On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 01:57:29PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le vendredi 21 août 2009 à 08:54 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > LM 5 is being moved into the AU,
>
> What's the rationale for this? I must have missed in some discussion on
> the lists, but I couldn't find it in Git commit me
Le vendredi 21 août 2009 à 08:54 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit :
> LM 5 is being moved into the AU,
What's the rationale for this? I must have missed in some discussion on
the lists, but I couldn't find it in Git commit message as I might have
expected.
Cheers,
John
signature.asc
Description
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:43:24AM -0400, Ralph Palmer wrote:
> Is the GDP dead?
Yes, but there's always room for more doc work. Also, GDP2 might
start in a month or two.
> If not, is there anything ready for indexing? If not,
> should I start working on reviewing something? I wo
Greetings -
Is the GDP dead? If not, is there anything ready for indexing? If not,
should I start working on reviewing something? I would be willing to make a
start on LM 5 Working, but I don't feel qualified to make substantive
changes. I can look for grammar and organization and make sure
Patrick McCarty wrote Friday, October 17, 2008 6:54 PM
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:15 PM
I thought we wanted to leave all of these examples here. Since they
cover all of the easy-to-tweak p
Till Rettig wrote Friday, October 17, 2008 11:39 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
(in response to)
1) 1.6 Why doesn't the headword show something really specific to staff
notation? ( ossia, cut-out score, tab/rhythm/drum staff?)
I agree it would be better if it did. Do you have any suggestions
for
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:15 PM
>
>> I thought we wanted to leave all of these examples here. Since they
>> cover all of the easy-to-tweak properties of StaffSymbol, I think it
>> would be bett
his kind of music
with a free license?
till
-
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LilyPond-Hilfe auch auf deutsch im http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php
LilyPond-Forum .
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/GDP-NR-1.6-Staff-notation-ready-for-public-review-tp19952444p20030893.html
Sent
Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:15 PM
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
James E. Bailey wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 2:57 PM
3) 1.6.2.1 Everything before \startStaff & \stopStaff seems like stuff
from 5.3 (modifying properties)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James E. Bailey wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 2:57 PM
>> 3) 1.6.2.1 Everything before \startStaff & \stopStaff seems like stuff
>> from 5.3 (modifying properties). And it seems like the whole section is
>> there to in
been reviewed by members of the
GDP team. So I'll do it now.
Could all of you will a few minutes to spare please look through this
section at
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Staff-notation.html#Staff-notation
and post any comments, corrections or criticism to
]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lilypond-User List"
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: GDP NR 1.6 Staff notation ready for public review
Am Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:33:10 +0100
schrieb "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
a
: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lilypond-User List"
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: GDP NR 1.6 Staff notation ready for public review
Hi Trevor,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Please correct me if I am wron
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Sebastian Menge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:33:10 +0100
> schrieb "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> and post any comments, corrections or criticism to this list. Thanks.
>
> Very well done. I only skimmed the text, but understood a
embers of the
> GDP team. So I'll do it now.
>
> Could all of you will a few minutes to spare please look through this
> section at
>
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Staff-notation.html#Staff-notation
>
> and post any comments, corrections
Am Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:33:10 +0100
schrieb "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> and post any comments, corrections or criticism to this list. Thanks.
Very well done. I only skimmed the text, but understood a lot of things
I only imitated before. Certainly an important section.
The only thing
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems NR 1.6 Staff notation has
never been announced as ready for public review, although it seems to be in
good shape (thanks to Till) and has been reviewed by members of the GDP
team. So I'll do it now.
Could all of you will a few minutes to
Hi, all -
Simultaneous has been indexed. I don't think I've heard of anything else
being ready. Is that correct?
Ralph
--
Ralph Palmer
Greenfield, MA
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Hi -
I think it would be helpful to have a better description of the indexes,
what's being indexed, and what the indexes do/are.
Specifically:
1. Are all the entries in the command index duplicated in the regular
index?
2. In the regular index, what's the significance of the colon? What
2008/8/11 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks, I applied all your suggestions.
Thank you, Graham, I've been very disconnected and missed this.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-
On 8/13/08 5:35 PM, "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If it's about Ralph personally, here's what I suggest:
> - there aren't any more doc sections ready for indexing, so put
> that on hold for now.
> - get in contact (some more) with Valentin, and start doing LSR
> stuff.
