Patch to fix `make all'

2009-01-06 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, I can't do a `make all' on the current git master, and this patch fixes the problem. Can someone apply it? Thanks, Patrick From ab347e3e065dc69c4630be331d52aaa1db905ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:20:51 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] F

Re: [frogs] Adding docstring support to def-grace-function

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 1/7/09 12:51 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote: >> >> For A., using acciaccatura as an example, I propose the following syntax: >> >> acciaccatura = >> #(def-grace-functi

Re: [frogs] Adding docstring support to def-grace-function

2009-01-08 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 1/7/09 12:03 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote: >> >>> A syntax that would not require a convert-ly rule would be >>> >>> acciaccatura = >>> #(def-grace-function startAcciaccaturaM

Re: Git patch won't apply

2009-01-10 Thread Patrick McCarty
. If you open the > file in an editor and remove the extra space in that line, it will apply. That is very strange. I don't know what happened there. I just re-created the patch, and this one applies fine (attached) with `git am'. Thanks, Patrick From 865a09c76b8246361255dcd5cf93a8d61

`make all' fails

2009-01-10 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, `make all' fails on current master. Is this because the new directory, Documentation/es/topdocs/, doesn't have a makefile yet? touch ./out/dummy.dep echo '*' > ./out/.gitignore make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pnorcks/git/lilypond/Documentation/es' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/pnor

[PATCH] Add docstring support to def-grace-function

2009-01-10 Thread Patrick McCarty
this work? I've tested it with the acciaccatura function. Thanks, Patrick From d483a4150aebc3f9bb268001f5e549aa26a4911f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:09:12 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Docs: Add docstring support to def-grace-function Signed-off-by: Pa

Patch to fix `make web'

2009-01-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, This patch fixes `make web'. Can someone apply it? Thanks, Patrick >From c64f776177d23dabd9ffe28ed2aac7dcf0240fc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:10:58 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix compile Signed-off-by: Patrick McCarty --- Documentati

Re: Patch to fix `make web'

2009-01-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:15:02PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Hello, > > This patch fixes `make web'. Can someone apply it? ...but it didn't fix `make all'. Sorry about the early post. This revised patch should fix the issue

Re: Contributor Guide "volunteers" needed

2009-01-18 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 09:25:13PM +0800, Graham Percival wrote: > It's just past 9pm local time on Sunday. I went to university, > took some pictures, got sucked into work and being polite to my > supervisor, had dinner and bought breakfast for the next few days, > and had a shower. Let's face i

Re: Contributor Guide "volunteers" needed

2009-01-18 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:02:35PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2009/1/18 Patrick McCarty : > > The most important thing about git commands that we should be > > *absolutely* consistent about is this: > > > > (1) git-format-patch origin > > > > ...versus

make distclean

2009-01-23 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, I occasionally do `make clean' followed by `make distclean' in the top source dir, and I've noticed that `make distclean' recreates the out/ directories that `make clean' removes. I'm not bothered by it, but is `make distclean' supposed to create the out/ directories? Thanks, Patrick __

Re: instrument-specific-markup interface

2009-01-24 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > Both markup fret diagrams and harp pedal markups share the > instrument-specific-markup interface. The instrument-specific-markup > interface contains fret-diagram-details, harp-pedal-details, size, and > thickness. > > Do we need to comb

Invalid overrides in ly/gregorian.ly?

2009-01-31 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, After looking through source, I can't find a spot where 'extra-X-extent and 'extra-Y-extent are recognized, yet they are documented in the grob interface and an 'extra-X-extent override is used six times in ly/gregorian.ly. If they are no longer functional, should a convert-ly rule be adde

Re: Invalid overrides in ly/gregorian.ly?

