On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2009 22:18:23 schrieb Neil Puttock:
>>> > + warning (_f ("the `%s' backend does not support -dprint-pages",
>>> > + get_output_backend_name ()));
>>> >
>>> > + warning (_f ("the `%s' backend does not support -dpreview",
>>> > + get_output_backend_name ()));
>>> >
>>> > I'm not sure about these; personally I'd prefer having the important
>>> > information (the unsupported backend) at the end of the message:
>>> >
>>> > "unsupported backend for program option -dpreview: `%s'"
>>>
>>> This way, the explanation "unsupported backend" and the type of backend are
>>> very far apart and as such this message is much harder to understand. If you
>>> prefer the backend at the end, I would formulate it as:
>>>
>>> Program option -dpreview not supported by backend `%s'.
>>
>> I like Reinhold's suggestion a little more, so I think we should go
>> with it.
>>
>> A new patch with revised warning messages is attached.
>
> Sorry, something weird happened with the encoding of my last message.
> I'll send it through the web interface this time.
Any comments for this revised patch? The only things I changed were
the warning messages.
Thanks,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