>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:47:24 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm certain that for simple things like index entries,
> > somebody (probably Neil, but maybe Trevor or Patrick) will
> > volun
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm certain that for simple things like index entries,
> somebody (probably Neil, but maybe Trevor or Patrick) will
> volunteer to handle that side of things for you.
I would be willing to make patches for Ralph, bu
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:35:49 + (UTC)
Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ralph Palmer gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Greetings -Is Graham still in charge of the GDP? When does (did?)
> > the baton change hands, and to
> > whom?
>
> Graham
Ralph Palmer gmail.com> writes:
>
> Greetings -Is Graham still in charge of the GDP? When does (did?) the
> baton change hands, and to
> whom?
Graham is still in charge of the GDP. The GDP officially ends this week, when
Graham heads off to a conference (and hopefully some v
Greetings -
Is Graham still in charge of the GDP? When does (did?) the baton change
hands, and to whom?
Peace,
Ralph
--
Ralph Palmer
Greenfield, MA
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
han Kulp, so be sure he gets lots of credit for the work.
>
> I only have suggestions for GDP policy:
>
> ** the subsubsection-->unnumberedsubsubsec conversion
> 2.4.1.1: Duplicate the link to "Collision resolution" in @seealso
> 2.4.1.7: The entries in @predefined
ful addition to the docs.
I only have suggestions for GDP policy:
** the subsubsection-->unnumberedsubsubsec conversion
2.4.1.1: Duplicate the link to "Collision resolution" in @seealso
2.4.1.7: The entries in @predefined should be inside @code{...}
2.4.3.1: Use Installed Files: for t
t; After reading this I felt the only way to understand
> it was to go away and experiment :(
>
> Trevor
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Carl D. Sorensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "lily-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>
D]>;
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 12:49 AM
Subject: GDP -- Revised second draft of Fretted strings
Dear Lilypond Users and Developers,
We're pleased to announce a revised second draft of NR 2.4 Fretted strings.
This draft includes the new predefined-fretboards functionality that enables
trans
Ok. That was my instinct, too, so I'll do that and get on with the rest
of the .itely file. Thanks Graham,
Jon
Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:52:09 + (UTC)
Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Kulp gmail.com> writes:
So, the question is whether it's worth
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:52:09 + (UTC)
Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Kulp gmail.com> writes:
>
> > So, the question is whether it's worth introducing
> > add-grace-property and/or remove-grace-property at that point in
> > NR, since it already shows how to alter stem dire
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:53:06 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robin Bannister wrote Monday, August 11, 2008 1:32 PM
> >
> > where the current HTML version says just
> >> See also
> >> Internals Reference: Fingering.
> >> Follow the link to Fingering.
>
> There are several se
Thanks, fixed.
Cheers,
- GRaham
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:10:22 +0100
Daniel Hulme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.9.1.4, first paragraph: "Where matching existing typeset music is
> not an issue, you may still want to adjust the beaming behaviour
> and/or using compound time signatures."
>
> "usin
Thanks, I applied all your suggestions.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:40:16 +0100
Daniel Hulme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking over NR 1.5.2, I see what appears to be a typo in the fifth
> paragraph of the 'Single-staff polyphony' page.
>
> "The method exposed creates two new vo
Jonathan Kulp wrote Monday, August 11, 2008 11:19 PM
1. The "add-grace-property" example currently appearing in NR does not
work anymore. --#(add-grace-property 'Voice 'Stem 'direction '()) It
needs to be removed or changed
Correct. Have you investigated whether other properties can
be cha
Jonathan Kulp gmail.com> writes:
>
> So, the question is whether it's worth introducing add-grace-property
> and/or remove-grace-property at that point in NR, since it already shows
> how to alter stem direction using \stemDown in a different example right
> before it. Is it sufficiently abn
Ok thanks everyone for responding to this. What I gather is the following:
1. The "add-grace-property" example currently appearing in NR does not
work anymore. --#(add-grace-property 'Voice 'Stem 'direction '()) It
needs to be removed or changed
2. The way to accomplish the same thing is to
2008/8/11 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> 2008/8/11 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> "The layout of grace expressions can be changed throughout the
>> music using the function @code{add-grace-property}. The following
>> example undefines the @code{Stem} direction for th
Hi Jonathan,
2008/8/11 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "The layout of grace expressions can be changed throughout the
> music using the function @code{add-grace-property}. The following
> example undefines the @code{Stem} direction for this grace, so
> that stems do not always point up."
>
Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
>
> Jonathan Kulp gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Since we're trying to get rid of @example passages and use real musical
> > examples instead, I tried to make it work with music. Here's the code I
> > used and the non-fatal error message that followed.
