There is nothing about the Metronome Mark in the Changing Defaults chapter.
I have already ready the documentation. I figured out how to move it up or
down, but not left or right. In general, I think it would look better over
the time signature instead of over the first note.
Stephen
object. I need to
remember that 'extra-offset' works with every grob. I even got 'text' from
the text-interface to not create errors, but it does not affect anything.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &quo
t;
Or maybe demonstrating how to use script-priority might be more interesting
in the Common tweak section although it is not a common tweak I suppose.
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
of \markup are affected by it would help a lot, I think.
So I guess I narrowed it down to I would like to see it under 7.4 Text
markup.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "l
e shifting would still be necessary, although maybe right or left
alignment would work better using Rehearsal Mark.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
Sent: T
Thanks, 'cause even though I glibly talked about alignment, I did not know
how it could be done. Now I know.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
|"
That in the second example, you have to change the padding for
RehearsalMark, TextScript padding won't affect the rehearsal mark. The two
examples are nearly identical. The advantage of the second is that you can
line it up to the barline explicitly instead of eyeballing it and lining
same
thing.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: TextScript
I think the thing I did not find intuitive is
\mark has evolved into a way to put text over a barline, but you cannot use
\markup to put text over a barline, only over a note.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lily-devel"
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:32 PM
is the kind of sentence that I keep in the back of my brain,
until I figure out whether there really is a distiction between the two and
what it is.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
strings generally; not just rehearsal marks anymore.
And I agree that the tricks you are describing in this thread and others,
Mats, should be added to the documentation.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[
Well, I am really just asking whether markup is more than a text script or
not. If it would cause less confusion to regularize the terminology than it
would to not change it, then it would be a good thing, but I aggree that
that would be unlikely.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From
Yes, I know; I am just saying that the first time I responded to the thread,
I misinterpreted your question and the second time I responded, Mats had
already given the feedback/information/help you needed. Sorry.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EM
et, object yes,
engraver yes, event no.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lily-devel"
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: Another documentation iss
(from 1.2 Automated engraging) that
defines a goal I am not sure all the developers are on board with:
Over the course of years, the software can be refined to do more and more
automatically, so manual overrides are less and less necessary.>
Stephen
- Original Message -
From:
Feta font, but
I do not look forward to a day when it is easy to mix the fonts since they
will only be made to look good with themselves, for instance.
Lilypond's ultumate goal is to enable better perfomances:
better typography translates to better performances>
Stephen
- Original
is a conscious choice to change
the philosophy.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lily-devel" ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
ld be good for it.
If all else fails, simply defining who the user is would do it. Lilypond was
originally developed for a certain kind of user. In fact, it was written for
only one person.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
You did a very good job on the Introduction, I can't tell it was written by
a native Dutch speaker and I can tell when something has been translated
from a different language.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph
Well, you know, I am looking at the documentation for 2.4.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lily-devel"
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: Another docu
Well no,
The manual tells the developers what the user is going to expect from the
program and that in turn guides the development. That's what I mean.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAI
Yeah, thanks, I agree, I like to hear that.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "lily-devel"
Sent: Friday, May 20,
velopers reminding each other of it or
putting it in that context on a case by case basis. I am a very literal
person who likes things to be terribly explicit, most people do not need
that, so I understand there is no real issue here, it is just that my
communication style differs from oth
define the
procedures public in order to define the alists public? Or are they public
only to make the procedures themselves accessible to the user?
Do the examples in input/no-notation show up anywhere in the documentation?
Stephen
\version "2.4.0"
\header {
texidoc = "@cin
can read and understand computer languages, but the comments are
not always so clear. Perhaps if I compared midi.scm to the other files in
its directory it would become clear, but the code works and I am focusing on
what it does rather than how it does it. The worst thing about the TODO and
your
ChangeLog entry:
2005-06-25 Stephen Charles McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* scm/midi.scm: changed midi volumes in absolute-volume-alist from
0.05 - 1.00 to 0.25 - 1.00
* scm/midi.scm: moved the default-instrument-equalizer procedure to just
under the insturment-equalizer-alist it
ow each note with \natural to put a natural before each
note.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Okonsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 2:27 AM
Subject: Naturals on all notes
How to get naturals on all non-altered notes by default?
ere it
is.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: midi.scm patched
Stephen wrote:
a pass at providing
what kind of kaos that might
create.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Okonsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mehmet Okonsar"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 4:00 AM
Subject: Re:
Yep, you are right. I added windows style line endings to the original file,
then ran 'diff -u' again and got this smaller file.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Johannes Schindelin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and Linux versions of
Lilypond maximizes the likelyhood that Windows
versions would come out regularly and remain compatible with the Linux
version.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Bertalan Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Schneelocke" <[EMAIL PROTEC
I am resending the original message with the correct patch. Is it OK to
include the ChangeLog entry as part of the message?
