>>
>>- I'm still getting used to the idea of the libraries being dependent
>>on
>>general oll code (for things like setting options, etc.). Part of me
>>would
>>like to have them work on their own, although I guess that would still
>>be
>>possible for that to happen if the library author/maintainer chose to
>>do it
>>that way.
>
>Technically it's not more than a common directory and include path. So
>yes, it would still be pissible to use openLilyLib as a "distribution
>channel" for a self-contained piece of code.
"possible " of course ... (hate writing on the mobile)
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
