On 7/8/09 6:27 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> Now for *my* rant.
>
> As I've said before, I stopped using lilypond 4-5 years ago. Last
> Fall, I briefly got back into improving the engraving of my old
> compositions, but that stopped when I went to Singapore.
>
> So why am I still around
Mike, great work!
I have some comments below
On 7/7/09 2:46 PM, "Mike Solomon" wrote:
> Hey lilypond-users,
> Before I put this on the LSR, please play around with this.
> Specifically, please
>
> 1) Make it less sprawling.
Decrease your tab settings. Follow the indentation suggestions g
On 7/7/09 6:44 AM, "Werner" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> For accidentals there is the possibility to obtain them also if not needed by
> adding an exclamation mark !
>
> How to get a chordsymbol if \set chordChanges = ##t ?
>
> Is there a hint?
>
> (Would be nice with the exclamation mark too.)
>
On 7/7/09 5:38 AM, "Werner" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a possibility to print e.g.
>
> F
> _
> C
>
> instead of
>
> F/C
>
> ???
As far as I know, this is not easily done right now.
The chord naming code is currently under revision; I think that it will be
more easily done in the futu
On 7/2/09 1:41 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:50:14PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>> Graham Percival wrote:
> "where is the gui" is unfortunately still common, but the
> new website and the 10.5 GUI work should fix that.
Actually, I beg to differ. Since th
On 6/25/09 2:37 PM, "Jay Hamilton" wrote:
> A: I have tried over and over to follow the docs. AND I have copy and pasted
> both Mats suggestions and now Simon's .
> Mats has never worked. Yes the version info is in the file. No it did not
> work.
> Simon's suggestion, I renamed the file wit
On 6/25/09 8:37 AM, "Hajo Dezelski" wrote:
>> Possibly we should also think of
>> - a better slogan? it seems to me that "Sibelius 6 - Perfect scores"
>> is more attractive than "music notation for everyone."
>> possibly something vaguely like:
> ...
>> Jan.
>
>
> Lilypond - Keep
On 6/23/09 5:19 PM, "Tim McNamara" wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>> On 6/23/09 9:16 AM, "Grammostola Rosea"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Tim McNamara wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 15,
On 6/23/09 9:16 AM, "Grammostola Rosea" wrote:
> Tim McNamara wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>>
>>> Wol et al:
>>>
>> Would it be reasonable to separate the functions of putting notes on
>> the staff and chord names above the staff, and let the user spell
On 6/21/09 4:25 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>> By default, beatLength is the numerator of the time signature.
>
> Don't you mean denominator? I would call the numerator beatCount
> or something. Haven't fol
On 6/21/09 3:27 PM, "Hans Aberg" wrote:
> Yes, beatLength will do a (2+2)+(2+1) beaming. Though this is one
> possible beaming for what I am writing now, my problem is that I have
> bunch of different meters. For example, I may want (2+2)+3,
> (2+2)+3+(2+2) and so on.
>
> I have looked at the
I've forwarded Ian's message from the Frogs mailing list, because I don't
know how to answer his question. I'm sure somebody on -devel will.
Thanks,
Carl
-- Forwarded Message
From: Ian Hulin
Reply-To:
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:25:42 -0600
To: Reinhold Kainhofer ,
Conversation: [frogs] R
On 6/21/09 9:49 AM, "Hans Aberg" wrote:
> On 21 Jun 2009, at 16:47, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
>> SubdivideBeams will break beams at intervals
>> defined by beatLength, which by default is set
>> to 1 over the denominator of the time signature.
>
> Yes, but this is what goes wrong, as my time s
On 6/18/09 8:45 AM, "Laura Conrad" wrote:
>>>>>> "Carl" == Carl D Sorensen writes:
>
> Carl> Does this seem at all promising?
>>>
>>> Yes, but there's still the problem of extra space at the barline. I
>>>
On 6/15/09 2:37 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Joe Neeman wrote:
>> I've started working on a new system for doing vertical layout in one
>> pass (ie. positioning and stretching the systems simultaneously). This
>> should give better default behaviour than the current code and it should
>> also
On 6/14/09 3:38 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
> I'm running into several problems with figured bass while writing another
> large
> orchestral piece. Attached is a sample file highlighting these issues:
>
> 1) How can I add a fi
On 6/8/09 6:15 PM, "Laura Conrad" wrote:
>>>>>> "Carl" == Carl D Sorensen writes:
>
> Carl> Here's my attempt to get the spacing you're looking for. I've
> Carl> done it manually, but if you like it, I think that I
On 6/12/09 9:10 AM, "Tim McNamara" wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2009, at 1:28 AM, Tao Cumplido wrote:
>
>>> I think it's great that you did this. Have you put this on LSR?