ChangeLog entry:
2005-06-25 Stephen Charles McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* scm/midi.scm: changed midi volumes in absolute-volume-alist from
0.05 - 1.00 to 0.25
assocation should be processing or editing.
Processing! Using Cygwin, if I click on an .ly file I process it, if I
right-click it I can edit it in Notepad. This seems to be a good system to
continue.
Stephen
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
li
{ ... } } ...
each \score block will print out in a separate file.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Laura Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "lilypond
iece I was working on
when I first noticed the problem. That way I am placing the problem in a
realistic context
rather rather than a simplified one.
Stephen
.
\version "2.4.6"
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a5")
linewidth = 60\staffspace
bottommargin = 9\mm
afterti
#'(revert-auto-beam-setting '(1 16 4 8) 'Staff)
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lilypond Devel" ;
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 4:29 PM
Subject: Re
Luckily, I was just looking at that. Look up 'New dynamic marks' in the
documentation.
= #(make-dynamic-script "ffff")
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Okonsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:07 AM
After adding the patch to my own installation, I discovered it had an error
in it.
The windows line ending do need to be removed, but I think you can remove
them from the patch before applying it.
Sorry,
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PR
las' '\forceAlteration' puts a natural or accidental
in every note, not just the first occurance of every note within a measure.
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Options\General and
change the 'Default character encoding'.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Bertalan Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mehmet Okonsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: utf-8 encoding te
Sorry, I missed your response.
The size of the plus sign looks alright to me, but yes, it should be
perfectly centered.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel
rride PianoStaff.KeySignature #'print-function = ##f
I mistakenly thought the staffs were not breaking right, but that was due to
raggedright = ##t
I am working on examples and adding it to my project now.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Okonsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sen
Attached is my example using atonicKey for Atonal Music by Schoenberg.
I plan on doing a snippet too, but I will look for a measure which
demonstrates everything it can do after I get it working in my main project.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Okonsar&quo
that I would like to create my own custom overrides for
signatures like 5/4, but I don't understand it well enough. The convenience
of not having to manually beam every last note in a piece is worth the
effort.
NOTE: this has been stuck in my outbox for nearly two weeks.
Stephen
- Ori
he parser, not how it affects the
output. Has anyone used it?
NOTE: this has been stuck in my outbox for nearly two weeks.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lilypond Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:15 AM
Subject: Re:
signature.
Would you get a group of three followed by a group of two if you reversed
the order of the overrides?
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 5 8) 3 8 'Score)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 5 8) 2 8 'Score)
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "
(0 . 1)
(1 . 1)
(2 . 1)
(3 . 1)
(4 . 1))
\set Score . extraNatural = ##f #})
y and
understandably so. Lilypond's paper output will always have the higher
priority.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; "Mehmet
Okonsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 18, 200
e to attempt to make things simple enough that even I can understand them
whether as a user of as a developer.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; "
(1 . 1)
(2 . 1)
(3 . 1)
(4 . 1))
\set Score . extraNatural = ##f
\override Score . KeySignature #'print-function = ##f
do this thing
right when I decided that of course I need to apply the patch to a newer
version of Lilypond, checked Lilypond 2.6.1 and realized it had already been
applied.
Thanks.
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
ecause it reduces the amount of scrolling
needed to read each page.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Heikki Junes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog Do
rearranging the order of the
explanation until I understand it. That is harder to do if I have to scroll
between paragraphs.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Heikki Junes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Han-Wen Nienhuys&
I? To recap, my idea is to keep the key
signature and accidental engraver and just suppress the printing of the key
signature as a way to print flats when you need them.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Sven Axelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 29,
?
