Valentin Villenave <valen...@villenave.net> writes: > On 1/21/19, Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> wrote: >> That seems like such a useful pattern. > > Agreed. > >> Why is it only mentioned once >> and buried away in extending.pdf? Also, there is no use of it in the >> entirety of the LSR. > > Well, grob-transformer is a relatively new function (it was introduced > after 2.18, which makes it unvailable on the LSR for now). You can, > however, find plenty of LSR snippets where the stencil is rewritten as > a lambda function (just not with grob-transformer)…
That wouldn't help here since the point of grob-transformer is to have the "old" value available (where the definition of "old" can be tricky when there are other local modifications around). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
