On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > Frankly, my preferred solution is just to document that you can > still use the command-line version perfectly well, and newbies > should use jEdit, and then maoing **delete** the GUI from the OSX > version. I'm not convinced we should bother keeping the GUI in > the Windows version, either. And if the Linux version has a GUI, > we should kill that. Nobody should be using the default lilypond > editor. The specialized ones (jedit) are incredibly better, > especially for newbies. And advanced users probably have their > own favorite editor (vim if they're smart, emacs otherwise ;), so > there's no benefit to keeping lame, broken GUIs.
While the builtin GUIs are not in very great shape, what would take their place? I mean, most users expect that when a new icon appears on their desktop, and they double-click it, *something* should happen. ;-) -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