>
> Jonathan
Jonathan Kulp gmail.com> writes:
> Since we're trying to get rid of @example passages and use real musical
> examples instead, I tried to make it work with music. Here's the code I
> used and the non-fatal error message that followed.
Jonathan,
Your code was almost right, but you made two S
2008/8/11 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not at all, but it is probably more productive for you to
> concentrate on the sections of the manuals in development
> which have been completed
By the way, Robin, I hope you know that the very latest PDF version is
always available on
http://kainh
I'm working on the Rhythms section of Notation Reference for GDP, and
I'm having trouble making "add-grace-property" work as described in this
passage from Notation Reference 1.2.6.1:
"The layout of grace expressions can be changed throughout the
music using the
Robin Bannister wrote Monday, August 11, 2008 1:32 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote
You don't say where these are, but I suspect they are
still in sections not yet completed within GDP, ie
sections 3 onward.
NR sections 5.2.1 to 5.7.1
Thanks. At the moment chapter 5 of the Notation Refe
Trevor Daniels wrote
You don't say where these are, but I suspect they are
still in sections not yet completed within GDP, ie
sections 3 onward.
NR sections 5.2.1 to 5.7.1
but I can't see a mention of the PDF version.
Well, er - I was using the PDF version (easier for me to s
Trevor Daniels wrote:
A PDF version of the IR was mooted at one point, but I've
lost track of where this stands. Anyone else know?
Probably just because it would be too long and contain lots of repeated
information (for example
the property descriptions are repeated for every grob where they
Robin Bannister wrote Monday, August 11, 2008 9:06 AM
There are a few places in the NR (version 2008-08-09)
still mentioning
- program reference
- programmer's reference
i.e. terms obsoleted by GDP.
You don't say where these are, but I suspect they are
still in sections not yet
There are a few places in the NR (version 2008-08-09)
still mentioning
- program reference
- programmer's reference
i.e. terms obsoleted by GDP.
And in NR 5.2.1 it says
This section will be much more difficult to understand
if you are using the PDF manual.
Did / does / will this
2.9.1.4, first paragraph: "Where matching existing typeset music is not
an issue, you may still want to adjust the beaming behaviour and/or
using compound time signatures."
"using" -> "use"
--
"Of all things, good sense is the most fairly distributed: everyone
thinks he is so well suppli
Looking over NR 1.5.2, I see what appears to be a typo in the fifth
paragraph of the 'Single-staff polyphony' page.
"The method exposed creates two new voices when the <<{...} \\ {...}>>
construction is found in the code; to temporally add only one additional
voice to an existing one, it is necess
On 8/9/08 10:24 PM, "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 17:49 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> Dear Lilypond Users and Developers,
>>
>> We're pleased to announce a revised second draft of NR 2.4 Fretted strings.
>>
Thanks for your feedback, Joe.
>
> The documentat
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 17:49 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> Dear Lilypond Users and Developers,
>
> We're pleased to announce a revised second draft of NR 2.4 Fretted strings.
>
> This draft includes the new predefined-fretboards functionality that enables
> transposable guitar fret diagrams.
>
wo to see if
the documentation is clear (especially 2.4.1.5 through 2.4.1.7).
As always, the GDP documentation can be found at
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/index.html
Thanks in advance for your reviews. Your careful reviews will help the
quality of the documentation
2008/8/4 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Valentin, in the snippet "Stem and beam behavior in tablature" (#494)
> can you replace
> \override Beam #'damping = #10
> with
> \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
It's updated now (I guess Neil was faster than me) :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - The markup command for \roundf is unnecessarily complicated and the result
> looks bad. The \center-align markup command is intended to produce a column
> of (internally) center aligned markups. If you only have a singl
Karl Hammar wrote:
That is strange, why do you need to do the \new DrumVoice-lines in
drummode? Example of 2.5.1.3:
\new DrumStaff <<
\new DrumVoice = "1" { s1 *2 }
\new DrumVoice = "2" { s1 *2 }
\drummode {
bd4 sn4 bd4 sn4
Hi,
Unfortunately, I haven't had the time to be very active in the review of
the GDP drafts, but I happened
to look into "New dynamic marks" of 1.3.1 and have some comments:
- The markup command for \roundf is unnecessarily complicated and the
result looks bad. The \cent
Karl Hammar wrote:
Ex1: << { \A } \\ { \B } >>
creates TWO new voices, which get you into problems when doing \lyricsto,
where
Ex2: << { \voiceOne \a } \new Voice { \voiceTwo \b } >> \oneVoice
only creates ONE new voice, \a "belongs" to the same voice as the surronding
music.