2009-02-01 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > It looks like extra-X-extent and extra-Y-extent were removed from the > calculation of a grob extent in lily/grob.cc by committish > c9b87b059ea73d9adb2b416e30c78e9340af8af2. This is dated 21 Oct 2005, so > these properties have been ineffe

Re: CSS style for

2009-02-06 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Paul, On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:14:27PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > I haven't complimented our fantastic documentation lately. It is truely > amazing!! Thanks! > Is it true for anyone else that the effective font for all the HTML > enclosed in tags is somewhat smaller which in not a pro

Building GUB3

2009-02-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, I've been trying to build GUB3 on my x86 box, but Guile fails in the configure stage. Attached is the relevant part of config.log. Thanks, Patrick configure:22123: checking size of char configure:22425: gcc -o conftest -I/home/pnorcks/git/gub/target/tools/root/usr/include -L/home/pnorcks

Patch to fix compile

2009-02-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, `make all' is currently broken on git master. This patch fixes the problem. Thanks, Patrick >From b298a2adda7282020b293834b318cd2f5fb4bee6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:24:32 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix compile * @example environme

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-08 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op zondag 08-02-2009 om 01:06 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Reinhold > Kainhofer: > > > > Attached is the relevant part of config.log. > > *interesting* > > > That's the same problem I encountered a while ago (see the discussio

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-09 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:54:33AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op zondag 08-02-2009 om 11:22 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Patrick > McCarty: > > > No, I have > > /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7 > > Ah, good. Lots has been going on and I could reproduce this problem. &

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-11 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:33:00PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > So, gcc -m32 is trying to link to a 64 bit library. That does not work. > > I see that ABI=32, so I assume that you run a 32 bit OS on 64 bit > hardware? Hmm. I'm running a 32-bit OS and have 32-bit hardware. But gmp compil

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-11 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:49:31PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On wo, 2009-02-11 at 11:22 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > Hmm. I'm running a 32-bit OS and have 32-bit hardware. But gmp > > compiled successfully after your fix though. > > Interesting. W

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:06:28PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > I finally cooked-up a patch for that, it took a bit more work than > I imagined. With latest GUB3 you can do > >LIBRESTRICT=open:stat bin/gub mingw::guile # or mingw::lilypond > > This will disallow libtool to r

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:06:28PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >> >> I finally cooked-up a patch for that, it took a bit more work than >> I imagined. With latest GUB3 you can do >> &g

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:40:53AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On za, 2009-02-14 at 13:42 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > > I decided to start completely from scratch with `make lilypond' to see > > if I could reproduce the current libto

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 01:13:35PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On zo, 2009-02-15 at 03:00 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > In the download stage, everything downloads fine except for guile; > > guile is immediately skipped over after the `*** Stage: download

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:06:28PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On wo, 2009-02-11 at 20:48 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > Okay, now it halts at mingw::guile. Everything is fine up until then. > > Here is the tail end of build.log. > > so the question is: why is

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-16 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:19:32AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > iOn zo, 2009-02-15 at 19:13 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > Those files exist, and libintl.la looks correct. It is not executable > > (755) like all of the other .la files I see, but this does no

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:19:32AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > iOn zo, 2009-02-15 at 19:13 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > Those files exist, and libintl.la looks correct. It is not executable > > (755) like all of the other .la files I see, but this does no

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:45:20PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Okay. Below is my sys_lib_search_path_spec, notice the > target/mingw/root/usr/lib bit. What does yours > (target/mingw/root/usr/lib/libtool) look like? Here it is (from target/mingw/root/usr/bin/libtool): # Com

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:51:55PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On di, 2009-02-17 at 01:58 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > With that workaround, I can now build LilyPond for all target > > platforms except for darwin-x86. GUB fails at darwin-x86::gmp. Se

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > The log for x86 is identical to the previous one. However, this looks > a bit suspicious: > >configure:2022: checking for none-apple-darwin8-strip >configure:2051: result: no >configure:206

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-18 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:00:50AM +, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Ah, well that's totally bogus. It should be filled by this command > in libtools' configure > > mingw* | cegcc*) > # MinGW DLLs use traditional 'lib' prefix > soname_spec='${libname}`echo ${release} |

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-19 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:46:34AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On di, 2009-02-17 at 13:55 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > With the latest HEAD, gmp fails at configure for both darwin-x86 and > > darwin-ppc. The ppc build was successful for me before your l

Re: Building GUB3

2009-02-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:05:24PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On do, 2009-02-19 at 13:41 -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > Bumping gmp to 4.2.4 for darwin-x86, and removing the patch and > > configure_command (), fixed the darwin-x86 build for me. > > Ok, gre

Re: \cresc applies to the next note!

