Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
> Did the original spanish page look at good examples of > other softwares? I don't read spanish, but it looks > real different from, say > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibelius_(software) For example, the Sibelius page only talks about other music printing programs ("competitors") at the bottom of the page, the LilyPond page[s] draw attention to other programs, guis and even proprietary software right at the second paragraph... etc. Finale's page does not mention any other music printing software at all. Probably it would be good to note canorus, denemo, musescore, noteedit, rosegarden, but at the very end? What about the openoffice plugin? Just some thoughts... Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
