Despite of my newbie status on the list, let me ask back:
What's your intention with separating dynamics, the notes and the
fingerings?
If the separation is only for displaying purposes in a specific staff, I
would simply remove the corresponding engravers from the voice
\remove "Dynamic_engraver"
\remove "Fingering_engraver"
Just my 2 cents ;-)
Cheers, Stephan
Am 06.05.2019 um 10:41 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> I normally enter fingering instruction using the "note-digit" convention
> (
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#fingering-instructions)
> like this:
>
> \version "2.21.0"
> {a4-1 b-2 c'-3 d'-4}
>
>
> This way of proceeding it's in my opinion the easiest and less error
> prone because you see clearly the note where the fingering is applied.
>
> But when I finished to enter the fingering, I would definitely prefer
> having the fingering instruction separated by the music. Something like
> this (NB: it does not work correctly but I hope the idea is clear):
>
> \version "2.21.0"
> myMusic = {a4 b c' d'}
> myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3 s-4}
> << \myMusic \myFing >>
>
>
> Now the question: Does exist any Frescobaldi snippet to make this
> operation, that means: it takes the music with fingering and it copy the
> fingering and the note in two different variable (or something similar)?
>
> The same would make sense also for dynamics.
>
> Thank you, g.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
