Re: Fingering brackets

Luca Fascione wrote: I'm looking for a way to make a "fingering bracket": this would be a vertical bracket on the left or right of a few simultaneous notes, to indicate they are all to be fingered with the same finger. Things to note: - I can't use the arpeggio mark, because it's not uncommon

Re: Fingering brackets

Here you go: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6736 Thanks again Werner L On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 10:01 PM Luca Fascione wrote: > Ok cool, thanks Werner. > I'll make a ticket > > L > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:38 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> >> >> > I'm looking for a way to make a

Re: Fingering brackets

Ok cool, thanks Werner. I'll make a ticket L On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:38 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> > I'm looking for a way to make a "fingering bracket": [...] > >> > >> Please file an issue, > > > > Is this not something I can code myself in Scheme? > > I don't know (Harm can certainly m

Re: Fingering brackets

>> > I'm looking for a way to make a "fingering bracket": [...] >> >> Please file an issue, > > Is this not something I can code myself in Scheme? I don't know (Harm can certainly make a better educated guess than me), but my gut feeling says that it is a hard problem, especially to get the hori

Re: Fingering brackets

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:47 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > I'm looking for a way to make a "fingering bracket": [...] > > Please file an issue, > Sure! Is this not something I can code myself in Scheme? L -- Luca Fascione

Re: Fingering brackets

> I'm looking for a way to make a "fingering bracket": [...] Please file an issue, which essentially contains your e-mail text together with the images. Werner

Re: Fingering orientations

> Oh, I see, thank you. I've realised I gave the wrong link to the page I > read that mentioned fingeringOrientations, it was in "Selected > Snippets" I can't in fact find where this variable is described... https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/learning/within_002dstaff-objects.html#fing

Re: Fingering orientations

On Sun, 2023-09-17 at 14:58 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le dimanche 17 septembre 2023 à 12:56 +0100, Richard Shann a écrit : > > I can't figure out why this: > > > > \version "2.24.0" > > { > >     \set fingeringOrientations = #'( left right up down) > ''-1 > > e ''-2 g''-3 > > > } > > > > o

Re: Fingering orientations

Le dimanche 17 septembre 2023 à 12:56 +0100, Richard Shann a écrit : > I can't figure out why this: > > \version "2.24.0" > { >     \set fingeringOrientations = #'( left right up down) e ''-2 g''-3 > > } > > outputs the 0 and 3 fingerings down and up respectively and the other > two right with n

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:00 PM Knute Snortum wrote: > > Maybe this is what you're looking for? > > \version "2.22.2" > > leftHand = { > \clef bass > e,2 g, | > } > pedal = { > \set Dynamics.pedalSustainStyle = #'bracket > % \override Dynamics.SustainPedal.self-alignment-X = #CENTER > %

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

Maybe this is what you're looking for? \version "2.22.2" leftHand = { \clef bass e,2 g, | } pedal = { \set Dynamics.pedalSustainStyle = #'bracket % \override Dynamics.SustainPedal.self-alignment-X = #CENTER % The line below does what you want, I believe \override Dynamics.PianoPedalBr

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

Interesting! They look more different on yours than on mine. I'm not sure why. -Molly On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:57 PM Mark Mathias wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:37 PM Molly Preston > wrote: > >> Yeah I tried that and it didn't look any different to me. I want the >> sustainOn to be in t

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:37 PM Molly Preston wrote: > Yeah I tried that and it didn't look any different to me. I want the > sustainOn to be in the middle of the note head. > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023, 22:07 Mark Mathias wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:52 PM Molly Preston >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

Yeah I tried that and it didn't look any different to me. I want the sustainOn to be in the middle of the note head. On Tue, Jan 24, 2023, 22:07 Mark Mathias wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:52 PM Molly Preston > wrote: > >> Thank you so much Knute! >> >> I have another question. Is there a w

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:52 PM Molly Preston wrote: > Thank you so much Knute! > > I have another question. Is there a way to get the sustain pedal to be > directly underneath the note instead of to the left? I tried > self-alignment-x = #1, but it didn't change anything. > > > > \version "2.22.

