Phil Holmes writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Not aiming to disappoint you further, I always wondered why there are so
many completely different WikiPedia pages for LilyPond. Most have their
some good and bad things in content and layout compared to the others.
Consider
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/LilyPond
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond [possibly one of the best]
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/LilyPond
http://??.wikipedia.org/wiki/[GNU_]LilyPond
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
