Dear Joram,
thanks first, this look much better this way.
About your question about hyphening, I just took it from the example
given in the manual and tried and failed...
Best thanks and happy new year!
F
2014-12-31 20:11 GMT-05:00, Noeck :
> Hi again François,
>
> there two limiting factors t
Hi again François,
there two limiting factors to my answer: 1) I did not write many
gregorian chants and 2) Lilypond has some limitations in this area.
But there are a few things I know how to improve and I have a few
questions for you:
Is it a convention in gregorian chants to have the hyphens
Happy new year François,
I guess you would have to use a normal star like so: "*"
The double quotes are needed.
Ora -- te, "*" cae -- li
You can tweak the lyrics font if you want another font for this symbol:
\tweak font-name #"Century Schoolbook L" "*"
Cheers,
Joram
_
Hello,
This is my code (after the sanctus example in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/typesetting-gregorian-chant
with \version "2.18.0") :
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}
\include "gregorian.ly"
\score {
<<
\new VaticanaVoice = "cantus" {
\clef "vaticana-do3"
f
\[
Hello, I am searching the star for gregorian typesetting.
Like the one between Rorate, * coeli in
http://www.cantoeprego.it/canto/png/1054.111.rorate.caeli.png
Thanks in advance and happy new year to all!
Francois
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypo
All,
I've been thinking about what has been done on the alternative music fonts
and I thought I'd pose a question, welcoming any feedback. Here we go...
With the workflow I use to create the font files, if there's a glyph that I
don't replace, I just keep it the way it is found in Emmentaler (e.g
tisimst gmail.com> writes:
>
> Kieren MacMillan wrote
> > Any hints, for example, on what ‘ratio' actually does, or
[..]
> effect of "ratio". Seems like a "bug" to me that increasing "ratio" >
doesn't
> change the shape of the tie curve very much if the tie is at its
> "height-limit", but maybe
Dave wrote
> I've been including english.ly in my files, but I'm considering dropping
> that and just using the default (Dutch),
> which as far as I can tell will just require me to remember the es/is
> alterations, since the English note names are the same as the Dutch.
>
> Is there anything be
I've been including english.ly in my files, but I'm considering dropping that
and just using the default (Dutch),
which as far as I can tell will just require me to remember the es/is
alterations, since the English note names are the same as the Dutch.
Is there anything besides the note-names
On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 18:11 +, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Original Message -
> From: "David Sumbler"
> >
> > Clearly I am doing something wrong - perhaps it is to do with the way I
> > have entered my tempo markings. Just to make things clearer, I am
> > setting a saxophone quartet (that
Trevor,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
>
> tisimst wrote Wednesday, December 31, 2014 5:09 PM
>
> > I took a look into the source code and here's what it says about each of
> the
> > "details" properties (found in 2.19.15 "lily/tie.cc" with the default
> values
> > found
tisimst wrote Wednesday, December 31, 2014 5:09 PM
> I took a look into the source code and here's what it says about each of the
> "details" properties (found in 2.19.15 "lily/tie.cc" with the default values
> found on IR web page and in "define-grobs.scm"):
>
[snip]
>
> It certainly does say t
Abraham,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:47 AM, tisimst
wrote:
> tisimst wrote
> > I took a look into the source code and here's what it says about each of
> > the "details" properties (found in 2.19.15 "lily/tie.cc" with the default
> > values found on IR web page and in "define-grobs.scm"):
>
> Hmm
Original Message -
From: "David Sumbler"
Clearly I am doing something wrong - perhaps it is to do with the way I
have entered my tempo markings. Just to make things clearer, I am
setting a saxophone quartet (that I wrote in 1978!); I want tempo
markings to appear once above the top li
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Abraham,
>
>
> Is the documentation in the NR not being derived from the doc string of
> the interface?
>
>
Sorry, I mean "IR".
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lis
Hi Abraham,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:09 AM, tisimst
wrote:
>
>
> It certainly does say that these are supposed to be visible in the IR, but
> why aren't they? What can we do to get things like this there? I'm happy to
> assist if I can be given some direction...
>
I'm a little mystified at wh
tisimst wrote
> I took a look into the source code and here's what it says about each of
> the "details" properties (found in 2.19.15 "lily/tie.cc" with the default
> values found on IR web page and in "define-grobs.scm"):
Hmmm...
Looking at "tie-details.cc", I see different numbers (v. 2.19.15)
Hey Phil,
That's what I did. l had tried that once before but without any luck. The
score is a bit complex. Starts off with 4 part SATB then interlude then S
S1 A then T T1 B then interlude then finishes in SATB.