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

Thank you so much Knute! I have another question. Is there a way to get the sustain pedal to be directly underneath the note instead of to the left? I tried self-alignment-x = #1, but it didn't change anything. \version "2.22.2" leftHand = { \clef bass e,2 g, | } pedal = { \override Sust

Re: fingering and pedal marking questions

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:07 PM Molly Preston wrote: > > Hi! I'm doing a notation assignment. > > 1) How do I get the pedal markings to show up bracket style when using the > Dynamics context for it? > > 2) How do I get the fingering 1 in the second voice to move above the Staff? 1) Use score co

Re: fingering of a grace note overlaps with beam

Thank you! On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:51 AM Martín Rincón Botero < martinrinconbot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Soo, > > this seems to be caused by the fact that there's no outside-staff-priority > set for Fingerings (see https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6346). > Setting it apparently t

Re: fingering of a grace note overlaps with beam

Hi Soo, this seems to be caused by the fact that there's no outside-staff-priority set for Fingerings (see https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6346). Setting it apparently to whatever value fixes your problem for now. \relative c'' { \override

Re: fingering of a grace note overlaps with beam

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 6:16 AM Soo Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > In the example below, the fingering on the grace note B does not show well > because it overlaps with the beam. I do want to keep the stems up and the > fingering up because there will be another voice. What is the best way to > avoid t

Re: Fingering collision with tempo when using cross-staff beams

A quick workaround: \version "2.23.5" global = { \time 6/8 \tempo "Allegro" } goUp = { \change Staff = "right" \stemDown } goDown = { \change Staff = "left" \stemUp } right = \relative c'' { \global \once\override Fingering.cross-staff = ##f 8-2-4 \goDown \goUp

Re: Fingering collision with tempo when using cross-staff beams

Le 05/01/2022 à 20:59, Michael Rivers a écrit : The fingering here collides with the tempo. If the cross-staff beams are commented out (all notes on the upper staff), the fingering displays fine. Is there a workaround? Am I doing something wrong? \version "2.23.5" global = {   \time 6/8   \t

Re: Fingering collision

Le 31/05/2021 à 22:38, Valentin Petzel a écrit : Hello Stéphane, If you want manual control you can try to move New_fingering_engraver from Voice to Staff. The Y-position has to be tweaked manually (which would kind of not work if the side-axis-interface is used). It is somewhat of a hack, to g

Re: Fingering collision

Hello Stéphane, If you want manual control you can try to move New_fingering_engraver from Voice to Staff. The Y-position has to be tweaked manually (which would kind of not work if the side-axis-interface is used). It is somewhat of a hack, to get this done propery we’d need to create an engr

Re: Fingering collision

Bonjour Stéphane, The example you want shows three voices while your file has only two... So I'd do something like: \version "2.20.0" \new Staff \relative c' << \new Voice { \voiceOne \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left) 2 } \new Voice { \voiceTwo \set fingeringOrienta

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Hi Harm and thank you for your detailed answer. For some reason, at the first time, I was pretty sure it looked like curved beams... My mistake! Cheers, Pierre Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 19:11, Thomas Morley a écrit : > Am So., 23. Aug. 2020 um 18:39 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider > : > > > > Su

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Sure Harm, here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YND32HckZqk&t=1m24s Cheers, Pierre Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 11:02, Thomas Morley a écrit : > Am So., 23. Aug. 2020 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider > : > > > > Dear Andrew, > > > > Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 08:09, Andrew Bernard > a

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Am So., 23. Aug. 2020 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : > > Dear Andrew, > > Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 08:09, Andrew Bernard a > écrit : > >> I play bass gamba - I've always wanted to do the lovely curved beams >> (and for Bach,. and the lot!). No chance lilypond will ever be able to, >>

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Dear Andrew, Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 08:09, Andrew Bernard a écrit : I play bass gamba - I've always wanted to do the lovely curved beams > (and for Bach,. and the lot!). No chance lilypond will ever be able to, > I don't think! > I saw Harm (T. Morley) making a short presentation (no details) o

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 07:56, Andrew Bernard a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > Bass gamba in France has very detailed markups, such as poussez (p) and > tirez (t), push and pull (up and down bow), and a whole swag more. I'll > dig up some Marin Marais and send to you. > Thank you Andrew.

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Thank you for the examples. Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 07:59, Alasdair McAndrew a écrit : > There are other issues with this music, which can bristle with expressive > marks: bowing and fingering information, various shorthands for different > sorts of ornaments, over and above the placement of the

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Hi Alasdair, I play bass gamba - I've always wanted to do the lovely curved beams (and for Bach,. and the lot!). No chance lilypond will ever be able to, I don't think! Andrew

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Hi Pierre, Bass gamba in France has very detailed markups, such as poussez (p) and tirez (t), push and pull (up and down bow), and a whole swag more. I'll dig up some Marin Marais and send to you. Andrew On 23/08/2020 2:35 pm, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi Alasdair, I've never seen suc

Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?

