Due to security concerns the ` ... ` extension to embed
LilyPond (and ABC) scores in Wikipedia pages that are displayed
automatically were disabled for more than a year.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T257066
This has been reactivated now. It seems, however, that not all
details have
> Here’s a minimal example to get the same effect.
>
> \version "2.19.0"
>
> {
> \override Staff.TimeSignature.font-name = "New Century Schoolbook"
> a1
> }
Thanks. This is now issue #3809.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-deve
> Excellent. This also solves the blue-notes issue in Firefox for me,
> even after clipping in Inkscape. So, to summarize for reference:
> [...] Correct?
It seems so. Thanks a lot for your assistance!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lily
inating the need for
an additional tool.
Correct?
HTH,
Alexander
[1] Compare
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/thumb/archive/4/4d/20140113150856%21Klavierst%C3%BCcke_%28Stockhausen%29_Nr2-Klavierst%C3%BCck2-Anfang.svg/500px-Klavierst%C3%BCcke_%28Stockhausen%29_Nr2-Klavierst%C3%BCck2-
> This seems to be fine, but no clue why:
>
> inkscape --verb=EditSelectAllInAllLayers --verb=ObjectToPath
> --verb=FileSave --verb=FileClose file.svg
> ./svgclip.py -o cropped.svg file.svg
>
> where svgclip.py is here: https://github.com/skagedal/svgclip
I've followed that and uploaded a new vers
On 01/13/2014 02:17 PM, Joram Berger wrote:
On the other hand, the uncropped SVG image
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/archive/4/4d/20140113112433%21Klavierst%C3%BCcke_%28Stockhausen%29_Nr2-Klavierst%C3%BCck2-Anfang.svg
gets displayed fine, while the cropped SVG image
http
On 01/13/2014 02:30 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Which browser?
Firefox 26, Chromium and Konqueror 4.8.5 - also after reload.
Very strange.
Fine here with Chromium (Debian wheezy, v31.something) and Iceweasel 23,
but the cropped image I made (see below) exhibits the "blue
only"-behaviour.
works for me now.
Joram
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>> Which browser?
>
> Firefox 26, Chromium and Konqueror 4.8.5 - also after reload.
Very strange.
> The article image links to the uncropped image and shows the
> corresponding ~A4 aspect ratio.
??? Looking at the source code of the `LilyPond' article, I see
Screenshot = [[Datei:Klavierstüc
Am 13.01.2014 14:04, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>
>> For me it now looks heavily distorted (wrong aspect ratio)
>
> Which browser?
Firefox 26, Chromium and Konqueror 4.8.5 - also after reload.
> On the other hand, the uncropped SVG image
>
>
> http://upload
(does anybody know why? and can I change that?),
and for some reasons Wikipedia hasn't (yet?) regenerated the previews
from the most recent SVG version.[*]
On the other hand, the uncropped SVG image
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/archive/4/4d/20140113112433%21Klavierst%C3%BCcke_%28
For me it now looks heavily distorted (wrong aspect ratio)
Joram
Am 13.01.2014 12:26, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>
>> Attached are a source version, without the font change for the time
>> sig which crashes SVG creation, and the SVG output.
>
> Thanks! Looks great. I
> Attached are a source version, without the font change for the time
> sig which crashes SVG creation, and the SVG output.
Thanks! Looks great. I've updated the Wikipedia page.
Werner
PS: Note that this example exhibits a bug in ImageMagick's `display'
program
seems to be more of an issue when we're talking
about lilypond.org.
Are we positive that we can post this example as "fair use" (like
indicated on the wikipedia page?
Ah rats, forgot about that. Not entirely sure. But if the copyright
expiration is a hard deal, then we are not
e more of an issue when we're talking
> about lilypond.org.
>
> Are we positive that we can post this example as "fair use" (like
> indicated on the wikipedia page?
Ah rats, forgot about that. Not entirely sure. But if the copyright
expiration is a hard deal, then we are no
lypond.org.
Are we positive that we can post this example as "fair use" (like
indicated on the wikipedia page?