2009-02-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote: > > Because \dim starts on the next note, you have to put it before \ff > which is the contrary of what happens really! If you put \dim after > \ff, the "dim" starts on the next note and it is possible that the > "ff" and the "dim" are not put

Another GUB3 problem

2009-03-02 Thread Patrick McCarty
PATH=/home/pnorcks/git/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin:/home/pnorcks/git/gub/target/linux-x86/root/usr/bin:$PATH GS_LIB=/home/pnorcks/git/gub/target/linux-x86/root/usr/share/ghostscript/*/lib MALLOC_CHECK_=2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/pnorcks/git/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib:/home/pnorcks/git/gub/target

Re: Enabling item-interface

2009-03-02 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Carl, I'm not really sure what to suggest, but I can point out a couple of things. On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:05:29PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > I've added the item-interface to the fretboard grob: > >(FretBoard > . ((stencil . ,fret-board::calc-stencil) > (fret-diag

Re: install-2.13.html ?

2009-03-21 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > I just realized that I probably should have modified the download > page, but I can't see any install-2.11.html or the like.  What do > we normally do for development versions? Here are a couple of commits you could look at to see what hap

GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-03-24 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, I'm now building GUB3 with 64-bit Arch Linux, so I can no longer test the 32-bit OS / 64-bit hardware quirks, but it seems like most of those were ironed out. The patch I posted here [1] still works for me on my new setup, i.e. darwin-x86::gmp builds fine, if you want to apply it. [1] ht

Re: odd configure error

2009-03-26 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:08:40PM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote: >> >> GIT from git.sv.gnu.org >>     git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git > > This does not set up easy pulling or pushing in the future, and > generally assumes that p

Patches for the web site

2009-03-26 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, The first patch fixes a newly added link on the download page, and the second adds LilyPond 2.13 to the list on the documentation page. Thanks, Patrick >From c7f3bec4129e4cc132dd6a534028d94c10b2a68e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:44:55 -0

Re: odd configure error

2009-03-27 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am Freitag, 27. März 2009 schrieb Graham Percival: >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:31:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> > Let's say remote master has

Re: anybody feel like patching away -Wno-long-double?

2009-03-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
in-x86' first though. -Patrick >From 3e85875710380e7822bf85217156d7593616bca3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:14:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix odcctools compile * In `configure' for odcctools, the -Wno-long-double option should not be us

[PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list

2009-04-02 Thread Patrick McCarty
rick >From 27dca7f299aac2f0894c05dc7adcb1647b685d1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:01:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list Signed-off-by: Patrick McCarty --- scm/define-grob-properties.scm | 15 +++---

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list

2009-04-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 4/2/09 5:31 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This patch moves the 'details property from the internal to the user >> grob property list. > > I believe that movin

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list

2009-04-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:53:43PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > > > On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen > > wrote: > >> > >>> > >> Unfortunately, ther

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list

2009-04-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2009/4/3 Carl D. Sorensen : > > > > > > > > On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen > >> wrote: > >&g

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list

2009-04-06 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:37:09AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> >> So, is the patch okay as it is? >> > Don't refer to *.cc files for more information on the subproperties in > details. These are (or at least should

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list

2009-04-06 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:46:41AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 4/6/09 7:10 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote: > > > > What do you mean? The way it's done for the Stem related > > subproperties is that the documentation is included together with > > the other stem-interface documentation at the

Re: inter-quant-penalty in beaming

2009-04-06 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > I've been working on fixing the documentation of details for beaming. > > One of the parameters in details is inter-quant-penalty. > > However, this property is only read in lily/beam-quanting.cc; it is never > used. > > Further, a git grep