Hi Alasdair, I've never seen such notation. I'd be curious to see an example. Maybe this could help: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1068 E.g.: \version "2.20.0" #(define-markup-command (circled-pattern layout props radius angle num arg) (number? number? number? markup?) (interpret-marku

Re: Fingering inside staff

On 5/30/20, Thomas Morley wrote: > add-stem-support is not really documented. > Alas, I've not the time and energy to write a patch myself and fight > my way through the new GitLab process. “Fighting your way” sounds pretty accurate these days. If I may give it a try: https://gitlab.com/lilypond

Re: Fingering inside staff

Am Sa., 30. Mai 2020 um 13:18 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > Alas, I've not the time and energy to write a patch myself and fight > > my way through the new GitLab process. > > git push -o merge_request.create -o merge_request.title="My patch" -o > merge_request.remov

Re: Fingering inside staff

Thomas Morley writes: > Alas, I've not the time and energy to write a patch myself and fight > my way through the new GitLab process. git push -o merge_request.create -o merge_request.title="My patch" -o merge_request.remove_source_branch origin HEAD:my-proposed-branch-name The push message gi

Re: Fingering inside staff

Am Sa., 30. Mai 2020 um 10:15 Uhr schrieb Valentin Villenave : > > On 5/30/20, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Fingering.add-stem-support is per default set to 'only-if-beamed' > > Of course!! I vaguely remembered having come across something like > that. Sorry for making a fool of myself. > > > Try: >

Re: Fingering inside staff

On 5/30/20, Valentin Villenave wrote: > Excellent; NOTABUT then. Ouch. NOTABUG. (Though I can’t say I wasn’t childishly tempted to add an additional T :-) V.

Re: Fingering inside staff

On 5/30/20, Thomas Morley wrote: > Fingering.add-stem-support is per default set to 'only-if-beamed' Of course!! I vaguely remembered having come across something like that. Sorry for making a fool of myself. > Try: > \override Fingering.add-stem-support = #'() > and it'll work Excellent; NOT

Re: Fingering inside staff

Am Sa., 30. Mai 2020 um 00:08 Uhr schrieb Valentin Villenave : > > On 5/29/20, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > > Hi Simone, > > A basic solution: > > \relative c' { > > \stemUp > > \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'() > > 4 8 > > } > > Sure there are workarounds, but: shouldn’t we be tr

Re: Fingering inside staff

On 5/29/20, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > Hi Simone, > A basic solution: > \relative c' { > \stemUp > \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'() > 4 8 > } Sure there are workarounds, but: shouldn’t we be treating this as a bug? There’s no obvious reason why unsetting staff-padding should b

Re: Fingering inside staff

Should be simple enough to just tweak the vertical offset. \relative c' { \stemUp \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'() 4 g'8-\tweak Y-offset #0 -0 g' }

Re: Fingering inside staff

Hi Simone, A basic solution: \version "2.20.0" \relative c' { \stemUp \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'() 4 8 } Cheers, Pierre Le ven. 29 mai 2020 à 15:20, Simone Capretti a écrit : > Hello to all, > > I've read in the manual that it's possible to insert fingering inside the > staf

Re: Fingering and slurs

On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, Noeck wrote: I am transcribing piano music and I see a lot of ugly situations with fingering and slurs. +1 following.

Re: Fingering orientation question

> Le 5 déc. 2019 à 18:02, Mark Stephen Mrotek a écrit : > > Jacques, > > You do not need to use chord notation and the \set command. > Fingering down indicated by the _ (underscore), e.g., a,4_3, and the up > fingering by the ^ (carat), e.g., e^1 > The - (dash) is a neutral setting and Lilypond

Re: Fingering orientation question

Are you looking for this? \override Staff.Fingering.direction = #DOWN -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

RE: Fingering orientation question

: Re: Fingering orientation question Thanks Thomas for the explanation and example! >> Would it be reasonable and feasible to apply such fingering orientation at >> the voice level? > > Not sure what you mean… In my piano example, all the fingerings for the left hand appear be

RE: Fingering orientation question

Jacques, You do not need to use chord notation and the \set command. Fingering down indicated by the _ (underscore), e.g., a,4_3, and the up fingering by the ^ (carat), e.g., e^1 The - (dash) is a neutral setting and Lilypond decides according to voice number. Mark -Original Message- F

RE: Fingering orientation question

JM, You can just use ^ to put the fingering above or _ to put it below. If the voice will always be the lower voice (as in your left-hand piano example) this works well. BUT it doesn't allow you to choose the orientation (top or bottom) after inputting the notes. Note that using - (as in your exam