Ex1 is a
Good call, Andrew. This makes the beams "really" horizontal. Thanks!
Jonathan
Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
My only suggestion is in one of the snippets, but I can't edit it (I
guess only contributor or an LSR admin can modify).
Valentin, in the snippet "Stem and beam behavior in tablature" (#494)
That is marvellous. I will definitely include it.
Andrew
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> 2008/8/4 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Thanks! The marks I have seen in print are about 70% of the current
>> \flageolet diameter, but I don
Hi Andrew,
2008/8/4 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks! The marks I have seen in print are about 70% of the current
> \flageolet diameter, but I don't want to trouble anybody with making
> new markups and then tweaking them to centre them over the note heads.
> I will suggest the origin
My only suggestion is in one of the snippets, but I can't edit it (I
guess only contributor or an LSR admin can modify).
Valentin, in the snippet "Stem and beam behavior in tablature" (#494)
can you replace
\override Beam #'damping = #10
with
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
(Rune gets cred
ord notation of the GDP has now been
> released for public comment. The HTML version of the document is available
> at
>
> <http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Chord-notation.h
> tml#Chord-notation>.
>
> Please take a few minutes to carefully review
Thanks! The marks I have seen in print are about 70% of the current
\flageolet diameter, but I don't want to trouble anybody with making
new markups and then tweaking them to centre them over the note heads.
I will suggest the original, unaltered articulation.
Andrew
2008/8/4 Mats Bengtsson <[EMA
The \flageolet articulation is intended for this purpose. At least in
string music, the resulting circle has the size and layout that I
recognize from string music. I haven't seen any woodwind parts with
harmonics but would be surprised if the circle really was that small
that your example gives. I
I'm trying to show how one could specify a harmonic for a woodwind
instrument (NR 2.6.1.1).
This looks correct when printed, but it's a bit ugly. Any suggestions?
Note that usually the lower (fingered) pitch is not written, but the
small circle is always needed.
{
2^\markup \fontsize #-8 " ○"
27;re only looking for omissions in Arabic notation.
GDP output:
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:13:55 +0100
"Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/29 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > In the back of my mind, I've been planning on standardizing with
> > "musicexpr" throughout the manual. I don't know how far this got.
> >
> > Hmm... Neil, do you f
2008/7/29 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the back of my mind, I've been planning on standardizing with
> "musicexpr" throughout the manual. I don't know how far this got.
>
> Hmm... Neil, do you feel like grepping for "musixexpr" and related
> strings to see if there's any agreement ab
No worries, since it was required, I've just kept on with it, if it's
been changed, then all the better.
Am 30.07.2008 um 21:34 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
James E. Bailey wrote Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:11 PM
It looks fine to me. It might be useful to mention (if it hasn't
changed) that fo
James E. Bailey wrote Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:11 PM
It looks fine to me. It might be useful to mention (if it hasn't
changed) that for crescendo and diminuendo to playback in MIDI they
must be terminated with \!
This used to be true, but it no longer seems to be
requirement in 2.11. I
It looks fine to me. It might be useful to mention (if it hasn't
changed) that for crescendo and diminuendo to playback in MIDI they
must be terminated with \!
Am 30.07.2008 um 20:22 schrieb Patrick McCarty:
I would like to announce the second draft of NR 1.3 Expressive marks.
Please proofre
I would like to announce the second draft of NR 1.3 Expressive marks.
Please proofread this section, and let me know if you find any
omissions or errors. Suggestions for additional snippets to include
(or replace) are greatly appreciated as well.
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Thanks,
Patrick
_
> -Original Message-
> From: Francisco Vila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:14 AM
> To: Palmer, Ralph
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GDP Repeats, Scheme code & extra braces
>
>
> > "where @var{music
2008/7/30 Palmer, Ralph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think (speaking as a tyro regarding Scheme) the spaces make it easier
> for me to decipher on a first pass on a fairly simple piece of Scheme
> coding, and I would be surprised if they confused regular Scheme users.
> Therefore, my preference in the
Greetings -
> --
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:10 -0700
> From: Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: GDP: first public draft, NR 1.4 Repeats
> To: "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: li
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:45:29 +1000
"Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > What else would you propose? (or are you looking at something
> > else?)