Urs
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Am 13.01.2014 11:14, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Urs Liska" ; "Joram Berger"
;
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
&
Phil Holmes writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Not aiming to disappoint you further, I always wondered why there are so
many completely different WikiPedia pages for LilyPond. Most have their
som
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Urs Liska" ; "Joram Berger" ;
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Having s
Hi,
2014/1/13 Phil Holmes :
> Here's my final version.
Looks very nice, good job!
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Of course that Stockhausen example on Wik
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Shouldn't we rather put this up on our own example page, to complement
the set there? I think that it would make an excellent addition.
As an _only_ exa
Joram Berger schrieb:
>Hi,
>
>this is another thing, but how about adding a nice standard notation
>example to the wikipedia entry?
>(like http://lilypond.org/ly-examples/bach-bwv610.png)
>
>This Stockhausen is very impressive if you want to know that you can
>tweak
Hi,
this is another thing, but how about adding a nice standard notation
example to the wikipedia entry?
(like http://lilypond.org/ly-examples/bach-bwv610.png)
This Stockhausen is very impressive if you want to know that you can
tweak most everything to your needs. And it is now really close to
On Jan 13, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> My Windows machine won't convert this to SVG. Would someone else
>>> like to and to upload the SVG?
>>
>> Hmm. I tried
>>
>> lilypond -dbackend=svg stockhausen.ly
>>
>> and get the error
>>
>> warning: cannot find SVG font #f
>
> B
>> My Windows machine won't convert this to SVG. Would someone else
>> like to and to upload the SVG?
>
> Hmm. I tried
>
> lilypond -dbackend=svg stockhausen.ly
>
> and get the error
>
> warning: cannot find SVG font #f
BTW, what about creating and installing SVG and WOFF fonts too for the
`
> Here's my final version.
Looks great, thanks!
> My Windows machine won't convert this to SVG. Would someone else
> like to and to upload the SVG?
Hmm. I tried
lilypond -dbackend=svg stockhausen.ly
and get the error
warning: cannot find SVG font #f
/usr/local/share/lilypond/2.19.0/sc
On 12.01.2014, at 19:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: "Carl Sorensen" ; "James" ;
> "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 6:24 PM
> Subject: Re: fixing Ger
2014/1/12 pls :
>
> On 12.01.2014, at 19:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
>> - Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
>>> Latest version is attached. Needs dotted tuplet brackets, a bit of tidying
>>> of positioning, alternative time signature format, move of clef in LH of 2nd
>>> bar and I thin
On 12.01.2014, at 19:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: "Carl Sorensen" ; "James" ;
> "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 6:24 PM
> Subject: Re: fixing Ger
On 1/12/14 8:04 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Phil Holmes"
>To: "James" ; "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
>
>Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:32 PM
>Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia en
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "James" ; "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
- Original Message -
From: James
To: Werner LEMBE
- Original Message -
From: James
To: Werner LEMBERG ; Devel
The pedal symbol clashes with the dynamic in bar 3 and there is a clash
of a tuplets in the second upper bar with accidentals - which I believe is
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3766
Anyway, I have done
Folks,
the German Wikipedia entry of LilyPond at
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/LilyPond
shows a few bars of a Stockhausen piano piece. Unfortunately, it's of
bad quality: it contains input errors (cf. the plain text `pp'), the
typesetting of the score itself, and its convers
On 04/07/13 16:59, Phil Holmes wrote:
I note that someone has updated Wikipedia to change the title of the
LilyPond page from GNU LilyPond to LilyPond, stating (somewhat
accurately) that GNU isn't actually part of the name. I don't
understand the principles around the use of GNU
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> I note that someone has updated Wikipedia to change the title of the
> LilyPond page from GNU LilyPond to LilyPond, stating (somewhat
> accurately) that GNU isn't actually part of the name. I don't
> understand the principles around the
I note that someone has updated Wikipedia to change the title of the
LilyPond page from GNU LilyPond to LilyPond, stating (somewhat accurately)
that GNU isn't actually part of the name. I don't understand the principles
around the use of GNU as part of the title, but wondered whet
W dniu 8 lutego 2012 19:48 użytkownik Xavier Scheuer
napisał:
> On 8 February 2012 17:03, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> Wikipedia uses LaTeX to render math formulas.