Re: Fingering orientation question

Thanks Thomas for the explanation and example! >> Would it be reasonable and feasible to apply such fingering orientation at >> the voice level? > > Not sure what you mean… In my piano example, all the fingerings for the left hand appear below the notes, so I wondered whether this could be spe

Re: Fingering orientation question

Am Do., 5. Dez. 2019 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Jacques Menu : > > Hello folks, > > In the attached score, I’ve had to create artificial one-note chords such as > for the down fingering orientation to be taken into account: > > \set fingeringOrientations = #'(down) > > 4 a, e | % 2 > > I didn’t fi

Re: fingering

Gianmaria Lari wrote: If I'm not wrong to generate the two variables (myMusic and myFing) from the previous code should not be that difficult. 1 I duplicate the music expression 2 In the variable where I want to put the music I remove the fingering 3 In the variable where I want to put the fin

Re: fingering

Dear Robin you wrote: > [...] You should limit lilypond to one staff by saying > \new Staff << \myMusic \myFing >> > > > That looks better, but it is still not equivalent. > Try changing the s-2 to s_2: > the notehead and the fingering collide. > To avoid that you should also limit lilypond t

Re: fingering

I found some solution that I post here to get some feedback and/or other suggestions. Here they are 4 different ways to add fingering to a musical expression: *1 Standard:* \version "2.21.0" \fixed c' {a-1 c' f'-\finger\markup\circle 3 a'-4} *2 Different context *(thanks Pierre Perol-Schneider

Re: fingering

Gianmaria Lari wrote: But when I finished to enter the fingering, I would definitely prefer having the fingering instruction separated by the music. Something like this (NB: it does not work correctly but I hope the idea is clear): \version "2.21.0" myMusic = {a4 b c' d'} myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3

Re: fingering

Ciao Stephane! On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 11:23, Stephan Schöll wrote: > Despite of my newbie status on the list, let me ask back: > > What's your intention with separating dynamics, the notes and the > fingerings? > > If the separation is only for displaying purposes in a specific staff, I > would s

Re: fingering

On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 11:16, Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gianmaria, > I suppose you'll have to create/modify your own contect, say > 'Fingerings, such as : > > \version "2.21.0" > myMusic = {a4 b c' d'} > myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3 s-4} > << >

Re: fingering

Despite of my newbie status on the list, let me ask back: What's your intention with separating dynamics, the notes and the fingerings? If the separation is only for displaying purposes in a specific staff, I would simply remove the corresponding engravers from the voice \remove "Dynamic_en

Re: fingering

Hi Gianmaria, I suppose you'll have to create/modify your own contect, say 'Fingerings, such as : \version "2.21.0" myMusic = {a4 b c' d'} myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3 s-4} << \new Staff \myMusic \new Dynamics \with { \consists Fingering_engraver } \myFing >> See: http://l

Re: fingering

Valentin Villenave writes: > On 1/21/19, Aaron Hill wrote: >> That seems like such a useful pattern. > > Agreed. > >> Why is it only mentioned once >> and buried away in extending.pdf? Also, there is no use of it in the >> entirety of the LSR. > > Well, grob-transformer is a relatively new func

Re: fingering

On 1/21/19, Aaron Hill wrote: > That seems like such a useful pattern. Agreed. > Why is it only mentioned once > and buried away in extending.pdf? Also, there is no use of it in the > entirety of the LSR. Well, grob-transformer is a relatively new function (it was introduced after 2.18, which

Re: fingering

On 2019-01-21 1:23 pm, David Kastrup wrote: Aaron Hill writes: Using \omit Fingering is supposed to eliminate Fingering grobs until it is \undone. The problem is that \tweak also modifies the stencil, cancelling out the effect of the \omit. I fail to see the problem. You specify a specific

Re: fingering

Aaron Hill writes: > This variation works: > > > \version "2.19.82" > { \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left) > \override Fingering.stencil = #(lambda (grob) > (ly:make-stencil '() '(0 . 0) '(0 . 0))) That's just #point-stencil . >} > > > Here we have a valid, albeit empty,

Re: fingering

On 2019-01-21 6:04 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote: Using your old code to draw a circle around finger number on the left of the note today I found a problem. When I use "\omit Fingering" the compilation report me the error: programming error: Infinity or NaN encountered \omit Fingering Here it is