>
> I was referring to the fact that the "\partial 4*3" in t
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:38 +1000
> Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Normal repeats:
> > I see you have an example with a partial alternative. Maybe you
> > should call attention to the \partial in the tex
he last time to (easily) get fixes
> included, so please read it and ask about anything that's unclear,
> incorrect, or missing.
>
> As always, you can find it from following the GDP output links
> here:
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:38 +1000
Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Normal repeats:
> I see you have an example with a partial alternative. Maybe you
> should call attention to the \partial in the text, since this is
> something that seems to come up on the user list regularly.
The text
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:00:06 +0200
"Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - I see a double backslash in the PDF (not in HTML) inside the warning
> at the beginning of Manual Repeats, texinfo code is @code{\\repeat},
> what can be done, if any?
Dunno. That
I'm happy to announce the second public draft of NR 2.2 Keyboard
instruments. This is the last time to (easily) get fixes
included, so please read it and ask about anything that's unclear,
incorrect, or missing.
As always, you can find it from following the GDP output links
2008/7/28 Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have misunderstood the first and second inversions for years -- I have
> very little formal music training.
Actually I should have seen it much before, the Spanish (blindly)
translated version contains the same error.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz
On 7/28/08 11:32 AM, "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Dear LilyPond Users,
>>
>> Notation Reference Section 2.7 Chord notation of the GDP has now been
>> released for public commen
orensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear LilyPond Users,
Notation Reference Section 2.7 Chord notation of the GDP has now been
released for public comment. The HTML version of the document is available
at
<http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Chord-notation.h
tml#Chord-notat
This typo is not in the Fretted String section, but rather in 1.5.2
Multiple Voices.
Jon
Stan Sanderson wrote:
Collision resolution section- "Known issues and warnings" there is an
(obvious) misspelling.
"It is not clear in which circumpstances you can..."
Excellent so far!
Stan
__
2008/7/28 Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear LilyPond Users,
>
> Notation Reference Section 2.7 Chord notation of the GDP has now been
> released for public comment. The HTML version of the document is available
> at
>
> <http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Doc
Francisco Vila gmail.com> writes:
>
> There is a TODO at the end of 2.4.1.6...
>
Francisco,
Thanks for the review.
That TODO is in the snippets, so we felt it was OK to go to public review.
I hope to be able to get that done by tomorrow.
Carl
__
You should be able to copy and paste it into your browser in two pieces.
Just don't hit enter or click the go button before both pieces are in.
You can also navigate to it by starting at the main GDP link:
<http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/index.html>
Then choosi
Collision resolution section- "Known issues and warnings" there is an
(obvious) misspelling.
"It is not clear in which circumpstances you can..."
Excellent so far!
Stan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/ma
Dear LilyPond Users,
Notation Reference Section 2.7 Chord notation of the GDP has now been
released for public comment. The HTML version of the document is available
at
<http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Chord-notation.h
tml#Chord-notation>.
Please take a few m
03435-2502
Phone: 603-358-2230
Cell: 603-209-2903
Fax: 603-358-2456
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:38 +1000
From: Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GDP: first public draft, NR 1.4 Repeats
To: Graham
2008/7/25 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm happy to announce the first public draft of NR 2.4 Fretted
> string instruments. Please read it carefully, and let us know
> about anything that's unclear or missing.
>
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Looks good!
There is a TODO at the end of
2008/7/28 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm happy to announce the first public draft of NR 1.4 Repeats!
> Ralph Palmer has done a lot of work preparing this section; please
> read it carefully and let us know about any mistakes or omissions.
Looks very good.
- I see a double backslash in
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 22:22 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the first public draft of NR 1.4 Repeats!
> Ralph Palmer has done a lot of work preparing this section; please
> read it carefully and let us know about any mistakes or omissions.
This looks really good! I don't know
I'm happy to announce the first public draft of NR 1.4 Repeats!
Ralph Palmer has done a lot of work preparing this section; please
read it carefully and let us know about any mistakes or omissions.
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Cheers,
- Graham
___
li
I'm happy to announce the first public draft of NR 2.4 Fretted
string instruments. Please read it carefully, and let us know
about anything that's unclear or missing.
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
briefly the explicit creation
of multiple voices to the techniques listed in Single-staff
polyphony.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: GDP: NR 1.5 Simultaneous, second draft
'll be very grateful.
Please understand that I am no way an expert in all kinds of
specialist notation, just I have learnt more about LP syntax these
months working on GDP than in two years of doc/web/binary
translations.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
__
1 - 100 of 820 matches
Mail list logo