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list

2009-04-06 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:48:15PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > Patrick, > > I applied this patch. I actually had to redo it, because I changed > define-grobs.scm first, so the patch wouldn't apply. But it's > applied now, along with the changes to lily/beam.cc and > scm/define-grob-interfac

Re: tab characters in the source code

2009-04-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > > I was fiddling around with output-ps.scm (specifically > the grob-cause procedure on line 159) and was getting > frustrated with the poor indentation displaying in my > editor when I realized that this was being caused by > tab characters in

Re: Implement framework for post-fix text (de)cresc spanners

2009-04-11 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:28:06AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > On Samstag, 11. April 2009 20:33:47 n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: > > > You'd > > need a method which does the reverse of camel_case_to_lisp_identifier () > > so that the events would be converted from e.g. crescendo-spanner ->

Re: GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-04-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:25:37PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > Right now, at the lilypond-installer stage, GUB fails and attached is > the installer.log. > > > > * Starting build: Tue Mar 24 14:01:08 2009 > *** Stage: build (installer, linux-x86) > invoking

GUB3: M4 not accurately recognized?

2009-04-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, I am trying to build a mingw LilyPond installer, but I am running into a problem at the tools::bison configure stage. It seems that the GUB-installed M4 is not being recognized as GNU M4 >= 1.4. The end of the config.log: configure:6456: checking for gm4 configure:6489: result: no

Re: GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-04-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:43:07PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op donderdag 16-04-2009 om 13:10 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan > Nieuwenhuizen: > > >* it should -C change directory to target/installer/..., > > I see no reason for . to exist, be writable, much less > >

Re: GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-04-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op vrijdag 17-04-2009 om 00:29 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick > McCarty: > > Hi Patrick, > > > I just tried doing a fresh build with > > > > $ bin/gub tools::bison && bin/gub to

[PATCH] Fix compile

2009-04-19 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hello, This patch fixes `make install' on git master. Thanks, Patrick >From c4da6295243ff08fdff1255d4d9985b64a23bff8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:12:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix compile --- python/convertrules.py |2 +- 1 files ch

Re: GUB3: M4 not accurately recognized?

2009-04-21 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op woensdag 15-04-2009 om 00:51 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick > McCarty: > > > I am trying to build a mingw LilyPond installer, but I am running into > > a problem at the tools::

Re: GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-04-21 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:43:07PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > >* it should -C change directory to target/installer/..., > > I see no reason for . to exist, be writable, much less > > to be open()ed > >* "my" tools/root/usr/bin/tar does not seem to do this, > >

Re: GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-04-22 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:48:38PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op dinsdag 21-04-2009 om 21:38 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick > McCarty: > > > I ran the command that is failing through strace, and the output is > > attached. > > > > Line 65

Re: recent beaming change?

2009-04-25 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote: > My latest LilyPond build (2.13.1, 24 Apr 2009) produces different > beaming than my last build. > > e.g. {c''8 c'' c'' c''} > used to produce   |_|_|_| > and now it gives me    |_|  |_| > > Was this intentional? Yes, this was changed recen

Re: recent beaming change?

2009-04-25 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote: >> My latest LilyPond build (2.13.1, 24 Apr 2009) produces different >> beaming than my last build. >> >> e.g. {c''8 c'' c''

Re: GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-04-26 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:18:25AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op woensdag 22-04-2009 om 21:07 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick > McCarty: > > > Your latest fixes on master work for me. > > > > I can now build all of the installers except for dar

Re: crash while processing lily-7d242e8d.ly

2009-05-01 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:24:17AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 4/30/09 3:04 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote: > > > 2009/4/30 Werner LEMBERG : > > > >> Interestingly, > >> > >>  lilypond -dbackend=eps lily-7d242e8d.ly > >> > >> works just fine. > > > > Looks like you were trying to run the

[PATCH] SVG backend improvement

2009-05-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
or colored grobs and text I plan to address these issues, too (eventually). If there is a simpler way to accomplish what this patch implements, I would be happy to revise it. Thanks, Patrick >From 730c0d995d25216ae5bdafb6c46a7a1da29cadd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date:

Re: Page breaking and squeezing as many systems on a page as possible?

