g bf df} \tuplet 5/2 {c32 e g bf d

Re: Auto-beaming

Hi, > > I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing > > four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should > > use Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? > > I was wonderning if in the end you found a solution. I would like to > do

Re: Auto-beaming

Hi, > I'm currently writing some sheet music in 2/4. I'd like measures containing > four eights to be all beamed together, but everything except that should use > Lilypond's default rules. How can I achieve this? I was wonderning if in the end you found a solution. I would like to do the same a

Re: nested beaming

> On 11 Apr 2024, at 17:14, Carl Sorensen wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 6:44 AM Hans Åberg wrote: >> >> > On 10 Apr 2024, at 16:54, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 10:23 AM Hans Åberg wrote: >> > >> >> In the past, it was possible to give 9/16 the beat structur

Re: nested beaming

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 6:44 AM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > On 10 Apr 2024, at 16:54, Carl Sorensen > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 10:23 AM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > >> In the past, it was possible to give 9/16 the beat structure [[2 2] [2 > 3]], as a 2/4 with an extra 1/16 at the end, like

Re: nested beaming

> On 10 Apr 2024, at 23:29, Carl Sorensen wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:02 PM Hans Åberg wrote: >> >> There is actually one example of a naturally occurring meter, meaning it is >> used regularly, where such a sub-beaming might be useful, namely, a f

Re: nested beaming

> On 10 Apr 2024, at 16:54, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 10:23 AM Hans Åberg wrote: > >> In the past, it was possible to give 9/16 the beat structure [[2 2] [2 3]], >> as a 2/4 with an extra 1/16 at the end, like in the Bulgarian Daichovo, but >> currently it is only poss

Re: nested beaming

> On 10 Apr 2024, at 23:29, Carl Sorensen wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:02 PM Hans Åberg wrote: >> >> >> There is actually one example of a naturally occurring meter, meaning it is >> used regularly, where such a sub-beaming might be useful, na

Re: nested beaming

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:02 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > There is actually one example of a naturally occurring meter, meaning it > is used regularly, where such a sub-beaming might be useful, namely, a form > of the Čoček in 9/8, 9 = 2+2+2+3, where 3 = 1+2. I wrote it as 2+2+

Re: nested beaming

me 7/16 > >\set beatStructure = 4,3 > >\repeat unfold 7 a'16 > > } > > This works for the 9=(2+2)+(2+3); I attach a file that compiles, in case you > want to check. I need to check the 7/16 later. One could also have the 3 in > other places. like 9 = (2+

Re: nested beaming

[Adding back to list] On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:23 AM Paul Scott wrote: > Version 2.25.14 > > Are there parameters to change? It would seem that there would several > possibilities even though I got the one I wanted this time. > > Paul > > > You can read about the parameters in the 2.25 Notatio

Re: nested beaming

is works for the 9=(2+2)+(2+3); I attach a file that compiles, in case > you want to check. I need to check the 7/16 later. One could also have the > 3 in other places. like 9 = (2+2)+(3+2) or (3+2)+(2+2). They exist in > Turkey and Macedonia in slower forms without the sub-beaming, but

Re: nested beaming

gt; But this has not yet been implemented? > > So is the issue that you would like to have the final [2 3] beamed with a > pair of beamed 16th notes joined to a trio of beamed sixteenth notes by a > single beam? Yes. > I could see that such a notation might be easy to read, but it

Re: nested beaming

that I do not remember. The new interface is much simpler, so I felt it was not a crucial point. One sees sheet music with the beaming division 9 = 4+2+3. Bela Bartok used this meter, and it may have that latter written meter and beaming.