>>
>> Thanks. I haven't put this on LSR yet because the function hasn't
>> been much tested yet. Maybe I should have done
On 6/12/09 12:28 AM, "Tao Cumplido" wrote:
>> I think it's great that you did this. Have you put this on LSR?
>
> Thanks. I haven't put this on LSR yet because the function hasn't been much
> tested yet. Maybe I should have done anyway.
> When the function is updated I will upload it there.
On 6/11/09 4:36 PM, "Father Gordon Gilbert" wrote:
> Hi Bertalan,
>
> Looking in jEdit plugin options, the line which shows were the program and
> convert-ly are shows /usr/bin . And Lily fires up just fine, so you'd think
> convert-ly should work as well. I did 'which convert-ly' and it sh
On 6/10/09 8:16 PM, "hendr...@umn.edu" wrote:
> This issue may be too elementary for this mailing list or may have already
> been addressed, however I cannot find answers in digging through the
> archives and am not sure where to ask more basic questions. If I need to be
> re-directed to anoth
On 6/10/09 2:03 AM, "Tao Cumplido" wrote:
>> But as I said before, if anybody wants to create a chordname input mode
>> that
>> takes a root, and arbitrary name string, and an optional added bass,
>> they're
>> welcome to do so.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-02/msg0
On 6/9/09 10:39 AM, "Federico Bruni" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as far as I can see there is not an italian documentation for lilypond.
>
> I'd like to help with that, could you please tell me how can I contribute?
> If other italians want to join, either for just proofreading or
> translating als
On 6/9/09 11:16 AM, "lasconic" wrote:
>
>
> maybe bass ?
> for removing third and fifth and keeping the root only?
Does this mean that you'd like to have a one-note "chord"? I've never seen
this before in notation (but that doesn't mean too much).
If you do want a one-note chord, I'd pref
In our discussion about chord names, Jean-Alexis pointed out that we are
probably missing some modifiers in our chord mode input. He pointed out one
example:
alt: 7.3-.5-.9-.11-.13-
What are some other modifiers that should be added, in your opinion?
Remember that m7b5 doesn't qualify as a modif
On 6/9/09 9:16 AM, "Jean-Alexis Montignies" wrote:
>
> You can find an example of a chord notated as 'phrygian' (well it's more a
> modal indication, but that's what the composer Gary Peacock intended) in the
> lead sheet for Vignette.
> More arguments for using names: Alt is much more easy
On 6/2/09 3:55 AM, "Jean-Alexis Montignies" wrote:
> Hi there, as a jazz player I would like to share my input.
Thanks for sharing, Jean-Alexis.
>
> What I need in scores is really chord names.
> The chord name denotes the intent of the composer and is much subject
> to interpretation.
>
>
On 6/1/09 1:45 PM, "lasconic" wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> Just in case it can be helpful, someone (Karl) post a pdf he wrote on
> MuseScore (http://www.musescore.org) mailing list about chord name display.
> Musescore is a free GPL WYSIWYG scorewriter (with lilypond export
> capabilities)
> Maybe it
On 6/1/09 5:29 PM, "Peter Chubb" wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI output
> from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme code used, at
> http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
Peter,
I haven't had a chance to loo
On 6/1/09 8:56 PM, "Tim McNamara" wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>> A chordnamemode *input* mode has been proposed a couple of times.
>> This mode
>> would take only a root (and optionally, a slash or alternate bas
On 6/1/09 1:38 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Mark Austin wrote:
>>> Thanks James. Works a treat now. However, this means the error is in
>>> the template in the Learning Manual, since I copied it straight over.
