On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Carl D. Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > Both markup fret diagrams and harp pedal markups share the > instrument-specific-markup interface. The instrument-specific-markup > interface contains fret-diagram-details, harp-pedal-details, size, and > thickness. > > Do we need to combine the two interfaces into one > instrument-specific-markup-interface? This seems strained to me. I would > prefer to have a > > fret-diagram-markup-interface > with > fret-diagram-details, size, thickness > > and a > > harp-pedal-interface > with > harp-pedal-details, size, thickness > > so that the two aren't combined. I think that will be more clear. > > Is there any reason not to do that?
I'm okay with it. If more specialized markup environments are added to LilyPond in the future, I could see the instrument-specific-markup interface page getting very lengthy, so I think it would be best to split it up. -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