Re: fingering

Hi Gianmaria, > Using your old code to draw a circle around finger number on the left of the > note today I found a problem. When I use "\omit Fingering" the compilation > report me the error: > > programming error: Infinity or NaN encountered Has nothing to do with my code, you rather detected

Re: fingering

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 at 08:43, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > On 23 February 2018 at 00:53, Thomas Morley > wrote: > >> 2018-02-22 11:03 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : >> > 2018-02-22 10:58 GMT+01:00 Gianmaria Lari : >> >> Dear Harm, >> >> >> >> thank you for your really nice help. Your fix worked well and

Re: fingering color

Perfect! Thank you David and Urs!! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: fingering color

Gianmaria Lari writes: > First time I try to change color of lilypond elements. > > This is what I did to change fingering color: > > \version "2.19.82" > { c' \finger \markup { \with-color #red 1 }} > > Is there a better way? { c' -\tweak color #red -1 } -- David Kastrup

Re: fingering color

Am 15.01.19 um 13:43 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: First time I try to change color of lilypond elements. This is what I did to change fingering color: \version "2.19.82" { c' \finger \markup { \with-color #red 1 }} {   \override Fingering.color = #red   c' -1 } Is there a better way?

Re: Fingering vs stem direction

Am Mi., 5. Dez. 2018 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : > > Thank you Harm, that works fine (no beam/flag at that point). > Cheers, > Pierre Ok, then I put not more work on it. Glad I could help, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypon

Re: Fingering vs stem direction

Thank you Harm, that works fine (no beam/flag at that point). Cheers, Pierre Le mer. 5 déc. 2018 à 11:16, Thomas Morley a écrit : > Am Mi., 5. Dez. 2018 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider > : > > > > Thank you Harm, > > In this particular case, there is no chord. > > Cheers, > > Pierre

Re: Fingering vs stem direction

Am Mi., 5. Dez. 2018 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : > > Thank you Harm, > In this particular case, there is no chord. > Cheers, > Pierre So why use event-chords and a context-property then? Wouldn't below work already? #(define (forced-dir-II grob) (let* ((x-parent (ly:grob-pare

Re: Fingering vs stem direction

Hi Urs, Le mer. 5 déc. 2018 à 11:04, Urs Liska a écrit : >So why do you need chords at all? Since for fingering orientation to apply, you must use a chord construct >And what are you actually trying to achieve, forcing the fingering on the opposite side of the stem or apply the X-offset tweaks?

Re: Fingering vs stem direction

Am 05.12.18 um 10:56 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Thank you Harm, In this particular case, there is no chord. So why do you need chords at all? And what are you actually trying to achieve, forcing the fingering on the opposite side of the stem or apply the X-offset tweaks? Urs Cheer

Re: Fingering vs stem direction

Thank you Harm, In this particular case, there is no chord. Cheers, Pierre Le mer. 5 déc. 2018 à 10:44, Thomas Morley a écrit : > Am Mi., 5. Dez. 2018 um 10:26 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider > : > > > > Hi All, > > > > I'm looking for a function that'll do: > > > > { > > \clef "G_8" > >

Re: Fingering vs stem direction

Am Mi., 5. Dez. 2018 um 10:26 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : > > Hi All, > > I'm looking for a function that'll do: > > { > \clef "G_8" > \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'() > 4 > > } > > As a first step, I've tried to adapt Harm's function found here: > http://lilypond.1069038

Re: fingering footnote

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 02:55, Aaron Hill wrote: > On 2018-09-22 10:17 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > I would like to create a footnote attached to a fingering. Ideally > > something like this > > > > \version "2.19.82" > > {b\finger "2*"} > > > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > ... and then in the

Re: fingering footnote

On 2018-09-22 10:17 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote: I would like to create a footnote attached to a fingering. Ideally something like this \version "2.19.82" {b\finger "2*"} [image: image.png] ... and then in the footnote I would like to give some indication about the fingering. I saw the footno

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Thomas Morley-2 wrote > this weekend I'll have not much time and I'll be completely offline > next week for holidays. No need to hurry, Happy Holidays ;) (oh no, that was politically correct and is restricted Christmas time use only). Thomas Morley-2 wrote > In my initial testing I experienced

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

2018-08-11 15:00 GMT+02:00 Torsten Hämmerle : > Thomas Morley-2 wrote >> I tried to Y-center the Fingering-stencil. >> >> Though, with the example below the result is not all that convincing. >> […] >> Additionally, if fingeringOrientations contains 'left or 'right a >> FingeringColumn is built at