Re: nested beaming

ns manual intervention is needed > besides defining baseMoment etc. > > But this has not yet been implemented? > So is the issue that you would like to have the final [2 3] beamed with a pair of beamed 16th notes joined to a trio of beamed sixteenth notes by a single beam? I could se

Re: nested beaming

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 10:23 AM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > > In the past, it was possible to give 9/16 the beat structure [[2 2] [2 > 3]], as a 2/4 with an extra 1/16 at the end, like in the Bulgarian > Daichovo, but currently it is only possible with [4 2 3] as in: > \time 9/16 > \set beatStructu

Re: Fwd: nested beaming

ssage Subject:Re: nested beaming Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:26:22 -0700 From: Paul Scott To: Carl Sorensen On 4/8/24 3:59 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:51 PM Carl Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:14 AM Paul Scott wrote: The

Fwd: nested beaming

Forgot to send to list. Forwarded Message Subject:Re: nested beaming Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:26:22 -0700 From: Paul Scott To: Carl Sorensen On 4/8/24 3:59 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:51 PM Carl Sorensen wrote: On Mon

Re: nested beaming

> On 8 Apr 2024, at 18:46, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote: >> Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write >> this now incorrect code: >> >> a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]] i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined by a >> single beam.

Re: nested beaming

Samra Subject: Re: nested beaming On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:51 PM Carl Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:14 AM Paul Scott wrote: The case at the moment is with long groups of triplets of which the following is now a part: {    \time 2/4    \tuplet 3/2 8 { a'

Re: nested beaming

time 2/4 >>\tuplet 3/2 8 { >> a'16 16 \set stemRightBeamCount = 1 16 \set stemLeftBeamCount = 1 >> 16 16 16 >>} >> } >> >> I think that after last summer's GSOC project on beaming, this now works >> correctly out of the box: > >

Re: nested beaming

1 > 16 16 16 >} > } > > I think that after last summer's GSOC project on beaming, this now works > correctly out of the box: \version "2.24" { \time 2/4 \set subdivideBeams = ##t \tuplet 3/2 8 { a'16 16 16 16 16 16 } } HTH, Carl

Re: nested beaming

On 4/8/24 9:46 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote: Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write this now incorrect code: a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined by a single beam. The question is: what i

Re: nested beaming

On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote: Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write this now incorrect code: a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined by a single beam. The question is: what is the context and why do you want this? Nor

Re: nested beaming

Le lundi 08 avril 2024 à 09:22 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit : > Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write > this now incorrect code: > > a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined > by a single beam. > > I have looked at NR 1,2,4 A litt

nested beaming

Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write this now incorrect code: a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined by a single beam. I have looked at NR 1,2,4 TIA, Paul

Re: Avoid double beaming

Hello Jogchum, you will see that \partCombine does make very basic decisions, so often you will find yourself in need to manually intervene (often this is not a question about adding slurs to each voice). In case you want to force a particular behaviour use one of the commands \partCombineApar

Re: Avoid double beaming

Op 20-02-2023 om 12:24 schreef Xavier Scheuer: On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 12:15, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: > > This gives the result I would like to see (well, almost: the first bar still has separated stems/beams, but that's nitpicking). > > I applied it to the piece the snippet was an excerpt from,

Re: Avoid double beaming

On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 12:15, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: > > This gives the result I would like to see (well, almost: the first bar still has separated stems/beams, but that's nitpicking). > > I applied it to the piece the snippet was an excerpt from, and it renders beautifully. > > Thanks a lot! Hel

Re: Avoid double beaming

Op 20-02-2023 om 11:13 schreef Xavier Scheuer: On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 10:44, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: > > Hi, > > In below snippet, lilypond renders two beams for the two voices, and, > because I want the stems to have the same direction, > the result for the 8th-notes is that they seem to be 16th

Re: Avoid double beaming

Op 20-02-2023 om 11:59 schreef Valentin Petzel: Hi Jogchum, please keep it on the list! Not for the first time I stand corrected here, apologies! The first one does exactly what it states it does, it creates two voices. The second one does what you actually want, which is a single voice featu