>>>
>>> The first few lines of the first \score bl
On 6/1/09 12:50 PM, "Grammostola Rosea" wrote:
> Tim McNamara wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:13 AM, Tim Rowe wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/6/1 Carl D. Sorensen :
>>>
>>>> You are welcome to pursue this, if you are interested in it. I
On 5/31/09 7:34 AM, "Johannes Schöpfer" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> As I already said some time ago when I made my own chordnames functions, I
>> still believe chordnames should be seperated from chords, or at least chords
>> shouldn't produce chordnames since it'll never be clear. And the other way
>>
On 5/30/09 10:55 PM, "Brett Duncan" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>> I assume that there would still have to be some means of creating
>>> exceptions. If someone wants chords named mainly in the Real Book style,
>>> but with minors notated sl
On 5/30/09 7:16 PM, "Carl D. Sorensen" wrote:
> Right now we have a naming problem, separate from the display problem. If
> we can get the code to recognize that we have a Ebmaj7b5, then we can figure
> out how to display it in a way that the users will like. Right no
On 5/30/09 5:15 PM, "Brett Duncan" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>>>> My currently-planned starting point for chord naming is
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.dolmetsch.com/musictheory17.htm#namechords
>>>>>
>>>>
On 5/30/09 9:53 AM, "Grammostola Rosea" wrote:
> Tim McNamara wrote:
>>
>> On May 30, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/30/09 3:21 AM, "Brett Duncan" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
On 5/30/09 3:21 AM, "Brett Duncan" wrote:
> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>> Do we have an Jazz/pop chord expert on the list (I'm sure he/she exist)?
>> And who wants to help with this?
>
> I don't consider myself an "expert", but after 20 years of playing with
> various pop, rock and jazz groups,
On 5/29/09 9:20 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen schrieb:
>>
>> On 5/29/09 2:05 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Carl D. Sorensen schrieb:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>> There i
On 5/29/09 1:56 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> David Stocker schrieb:
>> If I may chime in...
>>
>> This may just be a matter of editorial taste, but would it be possible
>> to make it so the 'X' on in the Tab staff is not the musical glyph
>> from Feta, but rather the character 'capital X' from th
On 5/29/09 6:10 AM, "Grammostola Rosea" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the last months there where some questions about Jazz/pop chords.
> About the notation of the default chords but also about chords with an E
> in the bass, A/E, sus4 etc.
> Some people even posted ways to do it right.
> If I remember
On 5/29/09 2:05 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen schrieb:
>> [...]
>>
>> Here's one way to do it:
>>
>> deadNote =
>> #(define-music-function (parser location note) (ly:music?)
>> (set! (ly:music-property no
On 5/28/09 6:28 PM, "David Stocker" wrote:
> If I may chime in...
>
> This may just be a matter of editorial taste, but would it be possible
> to make it so the 'X' on in the Tab staff is not the musical glyph from
> Feta, but rather the character 'capital X' from the same font set being
> us
On 5/28/09 7:22 AM, "Julian" wrote:
>> But still not within the tablature staff
>> At the moment, I don't know how to manage this.
>
> I found it,
>
> <
>% Dead Note
>\tweak #'stencil #ly:note-head::print
>\tweak #'glyph-name #"2cross"
>\tweak #'style #'special
>f'\1
>
On 5/28/09 1:21 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen schrieb:
>> [...]
>>
>> I think it's better to have the duplication and the ability to switch
>> between \tabNumbersOnly and \tabFullNotation, than to avoid the duplication,
>> and
On 5/27/09 2:50 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/5/23 Marc Hohl :
>> Neil Puttock schrieb:
>
>>> Since none of this works properly (I suspect it will require more than
>>> Scheme hacking to get everything working), I don't think it's suitable
>>> for inclusion.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hm, I guess yo
On 5/26/09 4:03 PM, "Trevor Bača" wrote:
> %%% BEGIN #3 PROPORTIONAL SPACING WITHOUT STRICT NOTE SPACING AND WITH EOL
> ADJUSTMENT %%%
>
> adjustEOLMeterBarlineExtraOffset = #(define-music-function (parser location)
> ()
> #{
> #(define (foo grob)
> (if (<= (ly:item-break-
On 5/26/09 7:33 AM, "David Bobroff" wrote:
> Brandon Olivares wrote:
>> Hi,
>>> One of the tracks starts with this:
>>
>> s16*259 16 16 16 s16 16 16
>>
>
> The "*" is a multiplication sign. "s16*259" means "skip (i.e. invisible
> rest) a 16th note 259 times.
I'd actually say it a bit diff
On 5/25/09 4:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
>> wrote:
It looks like a whole note but has the duration of a quarter note, when
LilyPond determines the spacing.
On 5/25/09 10:57 AM, "Henning Plumeyer" wrote:
> Am 25.05.2009, 02:13 Uhr, schrieb Carl D. Sorensen :
>
> There are some issues though - not with Laura's example where no bar lines
> are needed. But when you want bar lines the bars are too "full".
>
On 5/25/09 12:13 PM, "Julian" wrote:
>
> Hello Marc,
>
> Well at first, english is no my native lang, so sorry for don't speak it well.
