Caio,
On 10 Dec 2011, at 00:03, Caio Barros wrote:
> I just remembered a piece by Luciano Berio: Leaf, the second of 6 encores for
> piano edited by Universal edition that has this (a beautiful piece by the
> way). In two cases the dynamics go right before the stems and everything goes
> a l
For a piece I'm writing out, this is what I have at the moment:
% Created on Sun Aug 28 18:32:17 NZST 2011
\version "2.15.20-1"
\header {
%{ headers }%
}
#(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape)
#(set-global-staff-size 18)
\book {
\paper {
ragged-last-bottom =
Sorry, just remember another: Klavierstücke by stockhausen also edited by
Universal Editions. I'm looking here and numbers 1-5 all have examples of
that. The dynamics never clash. Normally when there is only 1 dynamic for a
groups of notes it goes at the left. When there are changes of dynamics
dur
I just remembered a piece by Luciano Berio: Leaf, the second of 6 encores
for piano edited by Universal edition that has this (a beautiful piece by
the way). In two cases the dynamics go right before the stems and
everything goes a little to the right and in another it goes above an
ascending cross
On 12/9/11 4:04 PM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>NR 4.5.1 Horizontal spacing overview says
>
> The most common shortest duration is determined as follows: in every
> measure, the shortest duration is determined. The most common
> shortest duration is taken as the basis for the spacin
On 9 December 2011 23:40, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
> This is one of those situations that falls into the "uncertain
> desired output" category.
> Shifting the dynamic to the left or right dissociates it from the
> note, and whiting it out covers up
Hello,
NR 4.5.1 Horizontal spacing overview says
The most common shortest duration is determined as follows: in every
measure, the shortest duration is determined. The most common
shortest duration is taken as the basis for the spacing, with the
stipulation that this shortest duration s
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
> This is one of those situations that falls into the "uncertain desired
> output" category.
> Shifting the dynamic to the left or right dissociates it from the note,
> and whiting it out covers up a good portion of the stem.
>
>
Yes. I'm making an editio
Le Dec 9, 2011 à 11:31 PM, Xavier Scheuer a écrit :
> On 9 December 2011 15:30, Caio Barros wrote:
>> I don't know if this is old news but it seems that the dynamics texts clash
>> with the stems of cross-staff knee beams:
>>
>> \version "2.12.3"
>>
>> \new GrandStaff <<
>> \new Staff = "PnRH
On 9 December 2011 15:30, Caio Barros wrote:
> I don't know if this is old news but it seems that the dynamics texts clash
> with the stems of cross-staff knee beams:
>
> \version "2.12.3"
>
> \new GrandStaff <<
> \new Staff = "PnRH" {
> \clef "F_8"
> \relative g,, {
> \override Be
I don't know if this is old news but it seems that the dynamics texts clash
with the stems of cross-staff knee beams:
\version "2.12.3"
\new GrandStaff <<
\new Staff = "PnRH" {
\clef "F_8"
\relative g,, {
\override Beam #'auto-knee-gap = #1
gis8 \fff \change Staff = "PnLH" a
Caio,
On 9 December 2011 11:47, Caio Barros wrote:
>
>> Hey Caio,
>>
>> Here's some text that will help you make the glissandos longer:
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/spanners
>>
>>
> Thank you! This will do the trick.
>
> Also, this type of multi-voice solution is no
>
>
> Hey Caio,
>
> Here's some text that will help you make the glissandos longer:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/spanners
>
>
Thank you! This will do the trick.
Also, this type of multi-voice solution is not necessary in LilyPond
> version 2.14 - chord glissandos are cr
Le Dec 9, 2011 à 12:30 PM, Caio Barros a écrit :
> I'm writing a part for 5 violins in divisi in which they make a glissando and
> I want to add space between the two chords because the accidentals make it
> looks to confusing.
> Using \override NoteColumn X-offset doesn't seems to work because
I'm writing a part for 5 violins in divisi in which they make a glissando
and I want to add space between the two chords because the accidentals make
it looks to confusing.
Using \override NoteColumn X-offset doesn't seems to work because at least
in version 2.12.3 I need to add hidden voices to ma
On 09/12/11 20:39, Fidler Aoileann wrote:
Hello again,
That is good thanks.
Unfortunately I seem to have lost the benefit of relative c!
I have
score
{\relative c'''
\header {piece = "Les Petits Deshayes"}
{ \clef treble \key g \major \time 2/4
then the music
}
}
but it is printing an octave t
Fidler Aoileann writes:
> Hello again,
>
> That is good thanks.
> Unfortunately I seem to have lost the benefit of relative c!
You haven't. The entire header is typeset in \relative c'''. As it
does not contain any musical notes, this is somewhat hard to see.
> I have
> score
>
> {\relativ
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:54:12AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> trying to compile a function manipulating the NoteColumn with "2.15.20" I
> noticed some differences to "2.14.2"
> So I wrote a test-function to display the grob-length:
>
> \version "2.14.2"
> %\version "2.15.20"
>
> #(define (x
Hello again,
That is good thanks.
Unfortunately I seem to have lost the benefit of relative c!
I have
score
{\relative c'''
\header {piece = "Les Petits Deshayes"}
{ \clef treble \key g \major \time 2/4
then the music
}
}
but it is printing an octave too low.
When I added a dash to the first
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:23:23AM +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >On the other hand, let say I send you the entire choral symphony in a
> >folder. Then you are left going through the syntax looking for the
> >problem.
>
> Do you have any suggestions for how this should be fixed?
>
> Post a lin
20 matches
Mail list logo