I had to work with each part to get it all lined up properly but finally
got it done
On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 11:52 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Am 31.12.2014 00:32, schrieb David Sumbler:
> > On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 22:04 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> >> Am 30.12.2014 13:16, schrieb David Sumbler:
> >>> Further to my query (below) yesterday about varying ralls and accels in
> >>> mi
Chris,
I think this would work better if you gave each musician their full measure
rests when they are not singing/playing and then let Lily remove them when
they are not needed. Something like:
\score {
<<
\new Staff { \relative c'' { R1 R1 c4 d e f f e d c R1 R1 } }
\new ChoirStaff
<<
\new
Kieren MacMillan wrote
> I tried that… Unfortunately, it says “More information on the allowed
> parameters for a grob can be found by looking at the top of the Internals
> Reference page for each interface having a details property.” and I
> haven’t been able to find the “more information” they’re
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> See the following :
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> \paper {
> paper-width = 100
> paper-height = 50
> ragged-right = ##f
> indent = 0
> tagline = ##f
> }
>
> { a'1
Hi David,
See the following :
\version "2.19.15"
\paper {
paper-width = 100
paper-height = 50
ragged-right = ##f
indent = 0
tagline = ##f
}
{ a'1 -\tweak thickness #.5 ^(-\tweak stencil ##f ^~ a') }
{ \tieUp a'1 -\tweak thickness #.5 ~ a' }
Slur is naturally slightly mor "parapolic"
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kieren,
>
> Here's a bad one :
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> \paper {
> paper-width = 100
> paper-height = 30
> ragged-right = ##f
> indent = 0
> tagline = ##f
> }
>
> { a'1 -
Hi Kieren,
Here's a bad one :
\version "2.19.15"
\paper {
paper-width = 100
paper-height = 30
ragged-right = ##f
indent = 0
tagline = ##f
}
{ a'1 -\tweak thickness #.5 ^(-\tweak stencil ##f ^~ a') }
happy new year !!
Pierre
2014-12-31 16:35 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik :
> Kieren,
>
>
Kieren,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > I think that you should investigate the numerous properties listed under
> details (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/tie) for
> finding the basic shape.
>
> I t
Hi David,
> I think that you should investigate the numerous properties listed under
> details (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/tie) for
> finding the basic shape.
I tried that… Unfortunately, it says “More information on the allowed
parameters for a grob can be found by
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>>
>> Without trying it out I'd expect Janek's \shapeII (in openlilylib) and
>> using it with polar coordinates should help you.
>>
>>
> But then you'd lose the use of the function f
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 31.12.2014 um 15:26 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I’m putting together a stylesheet based on mid-20th-Century
>> Warner-Chappell musical theatre vocal books, and would like to mimic
>> more closely their tie shape:
>>
>>
>>
Am 31.12.2014 um 15:26 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hello all,
I’m putting together a stylesheet based on mid-20th-Century
Warner-Chappell musical theatre vocal books, and would like to mimic
more closely their tie shape:
As you can see, it’s nearly “parabolic" (i.e., the curve doesn’t really
inc
Have you trying the \shape command?
\version "2.19.15"
\relative c'' {
\shape #'((0 . 0.2) (1.5 . 1) (0 . 0) (0 . 0.2)) Tie
a1 ^~ | a1
}
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I’m putting togethe
Hi Jacques,
I've attached my makefile. You can compare it to pp. 50-52 of the Lilypond
"Usage" manual, which is what I adapted it from. Any advice would be much
appreciated.
Craig
On Thu Jan 01 2015 at 12:29:28 AM Jacques Menu
wrote:
> Hello Craig,
>
> Tabs play an important role in makefiles
Hello Craig,
Tabs play an important role in makefiles, and the bullets on the first two
lines are suspect to me. Maybe an effect of copying into your E-Mail message.
Can you supply as attachments the original and modified makefiles? The result
of « diff originalOne yours » will be instructive.
Hello all,
I’m putting together a stylesheet based on mid-20th-Century Warner-Chappell
musical theatre vocal books, and would like to mimic more closely their tie
shape:
As you can see, it’s nearly “parabolic" (i.e., the curve doesn’t really
increase dramatically near the noteheads) and non
2014-12-30 20:33 GMT+01:00 Stan Mulder :
> I have a fretboard problem.
>
> I have defined a new fretboard for a plectrum banjo. Everything is working
> properly when I specify a chord, except when I specify a SLASH chord, i.e.,
> a chord with a designation for the bass player. So for example, if I
2014-12-31 12:00 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht :
>
> \noBeam after the third and fourth notes should do what you want.
>
> Ah, yes. And it is documented on the cited page of the manual. I should
have read more carefully.
Adding \noBeam to each individual note might be a bit cumbersome when it
comes to
It does perfectly the trick. Many thanks und vielen Dank!
Francois
2014-12-31 3:16 GMT-05:00, Marc Hohl :
> Am 31.12.2014 um 02:45 schrieb Alicuota618:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I found long ago a way to center rests in single-staff polyphony. But
>> I dont find it anymore, neither in doc or google (or did
Hello Helge,
\noBeam after the third and fourth notes should do what you want.
%%
\version "2.18"
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4 \key es \major
\voiceTwo as8\> c f\noBeam
\voiceOne as\noBeam c f\! |
}
%%
HTH, Simon
Am 31.12.2014 10:11, schrieb Helge Kruse:
Am 31.12.2014 00:32, schrieb David Sumbler:
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 22:04 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Am 30.12.2014 13:16, schrieb David Sumbler:
Further to my query (below) yesterday about varying ralls and accels in
midi, how do I actually get these to work at all?
At the moment the articulat
Sorry, hit the send key too early.
The documentation about beams (
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/beams) suggests that
you can enabel and disable automatic beaming in the measure. In the
following example I expected the last three notes to have the stem up like
in a voiceOne
The documentation about beams (
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/beams) suggests that
you can enabel and disable automatic beaming in the measure. In the
following example I expected the last three notes to have the stem up like
in a voiceOne context:
___
Am 31.12.2014 um 02:45 schrieb Alicuota618:
Hello,
I found long ago a way to center rests in single-staff polyphony. But
I dont find it anymore, neither in doc or google (or did I use wrong
words for searching).
To be more explicit, lilypond gives naturally the first rests of the
attachment (be
42 matches
Mail list logo