>
> Hi Janek,
>
> This was already discussed (a long time ago) on LilyPond mailing lists
> IIRC. Should
On 8 February 2012 17:03, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Wikipedia uses LaTeX to render math formulas.
Hi Janek,
This was already discussed (a long time ago) on LilyPond mailing lists
IIRC. Should be findable through the archives.
> Why couldn't it use LilyPond to create music examples
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2012/2/8 David Kastrup :
>> A publication like Wikipedia would likely have considerable leanings
>> towards a MusicXML-based solution.
>
> I don't imagine anyone typing MusicXML
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicXML#Example
Nor do I with Ma
2012/2/8 David Kastrup :
> A publication like Wikipedia would likely have considerable leanings
> towards a MusicXML-based solution.
I don't imagine anyone typing MusicXML
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicXML#Example
> Easily convertable
> tweak-less subsets of LilyPond (the s
Janek Warchoł writes:
> Wikipedia uses LaTeX to render math formulas. Why couldn't it use
> LilyPond to create music examples in articles?
>
> Why LilyPond is perfect for Wikipedia:
> - text input, can be created using a web browser
> - easy to create both vector graphi
Wikipedia uses LaTeX to render math formulas. Why couldn't it use
LilyPond to create music examples in articles?
Why LilyPond is perfect for Wikipedia:
- text input, can be created using a web browser
- easy to create both vector graphics and raster images at any given resolution
- GNU G
2009/12/30 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> Op zaterdag 05-09-2009 om 18:53 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
> Vila:
>
> Hi Francisco,
>
>> I've been updating a bit the Spanish Wikipedia page for LilyPond.
>
>> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
>
>
Op zaterdag 05-09-2009 om 18:53 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
Hi Francisco,
> I've been updating a bit the Spanish Wikipedia page for LilyPond.
> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
Great, thanks! This has become quite an article. Did you
consider thoug
I've been updating a bit the Spanish Wikipedia page for LilyPond.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
Some sections need more work and there are untouched blocks. Feel free
to reuse that material for other languages, I could help on the Es->En
translating if needed.
--
Franci
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
Just some thoughts...
I'll take this all into account, just give me some time.
With your permission, I'll write it into Spanish page first, then will
take it a
2009/6/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
> Nieuwenhuizen:
> Just some thoughts...
I'll take this all into account, just give me some time.
With your permission, I'll write it into Spanish page first, then will
take it as reference for the En
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
> Did the original spanish page look at good examples of
> other softwares? I don't read spanish, but it looks
> real different from, say
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibelius_(software)
For example, the Sibeliu
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 11:31 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
> 2009/6/4 Francisco Vila :
> > I have freshened the Spanish wikipedia LilyPond page a little bit.
> > This is the most time-consuming task you can face. After a rest I
> > could try transl
2009/6/4 Francisco Vila :
> I have freshened the Spanish wikipedia LilyPond page a little bit.
> This is the most time-consuming task you can face. After a rest I
> could try translating it into English, sooner or later.
I can help you with the translation, but I don't have a Wikipe
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
> First thing we can do, given that the talk section is intended to
> improve the article, is to write down these objections in it.
Well, that's what Han-Wen did in 2006. Nothing happened. I'd say:
be bold and fix it
2009/6/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> Hi there,
>
> Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond
...
> Possibly it's no wonder that wikipedia doesn't use lilypond,
> considering that our article on wikipedia is
's what Han-Wen did in 2006. Nothing happened. I'd say:
> be bold and fix it first.
I have freshened the Spanish wikipedia LilyPond page a little bit.
This is the most time-consuming task you can face. After a rest I
could try translating it into English, sooner or later.
--
Francis
Hi there,
Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond
page and found it still has the weird (long and not very
impressive) fire breathers example. Why the .ly at all,
better show impressive output and move .ly example
to a
usic as an amateur and using occasionally typesetting I discovered
> Lilypond some years ago. And I used it with increasing enthusiasm. I'm writing
> music/math/computer science occasionally in Wikipedia too.