Re: Avoid double beaming

Hi Jogchum, please keep it on the list! The first one does exactly what it states it does, it creates two voices. The second one does what you actually want, which is a single voice featuring all notes as chords. If you have different rhythms you’ll need to combine these approaches and employ

Re: Avoid double beaming

On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 10:44, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: > > Hi, > > In below snippet, lilypond renders two beams for the two voices, and, > because I want the stems to have the same direction, > the result for the 8th-notes is that they seem to be 16th notes. > > Is there a way to avoid this, and to

Re: Avoid double beaming

Hi Jogchum, the reason for your issues is that you are using voice 2 (i.e. lowest voice) with a \stemUp, which will cause issues to resolve collision. Generally you should avoid using \stemUp and \stemDown unless you really need to use it and rather use the correct Voice. If you were to use \v

Avoid double beaming

Hi, In below snippet, lilypond renders two beams for the two voices, and, because I want the stems to have the same direction, the result for the 8th-notes is that they seem to be 16th notes. Is there a way to avoid this, and to join the two beams to one? Thanks in advance!, regards, Jogchum

Re: Beaming question

Thank you! Both these examples helped! I ended up using the \beatstructure because I realized I had to do it for the whole measure. -Molly On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 2:09 PM James.Correa wrote: > > I think this is what you are looking for: > > \version "2.22.2" > > \score { > \absolute { > > \tup

Re: Beaming question

I think this is what you are looking for: \version "2.22.2" \score { \absolute { \tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 [ c'' \once \set stemRightBeamCount = #1 f'' } \once \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1 c'' f'' ) ] | %m67 } } --- James Correa Composer - guitarist - sound designer http://www.jamescorrea.net http:/

Re: Beaming question

Hi Molly, you can subdivide beams. F. ex.: \score { \absolute { \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8) \set beatStructure = 2,2,2,2 \tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 c''f'' } c''f''

Beaming question

I am working with a texture of triplet 16ths that occasionally are duple 16ths. I am wondering if there is a way to turn the beam into a single beam between the second f'' in the triplet to the c'' in the below example. I'm not sure what that's called and couldn't find it in the notation manual. It

Re: How to get cross-staff beaming? Should be automatic; it's not. Why?

Hi Mark; I'm sorry for the long delay in responding to you. I appreciate your assistance in adding manual beaming to my code to get me started on the right path. Thanks, Ken On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 8:45 PM Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > > Kenneth, > > The auto beaming

RE: How to get cross-staff beaming? Should be automatic; it's not. Why?

Kenneth, The auto beaming can be overridden using [..]. Look up "manual beaming" in the docs. Stem direction can be changed with \stemUp and \stemDown. Attached is a start. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gn

Re: How to get cross-staff beaming? Should be automatic; it's not. Why?

Thanks Aaron. The first suggestion seemed to do absolutely nothing to change the appearance of the beaming (I'm bewildered), but the second suggestion worked. Ken On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 7:45 PM Aaron Hill wrote: > > On 2022-07-31 7:10 pm, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > How

Re: How to get cross-staff beaming? Should be automatic; it's not. Why?

On 2022-07-31 7:10 pm, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: However, the current incarnation of my Swan Lake harp part (one bar so far), does not have a complete beam (only each triplet has a beam). I thought that this would be automatic. In 4/4 time, there is a default beam exception for "twelfth" notes.

Re: Positioning lyrics properly with beaming?

Should have known better. I can’t reproduce what I did. AFAIK, phrasing brackets don’t exist. Sorry for the noise. Stan > On Jul 21, 2022, at 1:52 PM, Kevin Cole wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 2:36 PM Stan Sanderson > wrote: > >> or, quick and dirty, “phrasing

Re: Positioning lyrics properly with beaming?

" should extend over the dotted half >> note and the 8th note that follows, and "The" should appear under the >> 16th note. It behaves correctly if I remove the beaming, but, as >> mentioned above, there's a lot of it and I'm trying (once again) to >> stay

Re: Positioning lyrics properly with beaming?