>
> I'm the admin of tuxguitar (a tablature editor) project and now i'm trying to
> implement some of these features to the lilypond exporter plugin.
>
>
On 5/24/09 8:56 AM, "Laura Conrad" wrote:
>
> I think so. There's a lot of stuff where modern transcribers typically
> halve or even quarter the note values, and I'd prefer not to but it's
> problematic with the normal lilypond spacing. (One reason it probably
> became common is that the sa
On 5/23/09 1:09 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Neil Puttock schrieb:
>> 2009/5/22 Marc Hohl :
>>> % for ties in tablature, fret numbers that are tied to should be invisible
>>> % or -after a line break - put in parentheses. Since this is not (easily?)
>>> % possible in lilypond, we offer three comma
On 5/22/09 4:25 PM, "Nick Payne" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Patrick McCarty [mailto:pnor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 8:15 AM
>> To: Nick Payne
>> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Should sample code in NR build correctly?
>>
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009
On 5/22/09 7:27 AM, "Paul Hodges" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have looked around, but I can't find anything about this in the pdf
> documentation or snippets (v2.12.2):
>
> At the start of my piece, I have \partial for an upbeat. However, I
> wish to have a full bar (a semibreve in 2/2) at the e
On 5/21/09 2:07 PM, "Stjepan Brbot" wrote:
>
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Stjepan,
>>
>> First, you should know that this has been fixed in the git sources and
>> will
>> be available in the next development release.
>
On 5/21/09 2:54 PM, "Stjepan Brbot" wrote:
>
>
> But this should be the whole snippet code form snippets guide, look at:
>
Yes, but in your file there are apparently 16 lines that come before the
lines you showed in your email.
The line that caused the error is line 2 in your email, and l
On 5/21/09 12:41 AM, "Stjepan Brbot" wrote:
>
>
>
> Tim McNamara wrote:
>>
>> You need to define exceptions to the way that LilyPond writes
>> chords. One way is to use one of the alternative chord rendering
>> methods that you can find in the snippet repository. You can put
>> this into
On 5/21/09 1:08 AM, "Stjepan Brbot" wrote:
>
>
>
> M Watts wrote:
>>
>> There are at least 2 versions in UTF-8; a normal one U+00AC, and a
>> full-width one U+FFE2.
>>
>> To use these within lilypond, do \markup { \char ##x00AC } or \markup {
>> \char ##xFFE2 }.
>>
>> Or, if your file is
On 5/20/09 10:41 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:19:47AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>
> Nonsense. You can push down a string without a fingerboard... ok,
> granted this *really* makes the "ideal string" calculations
>
On 5/20/09 9:20 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:04:30AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>> I've played several orchestral pieces where the violin parts include
>> glissandi ranging over several strings.
>> Mahler Symphony no. 4 comes to my mind, for example. I'm stil
OK, done.
Everything looked great -- you even took out some pre-existing line-ending
whitespace.
Thanks,
Carl
On 5/19/09 2:02 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> Here's a patch incorporating your suggestions, Carl. Thanks for the help.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>
> Carl, when you ge
On 5/18/09 4:09 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/5/18 Mark Polesky :
>> Helge Kruse wrote:
>>> I want to add
>> markups... circled T and the
>>> half-moon... How do I add such special markups?
>>
>> See the 2 attached files.
>
> Nice curve. :)
>
> Here's a slightly simplified version:
>
>
On 5/18/09 6:04 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Carl,
>
> I'm working on your suggestions and have come across a problem.
>
>> \relative c' { \chordmode { c \relative c'' { c }}
>>
>
> This last example won't compile. (It was missing the last curly brace
> but I added it.) Here's the termina
On 5/15/09 4:13 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The notation reference states in section 1.6.3 that \quoteDuring is typically
> used for two instruments that play the same notes during a passage of music.
> Unfortunately, quoteDuring quote
On 5/15/09 3:06 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
wrote:
> In message <200905151909580...@1654122929>, David Pounder
> writes
>>
>> I don't know if it's worth mentioning, but you can also run into
>> problems using \repeat inside a \relative block if an \unfoldRepeats is
>> used outside the block. F
On 5/15/09 8:43 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
>
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Music inside a \transpose or \chordmode block is absolute, unless a
>> \relative is included inside the the \transpose or \chordmode block. When
>> \relative b
On 5/15/09 5:05 AM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Chip wrote:
>> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Chip wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I think this is the issue mentioned in the Known Issues for Chapter
>>> 1.1.2 "Transpose" in the Notation Reference. However, the two
>>> sentences
On 5/14/09 3:24 PM, "Holger Hellebro" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm a new Lilypond user and I'm really enjoying the program so far. However I
> am having difficulties typesetting a certain trill. You can see in the
> attached picture what I want to achieve. I run into two difficulties:
>
> 1. How to g
On 5/14/09 9:03 AM, "Gilles Sadowski" wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> This solution to the N.C. problem (use r to indicate N.C.)