Stephen
\version "2.6.1"
atonicKey =
#(def-music-function (parser location) ()
#{ #(ly:export (make-music 'EventChord
'origin $location
'elements (list (make-music 'KeyChangeEvent
5 {e'2 e' e' e' e'}}
\new Staff {\clef bass
c'4 c' c' c' \break | % this break does!
c' c' c' c'}
>>
\layout {
\context { \Voice \remove Forbid_line_break_engraver }
raggedright = ##t
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Baca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: Previous discussion on tuplet breaking ove
false even if the Key Engraver
is not removed.
Stephen
Other than that, I propose that we accept ly/bagpipe.ly -- particularly
since
it doesn't change anything for non-bagpipe music. I've already added
docs for bagpipe stuff. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
__
- Original Message -
From: "Sven Axelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Stephen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Graham Percival'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'lily-devel'"
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 11:04
is a regression?
Stephen
\version "2.6.1"
atonicKey =
#(def-music-function (parser location) ()
#{ #(ly:export (make-music 'EventChord
'origin $location
'elements (list (make-music 'KeyChangeEvent
It should be called one or more measure rest, but there is no word for that
in the english language. Integral Measure Rest?
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:37 AM
tion to make the Lilypond syntax as simple as
possible and I practically threw a party at the demise of \notes at the
2.2 --> 2.4 change, but I think you could spend your time more productively
than finding ways to get rid of \score and raggedright. \score is already
optional for extremely
John,
This is excellent. I want to let you know about the Lilypond page in the
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "John Mandereau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lily devel"
Cc: "Fairchild" <[EM
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: warning: no feasible beam position
Stephen wrote:
Hi,
Is this a
ying to respond to multiple
postings of this thread with one posting. So I'll send this and respond in
separate postings to the rest of the thread if I think of something more to
say.
Stephen
I'm not sure what the right solution i
rsions of D.S, D.C with and without codas
and with different notations ("segno" versus a segno mark, for example)
that it would be very hard both to implement and to use. Also, the MIDI
support is mainly intended to be used for proof reading ("proof
listening")
a score while typesetting
the dash-period, rather than the dash-fraction. The default
dash-fraction is 3.0, so the following will give you long, closely spaced
dashes:
\once \override TextSpanner #'dash-fraction = #0.88
\once \override TextSpanner #'dash-period = #5.0
Stephen
thanks, arno
\i
; }
\new Staff \with {
\consists "Mark_engraver"
}
{ c'1 c' }
>>
}
Try this instead:
\version "2.7.40"
{
\new Score \with {
\remove "Mark_engraver"
}
<<
\new Staff \with {
\consists "Mark_engraver&q
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "lily-devel"
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Some newbie troubles, especially with text
Quoti
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "lily-devel"
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:09 PM
Graham Percival wrote:
On 20-Mar-06, at 8:18 AM, Stephe
faults. I think the serious
professional user can already get Lilypond to output in the engraving style
he needs more easily than any other program.
Stephen
This seems
to make things difficult when someone tries to maintain a part that
has to be transposed a couple different ways, or printed on
even if it has no effect. Let's not forget that the
user can add and remove contexts as in this example from 8.4.1 Polymetric
notation:
\layout {
\context { \Score
\remove "Timing_translator"
\remove "Default_bar_line_engraver&qu
\consists "Hara_kiri_engraver"
} <<
\new Staff = "upper" \upper
\new Staff = "lower" \lower
>>
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
There are many possible character encodings, is there one that TexInfo and
HTML do support?
Stephen
From: "John Mandereau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 6:24 AM
Graham Percival wrote:
I _really_ do not want to touch texinfo right now. The .tely file has
Where did the log go in Lilypond 2.8.4?
I no longer can read any error messages when I make a mistake.
I prefer running Lilypond in a command window; this does not work for the
newest mingw binary.
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: Lilypond 2.8.4
Stephen schreef:
Where did the log go in Lilyp
- Original Message -
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: Lilypond 2.8.4
Stephen schreef:
- Original Message - F
writes:
Hi there,
the first test results are finally available. Grovel at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/v2.8.4/index.html
But there is no such link.
Stephen
and see what features we broken in the latest release!
Awesome! Kudos!