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 2:33 PM William Rehwinkel via LilyPond user discussion wrote: > > Hey Kevin, > > I found that the command to disable all logic for finding melismas (manual > beams when \autoBeamOff, slurs, etc.) is melismaBusyProperties = #'() . Refer > to the attached example which sets

Re: Positioning lyrics properly with beaming?

y> >> but I'm still missing something. >> >> A small example below. The "Ohhh" should extend over the dotted half >> note and the 8th note that follows, and "The" should appear under the >> 16th note. It behaves correctly if I remove the beam

Re: Positioning lyrics properly with beaming?

lypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/learning/aligning-lyrics-to-a-melody but I'm still missing something. A small example below. The "Ohhh" should extend over the dotted half note and the 8th note that follows, and "The" should appear under the 16th note. It behaves correct

Positioning lyrics properly with beaming?

v2.22/Documentation/learning/aligning-lyrics-to-a-melody but I'm still missing something. A small example below. The "Ohhh" should extend over the dotted half note and the 8th note that follows, and "The" should appear under the 16th note. It behaves correctly if I remove

Re: Beaming with magnifyStaff and stopStaff

On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 7:21 PM Shane Brandes wrote: > > values greater than 1 also yield odd results. ... >> I have run into another possible-bug-certainly-ugly issue that I found >> trying to create an ossia bar. ... >> Is it a bug that I should post on the bugs list? Is there a work-around? I

Re: Beaming with magnifyStaff and stopStaff

values greater than 1 also yield odd results. On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 6:41 PM Knute Snortum wrote: > Hi all, > > I have run into another possible-bug-certainly-ugly issue that I found > trying to create an ossia bar. When a musical figure has beams and the > staff is reduced in size with magnify

Beaming with magnifyStaff and stopStaff

Hi all, I have run into another possible-bug-certainly-ugly issue that I found trying to create an ossia bar. When a musical figure has beams and the staff is reduced in size with magnifyStaff and there is a stopStaff right after it, the stems are too short and the beams are too wide. Here's a MWE

Re: About cross-staff beaming in voiceTwo

Hello, for complex cross-staff music I would suggest you to try this: https://github.com/paopre/Spontini/blob/master/documentation/tabular.md You can save much time while improving the readability of the code. Cheeers On Monday, February 28, 2022, Rip _Mus wrote: > Hello everyone, > here's

Re: About cross-staff beaming in voiceTwo

Hello, usually it is nice if you give us some Lilypond code of what you’re doing. In this case the problem is that \voiceTwo forces the stem to go down. You want to have the voice to behave like voice one in the bottom staff, so you need to do \voiceOne with the change. See this for an example

About cross-staff beaming in voiceTwo

Hello everyone, here's a problem I am encountering: [image: image.png] So, with the "\change" construct put in voiceTwo, there's no automatic kneed-beam. Also tried to override the Beam.auto-knee-gap value, but no way to obtain the knee. Hope there is a way to get what I'm looking for. Thank you

Re: Help with beaming

Le 17/12/2021 à 21:19, Paul McKay a écrit : Hi Can someone show me where I'm going wrong with the following. The piece is in 2/4. I would like the default beaming for some sections (where there are lots of eighth notes) to group them in whole bars but in sections where there are lo

Help with beaming

Hi Can someone show me where I'm going wrong with the following. The piece is in 2/4. I would like the default beaming for some sections (where there are lots of eighth notes) to group them in whole bars but in sections where there are lots of faster notes, then a beam ought only to span a qu

Re: Beaming across voices and staffs

I forgot to comment directly on this. I often find it necessary to create a temporary extra "dummy" voice to provide the continuity required for slurs, ties, and beams. Sometimes the extra notes get merged, but often one or other of them needs to be hidden if merging cannot be contrived. Pau