> ^^^
> Will R also work?
Not right now. I will investigate to see if it is easily done.
Carl
On 5/14/09 8:07 AM, "Tim McNamara" wrote:
>
> into the \chords feels clunky and intrusive to me. I'd prefer to
> minimize putting formatting code in the music content as much as
> possible. Being able to write something like nc1 (or r1) and have it
> interpreted by LilyPond as N.C. would be
On 5/12/09 1:51 PM, "Tim Rowe" wrote:
>
> I can get them all except for the last; when I try to remove the 9th
> (c:m11^7^9) lilypond gets stuck :-(
If you read the notation reference carefully, you'll see that only the
*first* pitch to be removed is preceded by ^. (6 examples in under Exte
On 5/12/09 12:41 PM, "James E. Bailey" wrote:
> I will be the first one to admit that I don't work with chords frequently. I'm
> also trying to understand them. I understand that I can enter c:7 and lilypond
> will recognise that I want to display c7, and display it accordingly. Since I
> want
On 5/12/09 10:35 AM, "Stjepan Brbot" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stjepan,
>>
>>> I'd like to get the following chord "D7/F#". How to define this F#
>>> as bass in
>>> chord? I can use d:7/fis but I get "fis", not wanted F# as bass.
>>
>> If you're using "english.ly
On 5/12/09 4:44 AM, "Tim Rowe" wrote:
>
> Now on to my next exercise -- working out how to print capo chords in
> parentheses after the regular chord, so I get:
> (capo 3) C (A) G7 (E7)
> The nearest I can find is at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg24850.html, but
On 5/5/09 9:03 PM, "Victor Eijkhout" wrote:
> This looks really bad:
>
> harpchords = \relative c' { \time 15/8
>s2^"C" s2^"G/B" s2^"Am" s4. | s2^"Cmaj7/B" s2^"Em/G" s2^"F" s4. |
>s2^G s2^"F/A" s2^"G/B" s4. | s2^"Dm/A" s2^"Dm/F" s2 s4. |
>\repeat volta 2 {
> s2^C s2^"G/B" s2^
Jonathan,
On 5/2/09 2:23 PM, "Jonathan Townes" wrote:
> Hello all,
> Does anyone have suggestions for tweaking the position of accidental in
> chord names. For example, the flat sign in in the chord name Ab? I
> find in the default Lilypond setting the flat symbol is too big and
> too low on th
On 5/2/09 5:50 AM, "Daniel Hulme" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:54:09PM +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
>> Is it worth defining our own function
>> replaceOnly("\\octave", ...)
>> which does
>> re.sub("\\octave[?a-z,A-Z]", ...)
>> or whatever the regex was?
>
> \\octave\b would work f
Christian,
This kind of question is better asked on lilypond-user.
Thanks,
Carel
On 4/30/09 12:57 PM, "grisu_76" wrote:
>
>
> As for I get some helpful hints for solving the spacing-problem in
> pickup-bars starting with a grace note, now I struggle with the
> auto-beaming:
>
> global = {
On 4/30/09 1:36 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I have reworked my tablature.ly according to all suggestions and
> improvements by Neil and Carl.
>
> The modern tab clef seems to be scaling properly, I played a bit with
> some values for staff-space,
> and it looks now as it should be (a
On 4/29/09 3:12 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Neil Puttock schrieb:
>> 2009/4/27 Carl D. Sorensen :
>>
>>> Neil,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your input. I think it's all really good.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/26/09 1:49 PM
On 4/28/09 4:42 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the offer, Chip. I've just finished a preliminary run
>>> through all of the snippets. I downloaded the tarball of the entire
>>> repo and r
On 4/28/09 10:24 AM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Chip wrote:
>>> There are plans to upgrade it to 2.12 but it hasn't happened yet. I
>>> don't understand all of the technical issues but one of the problems
>>> was discussed on a recent thread, which is that someone has to check
>>> all the snipp
On 4/27/09 12:47 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen schrieb:
>>
>> On 4/27/09 3:38 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
>>
>>
> No, I didn't get this mail. I played around with your suggestions and the
> improvements given by Neil and ha
On 4/27/09 3:38 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Neil Puttock schrieb:
>> 2009/4/25 Marc Hohl :
>>
>>> (font-size (- (* num-strings 1.5) 7))
>>> (base-skip (cond ((= 4 num-strings) 1.55)
>>>((= 5 num-strings) 1.84)
>>>((= 6
Neil,
Thanks for your input. I think it's all really good.
