Thank you for guiding me in the right direction with manual beaming, Leo. When embarking on the project with this piece, I was aware that many manual overrides would be necessary, but didn't know that one was possible in this case because I went straight to the "Subdivided Beaming" section of the documentation.
Jason, the new commands as presented in the 2.25 docs makes more sense than in 2.24, and doesn't require timing commands - bravo to you and whoever else worked on this. The English instructions have a few grammatical errors that will need to be fixed for English readers. The example could perhaps be expanded, too. For example, users may wish to know about exactly what "respect" incomplete beams means. But I'm not familiar with software/documentation development processes. In 2.25, is it [yet] possible to set minimumBeamSubdivisionInterval to anything other than a \musiclength = X? ________________________________ From: Jason Yip <sripedia_getp...@slmail.me> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 10:54 AM To: Leo Correia de Verdier <leo.correia.de.verd...@gmail.com> Cc: Richard Gress <rgr...@nd.edu>; lilypond-user@gnu.org <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Subject: Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets On 2024-11-06 23:35, Leo Correia de Verdier - leo.correia.de.verdier(a)gmail.com wrote: > What is needed is for the secondary beam (the sixteenth beam) to be broken > between each quintuplet group in the first measure of the left hand. It looks like this won't be possible at the moment. I am still working on an update to my algorithm to be work correctly under compound meter; hope that I can deliver it soon.