2009-05-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Hi all, > I already sent this to lilypond-user last week, but didn't get any hint for a > solution, so maybe the devel list is more helpful: > > > I'm currently trying to squeeze the choir part of a mass onto 8 pages. > Here is the lilypo

Re: [PATCH] SVG backend improvement

2009-05-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:44:04PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > This patch (mostly) addresses the third point for this issue: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=755 > > With this patch, the only grouping tags left in the SVG output are for > >

Re: Lily on OSX Leopard, problems running own build

2009-05-08 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > > Frankly, my preferred solution is just to document that you can > still use the command-line version perfectly well, and newbies > should use jEdit, and then maoing **delete** the GUI from the OSX > version.  I'm not convinced we should bo

Re: [PATCH] SVG backend improvement

2009-05-10 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 10:11:50PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2009/5/7 Patrick McCarty : > > > Does anyone have any comments about this patch? > > The SVG source is much easier to read. :) I definitely agree! > You're compiling the regexp each time the function'

Re: Recompiling the parser

2009-05-12 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:13:35PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > I've tried adding to the parser, but it seems that my changes are > not being > compiled. > > Is there a dependency that will cause the parser to be recompiled, > or do I have to do make clean? > > I've tried touching parser.yy,

Re: Grace notes: stem length depending on the size

2009-05-14 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: > Hello, > > a code involving acciaccaturas had a problem I couldn't reproduce at > standard size; I have discovered that the difference is shown between > 17 and 18 for global-staff-size. At 17 the stems are very long, at 18 > they are norma

Re: DOCS: include a sample "Makefile"?

2009-05-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:42:41PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Anthony W. Youngman wrote: >> In message <4a0d4529.9080...@gmail.com>, John Mandereau >> writes >>> pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au a écrit : If you use GNU extensions, then here's the Makefile I generally use, to convert everyt

Re: [DOC PATCH]: add .ily extension to filetype.vim and editor support

2009-05-15 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:39:26PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Here's a patch to add the .ily extension to the filetype.vim file in the > sources and to the Application Usage 2.2.2 "Vim mode" sample filetype.vim. You should also add the *.ily to vim/lilypond-ftdetect.vim, because vim/filetype.vi

Re: [DOC PATCH]: add .ily extension to filetype.vim and editor support

2009-05-16 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 12:03:34AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:39:26PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: >>> Here's a patch to add the .ily extension to the filetype.vim file in the >>> sources and to the Applicati

Re: [DOC PATCH]: add .ily extension to filetype.vim and editor support

2009-05-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 05:04:18PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > That's correct. At one point, I had filetype.vim in my ~/.vim > > directory too, but since ftdetect/lilypond.vim does (basically) the > &g

Re: [DOC PATCH]: add .ily extension to filetype.vim and editor support

2009-05-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:35:29PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Patrick, > > I reset my git repo, re-did the changes, and made a new patch. A > bunch of the changes are stripped whitespaces. I think I got all > the vim *.ily stuff in there this time, though. New patch attached. Great, it appl

Re: [DOC PATCH]: add .ily extension to filetype.vim and editor support

2009-05-18 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 09:06:58AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:35:29PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: >>> Patrick, >>> >>> I reset my git repo, re-did the changes, and made a new patch. A >>> bunc

Re: centering of instrument names

2009-05-19 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: > Hello, > > I think instrument names were recently implemented in a centered > column by default. I would like to help improving this because the > exact location of every name is at first well computed but finally > wrongly typeset, as the

Re: git not fetching from origin...