Re: Beaming across voices and staffs

The best/easiest solution may depend on the surrounding context. But the immediate thing that comes to mind for your limited example is: \score { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff = "up" {\clef G c''8[ \change Staff = "low" c8]} \new Staff = "low" {\clef F r8 \change Staff = "up" r8}

Re: Beaming across voices and staffs

Hi Niels, Am 17.09.21 um 12:04 schrieb Niels: See the following example: \version "2.20.0" \score {   \new PianoStaff   <<     \new Staff {\clef G c''8 r}     \new Staff {\clef F r8 c}   >> } Is it possible to have a beam between the c'' and the c when they are different voices and different

Beaming across voices and staffs

See the following example: \version "2.20.0" \score { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff {\clef G c''8 r} \new Staff {\clef F r8 c} >> } Is it possible to have a beam between the c'' and the c when they are different voices and different staves? Of course the problem can be solved usin

RE: Beaming in nested tuplets

#1 c } \tuplet 6/4 { \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1 e16 a bes f c g }}} \score { \new Staff \tune } Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Mark Probert Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2021 5:45 PM To: 'Lilypond-U

Beaming in nested tuplets

Hi, all. Can someone tell me how to break the beaming on tuplet nesting? Here is a snippet from "The Black Page" and I'd like to break the default beam connecting the three nested tuplets. Thanks .. mark. --- \version "2.22" tune = \relative c'' {

Re: Triplet beaming help

Dear Mark, You can do it easily in this way: \version "2.22" tune = \relative c'' { \clef treble r4^"A" \tuplet 3/2 { d8 d d } \tuplet 3/2 { d8 d d } d8 r8 | r4^"B" r8 \tuplet 3/2 { d8[ d d] } \tuplet 3/2 { d8[ d d] } d8 | } \score { \new Staff \tune } But I would recommend to do it as quot

RE: Triplet beaming help

-- > From: lilypond-user > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of > Mark Probert > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:16 PM > To: Lilypond-User Mailing List > Subject: Triplet beaming help > > > Dear Wisdom, > > In the following snippet the

RE: Triplet beaming help

List Subject: Triplet beaming help Dear Wisdom, In the following snippet the beaming behaviour depends on the beat structure, but I haven't found a way of making B beam in the same way as A (I want to separate the joined triplets). Any suggestions? TIA .. mark. -- \version "2

Re: Triplet beaming help

I wrote: > > -- > \version "2.22" > > tune = \relative c'' { > \clef treble > r4^"A" \tuplet 3/2 { d8 d d } \tuplet 3/2 { d8 d d } d8 r8 | \set Timing.beamExceptions = #'() \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8) \set Timing.beatStructure = 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 > r4^"B" r8 \t

Triplet beaming help

Dear Wisdom, In the following snippet the beaming behaviour depends on the beat structure, but I haven't found a way of making B beam in the same way as A (I want to separate the joined triplets). Any suggestions? TIA .. mark. -- \version "2.22" tune = \relative c'&#x

RE: Beaming in 4/4 and justify staves

Sorry! Believe it or not, I am new to mailing lists as well... Did I do it correctly now? Cristopher

Fwd: Beaming in 4/4 and justify staves

Hi Christopher, please always write to the list! Your clarification of your question is what I expected. But I don't know the answer for that. Joram Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff: Re: Beaming in 4/4 and justify staves Datum: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:39:21 -030

Re: Beaming in 4/4 and justify staves

Hi Christopher, >> 1) How can I have this beaming in 4/4 as default? see attached image. > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/automatic-and-manual-beams \version "2.20.0" \relative { \overrideTimeSignatureSettings 4/4 % whenever you use \time 4/4

Re: Beaming in 4/4 and justify staves

On 2020-04-09 1:45 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: No question is stupid – only some responses! See my post history for examples. :P -- Aaron Hill

RE: Beaming in 4/4 and justify staves

[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Cristopher Bonn Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 11:48 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Beaming in 4/4 and justify staves Hi, I am a LilyPond newbie. This has probably been asked before but I couldn't find the answer

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >