Hi,
the midi instrument name "orchestral strings" should be "orchestral harp"
instead. the following patch fixes it. I can't attach a file in gmane, so I'll
paste the git patch here.
Cheers,
Pedro Kroger
>From 526821c2cb340a5b6ad7a604f3bc9a0e9f0c3429 Mon
> Pedro, I was thinking of you specifically (being our Build-meister),
I guess this is a Build-meister job. I have no problem in doing it. But,
it's possible to cross-build it from linux? I have a very limited access
to a windows box. And it would be far more comfortable :-)
Anyway, I'm on my w
> Pedro, I was thinking of you specifically (being our Build-meister),
I guess this is a Build-meister job. I have no problem in doing it. But,
it's possible to cross-build it from linux? I have a very limited access
to a windows box. And it would be far more comfortable :-)
Anyway, I'm on my w
Hi,
I'm getting a "plain" font for dynamics with lily cvs (ChangeLog 1.3177).
The only error msg I get is:
programming error: Stencil::moved_to_edge: adding empty stencil.
The output can be seen here:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/da.ps.gz
this only happens with the ps backend. I sup
Hi,
I'm getting a "plain" font for dynamics with lily cvs (ChangeLog 1.3177).
The only error msg I get is:
programming error: Stencil::moved_to_edge: adding empty stencil.
The output can be seen here:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/da.ps.gz
this only happens with the ps backend. I sup
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're gonna be at the 2005 Linux Audio Conference in Karlsruhe
> (Germany). If there's any interest in a LilyPond
> Birds-Of-a-Feather/tutorial session, drop us a note, then we'll
> organise something.
now, *that* would be interesting!
Pedro
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See this thread
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-12/msg00053.html
thanks, it workded. I'm back on track again :-)
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's what I'm using.
thanks, it's working now.
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
I'm feeling a little stupid here, but the gnome backend is no longer
working.
I have gnome-devel installed. I run guile-gnome.sh and it installed
everything. I exported LD_LIBRARY_PATH and GUILE_LOAD_PATH (see the end
of this email) as expected.
The guile related packages I have:
ii guile
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes; this new code is so experimental that we don't install stuff
> yet. I'm still running from the source dir.
ok, I'm going to do the same. Could you, please, refresh my memory and
tell how to do that? :-) (I remember you posted something about it s
Pedro Kroger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've added a patch to CVS which will print the search ptah, so you can
>> inspect whether the correct directory is there.
ok, it compiled now, what I get is:
GNU LilyPon
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pedro Kroger writes:
>
>> GNU LilyPond 2.5.4
>> Processing `example-1.ly'
>> Parsing...
>> Interpreting music... error: cannot find `bigcheese20.otf'
>> Music font has not been installed pro
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fontconfig isn't needed for -fps output. Are you sure you have set
> all paths to run from the source dir? The file is looked up similar
> to the PFA and AFM files.
I don't run from the source dir, I install it in ~/usr/lilypond. (but,
yes, the pat
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm using fontforge 0.0.20041012
>
> You need a very, very recent fontforge; something last week's release.
thanks, I installed fontforge 0.0.20041203 and it worked. but if I run
lilypond I get:
GNU LilyPond 2.5.4
Processing `example-1.ly'
Parsing
I get this error message:
FontForge used to be named PfaEdit.
LoadTableFromFile: 0 No such script-file or buildin function
Called from...
bigcheese11.pe: 37
make: *** [out/bigcheese11.otf] Error 1
I'm using fontforge 0.0.20041012
Cheers,
Pedro
___
Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pedro, I know you're using something like debian/testing also.. do you have a
> clue of what could be wrong? Also, are you planning to make a gnome-enabled
> debian package of lily 2.5 soon? (in that case I could wait for that before
> testing gnome ou
The subject says all. I get this error message:
system.cc: In member function `scm_unused_struct* System::get_line()':
system.cc:426: error: 'class Paper_system' has no member named 'penalty_'
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Van den Borre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Is there a reason they're listed in the Lilypond download section as
> Debian Sid only? Maybe because Pedro only tests them on Sid?
yes. maybe I should include sarge on the donwload page done :-)
Pedro
___
Hi,
I asked in debian-mentors list if anyone could sponsor the
ec-fonts-mftraced package. One of the answer I got was this:
-
Nothing against packaging this, but are you sure that this is the only
font that lilypond can use? The Latin Modern fonts (package lmodern)
a
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My target for LilyPond is that it becomes the tool of choice for
> high-quality engraving, both for professionals and amateurs. More
> concretely spoken: to take the leading position in this area from
> SCORE, Finale and Sibelius.
that's really great
Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> buggy fontforge ; upgrade it.
>
> OK - Pedro, how do you get around this? I use version 0.0.20041012-1, which
> is
> the latest both in testing and unstable.
or downgrade it, I have 0.0.20040824-1 and never had a problem. maybe
the bug was introduced
Bertalan Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What an ITP is? Anyway, I'll happily maintain the ecfonts package
it's a debianism: Intend to Package
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You'll have to ask approval on cygwin-apps, or wait for
>> ec-fonts-mftraced to be included in Debian.
>
> So, what's the strategy? Are you planning to send an ITP?
My plan is to ask for a sponsor to upload the package. I've been
"fixing" the ec-fo
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You'll have to ask approval on cygwin-apps, or wait for
>> ec-fonts-mftraced to be included in Debian.
>
> So, what's the strategy? Are you planning to send an ITP?
My plan is to ask for a sponsor to upload the package. I've been
"fixing" the ec-fo
Hi all and specially Graham Percival,
I'm sending a few corrections to the manual in the patch attached. I
could have committed my changes, but I feel that it's a good idea if
Graham check them before they go to cvs.
Cheers,
Pedro
patch-docs-kroger-2004-10-12.gz
Description: Binary data
Hi people,
I'm working on a (e)bnf description of lilypond's syntax. It's not
finished yet but I've put it here:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/lilypond.ebnf
in case someone wants to give me suggestions.
Cheers,
Pedro Kroger
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 3.0 is almost ready. For the 3.0 release
that's great!
> 1. I've put back TeX as the default backend. I welcome patches that
> will Do The Right thing for encodings and landscape options of
> \bookpaper.
may I ask why have you put the TeX bac
lily-guile: installation problem: deprecated encoding requested: "feta-music"
Any ideas?
(in case you are wandering, I did run texhash)
Cheers,
Pedro Kroger
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
I'm wandering if I can change the definition of "program_name" in the
files in scripts/*.py from for instance:
program_name = 'midi2ly'
to
program_name = sys.argv[0]
It will not change the behavior of the programs whatsoever, but it'll
help me a lot, since I rename these programs in my "d
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is an old feature: It should mostly work unless something new is broken.
indeed. I've forgotten to add the "dash" after lilypond (sorry!)
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
Hi,
I'm wandering if the feature of reading from stdin (and maybe writing to
stdout) could be added to the upcoming 3.0.
Cheers,
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't think of anything to recommend other than
[snip]
sounds good to me. I think it hasn't to be in a section "official
guidelines" but could in something like "suggestions" (or whatever). You
could also put suggestions of how to deal with lily fil
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in 2.3, you will have to make several \book, each of which starts
> afresh on page 1.
I didn't know it could have several \book blocks! And it gerenates
different files for each block (like foo.ps, foo-1.ps, ...). That's
pretty cool!
Pedro
__
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will this patch also make it possible to reset the page numbering
> between scores if you have have several \score in the same
> .ly file?
I don't think so :-(
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> how about firstPageNumber ? (or firstpagenumber)
sounds good to me. I've changed to firstpagenumber. I commited the
changes and updated the manual.
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you, please, add me to the list too?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIA,
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Since the old `pagenumber' parameter of \paper is gone for the PS
>> backend (why?), what shall be used instead to make lilypond start on,
>> say, page 2? Looking into framework-ps.scm, function
>> `output-framework'
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> \bookpaper and \paper are basically the same internally. In practice,
> they are nested. \bookpaper defines default font sizes, as well as
> output scaling. \paper sets defintions for \score blocks. All settings
> in \bookpaper are defaults to \pap
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> you have a point there. The first part I checked this in (old B&H)
> does have the letter I, but lacks the letter J. Can anyone provide
> useful statistics? We're looking for the layout of classical
> orchestral material.
Here are some I have handy
Hi,
I implemented leftmargin in the \bookpaper block. rightmargin as an
option is still missing, but one can set it's value indirectly by
setting leftmargin and linewidth:
\bookpaper {
leftmargin = 3\cm
linewidth = 14\cm
}
if paper in this example is a4 (21 cm) rightmargin will be 4cm.
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It will require some hacking to get page layout done correctly within
> a Texinfo book format.
I actually meant to put just the code, without the result. I think
that it should be enough for this section. OTOH a page showing
graphically all page lay
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> they should be renamed to bottommargin.
>
> or you can do
>
> #(define bottom-margin (* 2 cm))
thanks! should/can I change the names in the manual? (and maybe put
and example)
Pedro
___
lilypond-dev
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > How about making top-margin and bottom-margin available as a variable
> > to be defined in "\paper" as well? It would also be terrific to have
> > things like left-margin and right-margin.
actually I just saw that the manual for 2.3.7 says that top
Hi,
I see that same values for page layout is defined in paper.scm, and a
few of them is hard-codded in set-paper-dimensions:
(define (set-paper-dimensions m w h)
"M is a module (i.e. paper->scope_ )"
(let* ((mm (eval 'mm m)))
(module-define! m 'hsize w)
(module-define! m 'vsize h)
* Matevz Jekovec ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On the main www.lilypond.org page the page behind ChangeLog for the
> latest 2.2.5 version is missing. There is a typo in URL (too many spaces).