2009-05-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:02:41AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > > > On 5/19/09 11:58 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote: > > > > > > > Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > 3. git pull origin master > >>> From git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond > >>> * branchmaster-> FETCH_HEAD > >>> Alrea

Re: [frogs] patch for issue 708

2009-05-23 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: >> Can you change the status of 708 to fixed in 2.13.1?  And verify, at your >> convenience? > > Actually, the idea is that the programmer (or comitter) would > change the st

Re: git not fetching from origin...

2009-05-24 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:40:08PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > I guess I'm confused about the difference between origin and > master. And the difference between pulling and fetching (and > cloning, though that's not mentioned in the CG). "git clone" is a command that you use to *copy* the re

Re: git not fetching from origin...

2009-05-24 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:07:06PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 5/24/09 10:57 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote: > > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:40:08PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > > > The "already up to date" means that all of your remote

Re: git not fetching from origin...

2009-05-24 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:33:51PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 5/24/09 8:40 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote: > > > > > I think the instructions in the CG just aren't clear enough. Is > > anyone out there happily making git patches on Windows? Le

Re: suspicious break-align values

2009-05-27 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 02:17:55AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > line 408 of define-grobs.scm lists "staff" in a break-align-orders > vector. Is that a typo? Yes, I'm pretty sure. > line 49 of lsr/creating-simultaneous-rehearsal-marks.ly reads: > \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-alig

[PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing

2009-05-27 Thread Patrick McCarty
759f635055bf1acea0a0a20ae2e06d58b71e8940 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:40:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing * If -dpreview is used when output-preview-framework does not exist for the given backend, LilyPond

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing

2009-05-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Hello, > > This patch fixes a crash that occurs when the specified backend does > not have an output-preview-framework (used for -dpreview). > > I also added a similar check for output-framework just in case a user &g

[PATCH] Fix compile for GCC 4.4

2009-05-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
7c2b69dcd33ee3116e97e90d1616531bee77d07c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McCarty Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:50:29 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix compile for GCC 4.4 Signed-off-by: Patrick McCarty --- lily/relocate.cc |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a

Re: [PATCH] Fix compile for GCC 4.4

2009-05-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:00:14AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Hello, > > I need the attached patch to compile LilyPond. On second thought, please ignore this patch for now. Even though I currently need it, I doubt very many distributions are updating GCC until 4.4.1 comes out, b

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing

2009-05-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
uch this message is much harder to understand. If you > prefer the backend at the end, I would formulate it as: > > Program option -dpreview not supported by backend `%s'. I like Reinhold's suggestion a little more, so I think we should go with it. A new patch with revised warning

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing

2009-05-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2009 22:18:23 schrieb Neil Puttock: >> > +   war

Re: [PATCH] Fix compile for GCC 4.4

2009-05-28 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:00:14AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I need the attached patch to compile LilyPond. > > On second thought, please ignore this patch for now.  Even though I > curren

Re: where does symbol-append come from?

2009-05-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:30:57AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Why does this work? "symbol-append" is not listed in the guile > manual, nor do I see it in the lilypond source. It was an accident > that I discovered this at all, and subsequently I saw that it's > implemented in MIT/GNU Scheme, b

Re: lily-library.scm question

2009-05-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:17:58PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > In lily-library.scm, why are some procedures defined with > "define-public" and some others only with "define"? To the best of my understanding... The "define" procedures are generally only available within a single module (the Sc

Re: lily-library.scm question

2009-05-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> The "define" procedures are generally only available within a >> single module  "define-public" creates a sort of *global >> procedure*; any module has access to it.

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys : >> Hi guys, >> >> I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due >> to the savannah problems, the website did not show it).  It was made >> with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostsc

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila >> wrote: >>> 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys : >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> I pushed a new lily release (ac

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> I don't know if there is any performance penalty, but it's probably >> negligible.  You could propose that these procedures be made public; I >> am okay with it. > > Then if no

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Am D

Re: Website broken

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Hi there, > > can someone fix this?  This currently hangs the website update. > > mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/ > msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po > po/de.po:166: end-of-line within string > po/de.po:167: en

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >