On 6/1/09 5:29 PM, "Peter Chubb" <lily.u...@chubb.wattle.id.au> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI output
> from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme code used, at
> http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
Peter,
I haven't had a chance to look at your code, since I don't have a login to
your server, and it wasn't attached to your email to the list.
The improved MIDI sounded good to me. I'd like to get it into the
distribution.
As a first step, it could be included in an optional add-in. The way to
make it work is probably to first split your scheme and lilypond code.
I'd recommend that you put your scheme code in a new file that could be
placed in the scm/ directory, perhaps something
like articulation.scm.
And then you'll have your lilypond syntax stuff in articulation.ly file that
can be placed in the ly/ directory and included in a lilypond file.
Then, you can post your articulation.scm and articulation.ly files on the
lilypond-devel list, where it will be reviewed by the experts.
>
> It has before-and-after MIDI samples to listen to, and a full
> description of what the script does and how to use it.
>
> Is there any way that the scheme code can be distributed with
> LilyPond? It's fairly useful now, but could do with going over by
> some real experts for improvement. In particular I'd like to get rid
> of the double pass over all the notes (first to find out what to do
> then to do it), and the hacked up communication between the two
> passes. I'd also like to do something about trills and turns with
> alterations, and do a better calculation for trill duration.
Sounds great. The best way to get a review is to post code on -devel.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
