On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com>: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due >>>> to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made >>>> with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostscript 8.65). Please >>>> have a ride and tell me if there are problems. It did run >>>> successfully under WINE. >>> It does not include fixes to 739 and 759 from Friday. >>> >>> On Linux i386, ps file is generated but not converted to pdf. >>> >>> Log says >>> >>> Converting to `./test.pdf'... >>> `gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89 >>> -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite >>> -sOutputFile="./test.pdf" -c .setpdfwrite -f "test.ps"' failed (256) >> >> I can reproduce this here (with GNU/Linux 32-bit). Attached is the >> output I get with `lilypond -V'. >> >> -Patrick >> > > Is this problem related to the binary posted at lilypond.org? I have no > problems with the 2.13.1 I build from source.
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there is no file gs_init.ps located in the installation directory. My system Ghostscript has this file: /usr/share/ghostscript/8.64/Resource/Init/gs_init.ps > If it would help, I can test on Xubuntu 9.04, OSX 10.4, Windows XP and > Windows 7. Certainly! I'm sure not many people are testing on Windows 7 yet, so this information would be helpful. -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
