All, I've been thinking about what has been done on the alternative music fonts and I thought I'd pose a question, welcoming any feedback. Here we go...
With the workflow I use to create the font files, if there's a glyph that I don't replace, I just keep it the way it is found in Emmentaler (e.g., the shape-notes and chant notation, etc.). My question is this: Is this necessary to keep including them? The truth is, there are a bunch of glyphs that I NEVER EVER change from one font file to the next. Since we have access to all of these less-common glyphs as a part of Emmentaler, I don't see a big need to keep propagating them. That being said, if no one complains too loudly, I think I may remove support for them. What think ye all? Happy New Years! -Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Alternative-fonts-glyph-support-tp169988.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
