Hi,
I'm having this issue that the \partcombine command
doesn't behave well when working with several combinations of
\partcombineApart and \partcombineChords.
In this folder
(https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BzSxENzPKZj-
fkE2aVdGbWRTdU05NFMzRHpfLWJ2NGFFejJmRkpCZF9Tc0xTWW9fbVR0OGM&usp=sha
>>
>>- I'm still getting used to the idea of the libraries being dependent
>>on
>>general oll code (for things like setting options, etc.). Part of me
>>would
>>like to have them work on their own, although I guess that would still
>>be
>>possible for that to happen if the library author/maint
Am 10. Februar 2015 05:36:12 MEZ, schrieb Paul Morris :
>Hi Urs,
>Good to hear about the recent progress on this. Looks like you have
>put a
>lot of thought and work into it.
Yes, definitely more than intended ;-)
> Your post was a lot to take in, so
>here
>are just a few thoughts "off the t
Hello Kieren!
I tried your suggestion but got this error message
Starting lilypond 2.19.15 [Untitled]...
Processing
`/var/folders/57/18mvczhs3qj389_tr12w2s34gn/T/frescobaldi-rmF3d0/tmprtTcu5/document.ly'
Parsing...
/var/folders/57/18mvczhs3qj389_tr12w2s34gn/T/frescobaldi-rmF3d0/tmprtTcu5
[Reviving an old thread]
From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: absolute font size issues
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:25:20 +0100 (CET)
>> D'oh. A closer look into the sources of my old project dates 2011,
>> and I did not use \abs-... but \...-mm instead and gave all
>> dimensions in millimetres.
>
>
Hi Urs,
Good to hear about the recent progress on this. Looks like you have put a
lot of thought and work into it. Your post was a lot to take in, so here
are just a few thoughts "off the top of my head."
- What is the plan for existing oll code/content? Will there be a library
for more "bubb
2015-02-09 22:44 GMT+01:00 Thomas Spuhler :
> OK, transferred the file to another box withe same Lilpond version (2.18.2).
>
> I get this:
> $ convert-ly -e --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly
> convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.18.2
> and the first line reads \version "2.18.0"
>
> $ convert-ly -ec --
On Monday, February 09, 2015 10:21:31 PM Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler btspuhler.com> writes:
> > On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:52:41 PM Jim Long wrote:
> > > > but when I convert this file with the command
> > > > convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly
> > > >
> > > > it
Thomas Spuhler btspuhler.com> writes:
>
> On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:52:41 PM Jim Long wrote:
> > > but when I convert this file with the command
> > > convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly
> > >
> > > it adds on top of the file \version "2.16.0"
> > >
> > > I have version
On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:18:17 PM Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:09:59 PM you wrote:
> > One possible explanation is that you have more than one version
> > of convert-ly on your system, perhaps from having installed the
> > software using different methods. If the
On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:52:41 PM Jim Long wrote:
> > but when I convert this file with the command
> > convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly
> >
> > it adds on top of the file \version "2.16.0"
> >
> > I have version 2.18.2 installed.
> >
> > why is it only updating to ver
> but when I convert this file with the command
> convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly
>
> it adds on top of the file \version "2.16.0"
>
> I have version 2.18.2 installed.
>
> why is it only updating to version 2.16.0?
Sorry, I didn't read closely enough and check your args ag
On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:39:57 PM Jim Long wrote:
> > $ locate convert-ly
> > /usr/bin/convert-ly
> > /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1
> > /usr/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1.xz
>
> You likely know, but for the benefit of others who may not,
> locate is not definitive.
> $ locate convert-ly
> /usr/bin/convert-ly
> /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1
> /usr/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1.xz
You likely know, but for the benefit of others who may not,
locate is not definitive. At least on systems I'm familiar with,
locate uses a database which is
On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:09:59 PM you wrote:
> One possible explanation is that you have more than one version
> of convert-ly on your system, perhaps from having installed the
> software using different methods. If the older one is in a path
> that gets searched before the new binary's loc
One possible explanation is that you have more than one version
of convert-ly on your system, perhaps from having installed the
software using different methods. If the older one is in a path
that gets searched before the new binary's location, then your
shell will find and run the old one.
$ fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to build Messiah I downloaded from a WEB -site. There is no
version in the lily files, but the WEB site and also the pdf from the same web-
site says, it's 2.13.8
but when I convert this file with the command
convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8
Hi Michael,
> There were many 8th notes alternating with 8th rests
> (which should be merged by Lilypond, but can't be automatically)
Did you try the merge-rests-on-positioning trick?
\version "2.19.15"
#(define (rest-score r)
(let ((score 0)
(yoff (ly:grob-property-data r 'Y-offset))
I just engraved a piece for which the standard solutions given in this thread
worked especially badly. There were many 8th notes alternating with 8th
rests (which should be merged by Lilypond, but can't be automatically), so
switching back and forth between a polyphonic structure and \oneVoice was
Isn't it frustrating and exciting to be involved with, or at least
aware of or even using, something that is still in the process of
developing? I love EBGaramond, and use it for many of my projects
(using the SC variant in place of bold), but I am eagerly awaiting the
bold release!
~Conor Cook
On Monday, February 09, 2015 04:41:22 AM Kevin Barry wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Thomas Spuhler
> > wrote:
> >
> > Are you sure:
> > see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold
>
> When there is no bold face present, a word processor might `fake' one by
> modifying the
On 2015-02-09 11:56, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello everybody,
then it seems I have been deceived by the fact that there is a separate
file for each bold, italic and bold italic in the .zip provided via the
download link I sent along. Thanks for the information.
Huh? The EB...-0.016.zip on Bitbu
Hello everybody,
then it seems I have been deceived by the fact that there is a separate file
for each bold, italic and bold italic in the .zip provided via the download
link I sent along. Thanks for the information.
Still, I wonder: I tried it out even in leafpad (ubuntu's simple text editor)
On 2015-02-09 05:58, tisimst wrote:
This is correct. LibreOffice does fake italic, bold, and bold-italic if
that variant doesn't exist. LilyPond, however, makes no attempt at this
and just reverts to the closest one that is installed, which is usually
the "regular" variant. [...]
On Mon, Feb 9,
Am 09.02.2015 um 09:56 schrieb Matteo Ceccarello:
Here I see room for starting some discussion on automated testing. I
think that example files can serve also as test files, to check that
code changes or version changes do not break things. Github has an
associated continuous integration servi
Thanks for the help everyone. All fixed.
Craig
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 6:56:24 PM Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Am 09.02.2015 um 09:02 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've still had no joy trying to get this makefile to find openlilylib.
> Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> Craig
>
>
> As was sug
Am 09.02.2015 um 09:02 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi all,
I've still had no joy trying to get this makefile to find openlilylib.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Craig
As was suggested several times you have to add openlilylib to LilyPond's
include path (as explained here:
http://lilypond.org/
Hi all,
as I've already expressed privately I think this is a great project -
thank you for following up on my ideas. If I get the README right this
will in fact overcome several limitations of my so-far manual
approach. I hope we'll be able to make that generally available in the
most straig
Hi all,
I've still had no joy trying to get this makefile to find openlilylib. Does
anyone have any ideas?
Craig
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 2:22:03 PM Kevin Barry wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Craig Dabelstein <
> craig.dabelst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have experience wit
29 matches
Mail list logo