___
lilypon
I have experimented since I first brought up this problem, by installing
both Lilypond 2.9.8 and 2.8.3 which both work in the cmd.exe box. So, I
don't know why, but I think something is wrong with Lilypond 2.8.4. Doesn't
anybody else have this problem?
is' d' e') f'4-.(\< f'-.)\! | f'4.->(\> e'8) d'( c'
b a)\! |
<<
{ \stemNeutral gis( e') e'-. e'-. e'-. e'-. e'-. e'-. | }
{ s8\< s s s\! s\> s s s\! }
>>
e'2\< d'8( c'
how I hid the triplet bracket. The overrides must be reverted at the
next triplet.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: hairpin cresc.
you working on that uses figured bass?
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Julien Salort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "lilypond devel" ;
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: Figured bass
7;-. g'-.} \times 2/3 {g'[-. g'-. g']-.} | g'4 r r2
\times 2/3 {c'8-.\ff g'( e')} \times 2/3 {c'[-. e'( c')]}
\times 2/3 {g-. c'( g)} \times 2/3 {e[-. g( e)]} |
c4-. r \clef bass c,-. r | c,-. r
\bar "|."
}
Stephen
<>\version
I see the 3 and stacatto dot do not collide in the png although they appear
to in the pdf. Perhaps the only question is how to raise the markup text?
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lilypond devel"
Sent: Sunday, Marc
ra doesn't anticipate the beat. One of the pleas I
have to the programmers is to distinguish the appogiatura from the gracenote
in midi.
Stephen
<><>top = {
\key a \minor
\clef G
\time 3/4
\tempo 4=120
#(set-accidental-style 'modern)
% \partial 8 s8 \bar &quo
As usual, I realized the bug warning at the end of the grace section in the
documentation applies here. I fixed the problem by adding a grace skip to
all the other staves.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lilypond devel"
Speaking of using Scheme to produce Bach's Prelude, I re-adapted the
music-box.ly example to produce the entire prelude.
Stephen
\paper {
linewidth = 160\mm
indent = 10\mm
bottommargin = 10\mm
}
\layout {
}
\include "deutsch.ly"
% TODO: ask if it needs to have so man
e name and compressed the dynamic range. It would be nice if people tried
it and offered feedback on whether I struck the right balance of keeping the
dynamic levels discreet while keeping pianissimo audible.
I don't think the 0.01 - 0.20 range is audible at reasonable volume levels.
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
There is a need for a book scope \midi block that has a one second silence
inserted between scores analogous to beforetitlespace in page layout.
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
expects a the lilypond files submitted
there to produce midi files. Given the state of midi in lilypond, it may be
premature to make that a requirement, but it is.
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
the sharper
endings and beginnings, but your short slurs will look fat.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:07 AM
Subject: second developers' meeting in Koblenz
Here are the results from the se
Known bug. You need to add an AbsoluteDynamicEvent (using e.g. \f) before
any
cresc or dim can be used. See scm/define-music-types.scm for ideas.
Erik>
Actually, this is the piece that sent me looking for a solution. Perhaps
because I am using Lilypond 2.4.3?
Stephen
<>taps = {
#(defi
arters } \layout { } }
\score { \header { piece = "Taps" } \transpose c c'' { \taps } \layout { } }
\midi { \context { \Voice \remove Span_dynamic_performer } }
}
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen&qu
only change the dynamic of the second note. If the hairpin is
attached to only one note, it should only change the dynamics of the notes
following the hairpin. Etc.
Again, I am curious to know which file this code is in in the sources.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Sandber
|."
Note the 'g,8.\mf\<' beginning. An absolute dynamic did preceed the hairpin,
but on the same note.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
ace which function is using the info in the absolute-volume-alist than it
is to search for the engravers and performers in the sources.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[E
is is actually happening. (i.e., not
where the error occurs, but where the midi volume values are determined.)
Stephen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
That's true.
I can't think of any solution other than to assume mf in the absence of any
dynamic indication.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "David Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Span_dynamic_performer
ove Voice.Span_dynamic_performer
\consists PianoStaff.Span_dynamic_performer
to controll the scope of the dynamic changes, whether they only affect the
voice, the staff, the piano part, of the entire score. I don't know if that
is possible yet.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Sandberg"
h a regular tuple. I
think if really means just the group of notes within the span.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 3:19 AM
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