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Thomas Morley-2 wrote > I tried to Y-center the Fingering-stencil. > > Though, with the example below the result is not all that convincing. > […] > Additionally, if fingeringOrientations contains 'left or 'right a > FingeringColumn is built at Staff-level, so the 'snap-radius-property > comes int

Re: fingering position

Thank you David and Noeck, your solutions work. I will also check the documentation about staff-padding and avoid-slur as soon as the lilypond site will work again. Thanks, g. On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 00:22, Noeck wrote: > Dear Gianmaria, > > here are two more options: > > > \fixed c' { > \once

Re: fingering position

Dear Gianmaria, here are two more options: \fixed c' { \once \override StringNumber.staff-padding = ##f a8\3( b d'-5 \once \override StringNumber.extra-offset = #'(0 . -0.2) c'\4 b a) r4 } \fixed c' { a8\3_( b d'-5 c'\4 b a) r4 } Cheers, Joram

Re: fingering position

Gianmaria Lari writes: > This code > > \version "2.19.82" > \fixed c' { a8\3( b d'-5 c'\4 b a) r4} > > generate this > > image.png > > I don't like having some fingering above the slur (3) and some below it (5 & > 4). How > can I change this? \version "2.19.82" \new Staff \with { \override

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Thomas Morley-2 wrote > […] > \mark "Fingerings right" > \set fingeringOrientations = #'(right) > […] Hi Harm, When setting fingeringOrientations to #'(right), the occasional collision of fingering and dots are a result of dots moving vertically away too far from their noteheads. In

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > I created one and tried to include all the analyses yet presented. > ; Thanks, Simon. I think makes sense trying to improve the fingering placement step by step. And everything that can get ...Orientations (fingeringOr

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Hi Harm, Yes, fingerings are quite a large construction zone (and right hand fingerings or string numbers as well). Issue 3692 hasn't been solved yet, and your examples show that there is also a general dot collision problem for right fingerings. When increasing snap-radius, fingerings may overla

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

On 02.08.2018 12:10, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: I think this should get its own tracker issue. I created one and tried to include all the analyses yet presented. Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mail

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

2018-08-02 12:10 GMT+02:00 Torsten Hämmerle : > Simon Albrecht-2 wrote >> I went to the issue tracker so this doesn’t get lost – it seems to be >> related to or a subset of >> ;. > > Hi Simon, > > While the descriptive title "Fingering collisio

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > I went to the issue tracker so this doesn’t get lost – it seems to be > related to or a subset of > ;. Hi Simon, While the descriptive title "Fingering collision with accidentals" of issue 3692 more or less describe

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

On 31.07.2018 18:12, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: David Kastrup wrote A feature of the placement algorithm and a bug of the character design maybe? The sharp glyph design looks OK to me: left: fingering and accidental skyli

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

David Kastrup wrote > A feature of the placement algorithm and a bug of the character design > maybe? The sharp glyph design looks OK to me: left: fingering and accidental skylines taken from the example (stave removed)

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Torsten Hämmerle writes: > Schneidy wrote >> The first fingerings are independently positioned while the second >> integrate the accidental sign to calculate the padding. >> This happend with sharp glyph only. >> I guess it has something to do with upper 'Y-extent from the fingering -- >> not fro

Re: Fingering position in polyphony face to sharp glyph. Bug?

Schneidy wrote > The first fingerings are independently positioned while the second > integrate the accidental sign to calculate the padding. > This happend with sharp glyph only. > I guess it has something to do with upper 'Y-extent from the fingering -- > not from the glyph(?) --, however I did n

Re: fingering notation alternative

On 7 May 2018 at 23:59, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2018-05-07 23:35 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : > > > > > I tried to write alternative fingering putting fingering numbers on a > > column. This is what I did: > > > > { c' \finger \markup \center-column {2 3}} > > > > But the distance between numbers is

Re: fingering notation alternative

2018-05-07 23:35 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : > > I tried to write alternative fingering putting fingering numbers on a > column. This is what I did: > > { c' \finger \markup \center-column {2 3}} > > But the distance between numbers is a bit too large. Does exist a better > way? > > Thank you, g.

Re: fingering notation alternative

On 5 May 2018 at 22:37, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meyn wrote: > >> >> >> Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: >> >>> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. >>> >>> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be

Re: fingering notation alternative

On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > >> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. >> >> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be >> played for example with 2 or 3? >> > > I agree with David

Re: fingering notation alternative

Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be played for example with 2 or 3? I agree with David and Ralph: put them on top of each other or at oppisite sides

  1   2   3   >