On Monday, February 09, 2015 04:41:22 AM Kevin Barry wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Thomas Spuhler <thomas.spuh...@btspuhler.com > > > wrote: > > > > Are you sure: > > see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold > > When there is no bold face present, a word processor might `fake' one by > modifying the regular (roman) face. I don't know if that is what happened > in your attachment, but the zip archive for the EB Garamond font linked to > in your first message does not contain any files for a bold face. Normally > a typeface has separate files for regular, bold, italic, bold-italic and so > on, which LilyPond will attempt to use, but in this case it can't because > that file presumably doesn't exist on your system. > > Elsewhere on the website the author does mention bold in the list of goals, > but it does not appear in the specimen pdf which suggests it is not > implemented yet. Yep, I realized it after firing off the message. They do substitutes. -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler
All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