On 4/26/09 1:49 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/4/25 Marc Hohl :
>> Hello tablature users*,
>
> Like Carl, I'm not a tablature user, so I can only comment on matters of
> coding.
>
> Some suggestions and thoughts follow below:
>
On 4/25/09 5:38 PM, "Nick Payne" wrote:
> I'm putting together a book of pieces, and using a particular font for
> headers, footers, titles, subtitles, etc. The one place where I haven't
> figured out how to get that font used is for the header text for the table
> of contents that Lilypond cr
On 4/25/09 5:38 PM, "Nick Payne" wrote:
> I'm putting together a book of pieces, and using a particular font for
> headers, footers, titles, subtitles, etc. The one place where I haven't
> figured out how to get that font used is for the header text for the table
> of contents that Lilypond cr
On 4/25/09 3:38 PM, "-Eluze" wrote:
>
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> You use the Internals Reference. You find the object you want engraved
>> under 3.1 All layout objects: 3.1.111 TextSpanner.
>>
>> The IR tells y
On 4/25/09 2:36 PM, "Pekka Siponen" wrote:
> Indeed it (suffix position) is a personal preference, and not correct
> most likely. I find that there is no standard for chord names, they have
> been around only for a short time historically, and mostly everything is
> based on personal preferenc
Looks great, Marc! *Very* nicely done.
On 4/25/09 4:06 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Hello tablature users*,
>
>
> 3) some more tunings are defined:
>guitar-seven-string-tuning
>guitar-drop-d-tuning
>bass-four-string-tuning
>bass-drop-d-tuning
>bass-five-string-tuning
>ba
On 4/25/09 12:52 PM, "Pekka Siponen" wrote:
> Here are some thoughts about the default chords in LilyPond:
>
> 1. The suffixes should not be scaled (see attachment). The weight of the
> smaller character gets too light if it is simply scaled down from the
> original font.
Thanks for making a
On 4/25/09 1:31 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> Perhaps the point I was trying to make got lost in my slightly
> facetious reply: if we're talking about LSR snippets which are in the
> docs, the LSR editor must be mindful of the fact that editing such
> examples in LSR may have no effect, since
On 4/25/09 9:37 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/4/23 Jonathan Kulp :
>> Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Log in to LSR as an editor. (I remember the discussion now;
>>> this isn't your fault)
>>>
>>> 2. Find the "tags" section for each snippet.
>>>
>>> 3. Click on the drop-down menus,
On 4/24/09 4:22 PM, "Peter Chubb" wrote:
>
> I'd really appreciate an appendix or something that gives Lily syntax
> as BNF, or as a syntax diagram. The syntax is very complex, and I've
> been caught out a number of times by things not being as I expected
> them to be from the NR --- not th
On 4/24/09 1:51 PM, "Toine Schreurs" wrote:
> 1. You would need (the nonexisting) RemoveEmptyDrumStaffContext. But
> inspection of engraver-init.ly points to the solution:
Toine,
Thanks for a great, clear answer. You're making a great contribution to
LilyPond by doing this. You not only
On 4/23/09 12:04 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:31:22AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>> And we really (IMO) need to be doing it as part of moving to a 2.12 LSR.
>>> We should also be evaluating:
>&
On 4/23/09 9:31 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:56:05AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> I will admit that "outputting the version number" appears in the
>>> Text list, rather than the titles. In fact, both snippets should
>>> appear in b
On 4/22/09 9:13 AM, "Mischa Falkenburg"
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm using version 2.12.1, and my piece utilizes a GrandStaff with 6 Staffs.
> The .pdf file generated shows all the pages, except for the final page,
> with a big space between two GrandStaffs.
>
> I would like to modify the spa
On 4/22/09 5:09 AM, "Shayne Picard" wrote:
> How can I play a file in midi?
>
See Notation Reference Section 3.5 in the LilyPond documentation.
Thanks,
Carl
>
>
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mai
1 - 100 of 396 matches
Mail list logo