>
> Math is no problem because with TeX there is a tool which exceeds
&
Playing music as an amateur and using occasionally typesetting I discovered
Lilypond some years ago. And I used it with increasing enthusiasm. I'm writing
music/math/computer science occasionally in Wikipedia too.
Math is no problem because with TeX there is a tool which exceeds expectations
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > I think their concern that Scheme is needed to do anything useful is
> > unfounded, and that Scheme just should be disabled for the purpose of
> > the MediaWiki extension.
>
> I thing this was n
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:52:59 am Graham Percival wrote:
> You're alive, so you can learn. When you
> stop learning, you're dead.
Paul Erdös said of mathematicians that if they had died,
they had left. If they were not doing mathematics anymore,
they were dead.
Ian
--
___
Graham (et al.),
Programmers are made, not born.
True.
We're not genetically superior to non-programmers.
Speak for yourself! ;-)
When you stop learning, you're dead.
More to the point: when you're dead, you stop learning.
Just my (muck-raking) 2¢.
Kieren.
__
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:22:54PM -0300, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Graham Percival :
> > As I always say, lilypond can do it if there's enough interest.
> > If there's real, honest, interest in lilypond-in-a-wiki, then
> > somebody will step forwards to work on the issues.
>
2009/4/21 Francisco Vila :
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
>> How is it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikipedi
gt; > > will always end in a reasonable amount of time.
> > > - one person modifies --safe. I'm sure that we can whitelist a
> > > few more commands (IIRC changing the paper size is not "safe").
> > > But we'll certainly need to remove much of the
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>
> > I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is
> > it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikiped
few more commands (IIRC changing the paper size is not "safe").
> > But we'll certainly need to remove much of the more basic stuff.
we should probably mention on the wikipedia page that these concerns
are being worked on. Why doesn't WikiPedia come to us with q
Wikipedia won't allow lilypond due to security and performance reasons
as far as I know.
I and other have already created quite useful mediawiki plugins.
Bert
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there is any progress
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
> Hi everybody!
>
> I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
> How is it going? (is it going?)
Are you talking about
- the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
- the LilyPond plugin for mediawiki
There was an interesting pro
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
How is it going? (is it going?)
Thanks!
Helder
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >
> > Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
> >
> > My understanding is that
> >
> > a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
>
> My understanding is that
>
> a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
> infinite loop scripts
As it currently stands, yes.
>
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
> can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
> [...]
Thanks you for bringing it to the proper place. I've been meaning to, but
got too swamped in wor
There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
A resumé of the discussion is this last comment (from about a week
ago):
We want LilyPond to be as safe to call as, say, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > > > > Is there interest in this for www.lilypond.org?
> > > >
> > > > No. It's not our own server, and we're sucking up too much
> > > > bandwidth as it is.
> > >
> > > I didn't know that... Pity.
> >
> > In case
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > > Is there interest in this for www.lilypond.org?
> > >
> > > No. It's not our own server, and we're sucking up too much
> > > bandwidth as it is.
> >
> > I didn't know that... Pity.
>
> In case you have the bandwidth you could set something up
> > > Is there interest in this for www.lilypond.org?
> >
> > No. It's not our own server, and we're sucking up too much
> > bandwidth as it is.
>
> I didn't know that... Pity.
In case you have the bandwidth you could set something up, and
lilypond.org then would provide a prominent link to your
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Is there interest in this for www.lilypond.org?
>
> No. It's not our own server, and we're sucking up too much bandwidth
> as it is.
I didn't know that... Pity.
Ciao,
Dscho
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed a test wiki on
>
> http://132.187.3.68/wiki/index.php
>
> in which you can test the extension I wrote. I am sorry, the server is a
> little slow, but I hope that you can see how easy it is to embed notes in
> the wiki -- just hit 'edit' to vie
Hi,
I just installed a test wiki on
http://132.187.3.68/wiki/index.php
in which you can test the extension I wrote. I am sorry, the server is a
little slow, but I hope that you can see how easy it is to embed notes in
the wiki -- just hit 'edit' to view the source.
Is there interest in this for
77 matches
Mail list logo