Thanks, I've fixed this. Should be online in the next cron job.
Pedro
_
On Tue Jul 06, 2004 at 12:00:44AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> It looks like LilyPond uses another font than the PFA font that
> xlsfonts finds (see updated output-gnome.scm instructions).
Yah, I did the mkfontdir, xset thing already.
> Do you have the latest lilypond CVS (not much more than
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 06:36:04PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Pedro Kroger writes:
> > I'll recompile it, double checking if I missed something.
>
> That's easy: look at the bottom of lily/lily-guile.cc. If you're
> using a correct config.h, this should w
Hi,
What should I do if I want to fix small (and possibly harmless)
things (like the --enable-gui thing):
1. should I silently fix it (you'll figure it out from the cvs log)
2. should fix and post a message to the devel list
3. should ask if I should/could fix it
Pedro
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Could you verify that you have
> in your config.h?
[12:51:54] pythagoras kroger $ grep PANGO config.h
#define HAVE_PANGO_CVS 1
#define HAVE_PANGO_FC_FONT_MAP_ADD_DECODER_FIND_FUNC 1
I'll recompile it, double checking if I missed
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 05:05:14PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Is the description for --enable-gui supposed to be this?:
> opps. fixes are welcome. :)
ok, fixed in CVS :-)
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 10:58:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Great. You should tell LilyPond (ie, GUILE and the dynamic loader)
> about all this stuff you compiled (see output-gnome.scm)
thanks for your email. I've added the output-gnome.scm as a file to
be checked in the last announcement
sh guile-gnome.sh now runs fine and compile ok. But, what am I
supposed to do next? just compile lilypond (without any extra
--option?). I did that and got an error:
[13:00:54] pythagoras kroger $ lilypond-bin -f 'gnome' example-2.ly
Now processing `example-2.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
On Mon Jun 28, 2004 at 12:05:47AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Anyway, source specials is not working well in my box (cvs emacs,
> > server.el untouched). Sometimes it works, sometimes I click in an
> > instrument in the xdvi and the code shown is of another
> > instrument. Sometimes I get e
Hi,
Is the patch for server.el still necessary with cvs emacs? I get 3 out
of 4 hunks failed when applying the patch. The code of server.el is
not equal of the patch, but it seems to be very similar.
Anyway, source specials is not working well in my box (cvs emacs,
server.el untouched). Sometimes
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the GNOME output but I got this error message:
make[3]: Entrando no diret#rio
`/home/kroger/lilypond/lilypond/buildscripts/test/guile-gnome/=build/glib/gnome/gw'
guile -c \
"(debug-set! stack 20) \
(use-modules (g-wrap)) \
(use-modules (gnome gw gobject-spe
* Anthony Fok ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Jan, if possible, please remove these files from the upstream source
> tree:
>
> debian/lilypond1.7*.dirs
> debian/lilypond.dirs
> debian/postinst
> debian/prerm
> debian/postrm
Thank you for your fine work and prompt respon
* Carl Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I built lilypond 2.3.5 under Fedora. I had trouble with the images
> (none were found), but proceeded to make install. Lilypond apparently
> installed OK, as I can process .ly files. However, every time I do, I
> get the following messages:
Download
* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Let Y even, Z odd.
> 1. packages lilypondX.Y contain stable versions of lilypond.
> 2. package lilypond-stable (or just lilypond) depends on the latest
> lilypondX.Y package.
> 3. package lilypond-unstable contains the latest unstable version.
> (this w
* Bertalan Fodor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Are there any packages with images in the info directory?
If you are using debian woody I recommend Ferenc Wagner's
packages. They are reported to work in testing and sid debian as
well. If you are insane^Wbrave you can try my packages for
2.3.3. Check
The title says it all.
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
* Werner LEMBERG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Just curious: Is there any other project which uses Guile as
> extensively as LilyPond? I would like to have a comparison.
The guile webpage lists quite a few:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/gnu-guile-projects.html
"snd" uses guile heavily, for s
* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have 2 suggestions here (which are more food for thought than opinions):
> 1. How about adding two metapackages 'lilypond-stable' and
> 'lilypond-unstable' (or whatever the names would be), depending on the
latest
> lilypondX.Y package? This would el
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You should have makeinfo 4.7, emacs CVS to see them, and info/pictures
> installed as:
so emacs is the reason I was unable to see the pictures (I have
21.3). I'm going to compile it from cvs (oh boy! I hope I don't have
to make unofficial packages o
* Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't know about the package naming conventions in Debian, but
> wouldn't it be better to use a name like lilypond (without version
> number) for the stable versions and lilypond-unstable (or whatever)
> for the unstable versions. Otherwise, you will
Hi folks,
[it's a long email, sorry]
As you know I started a new "branch" in the debian package. It's based
on the previous work by Fok but I deleted the unnecessary stuff (like
specific code for lily 1.3 and 1.7 for example) and made it
"independent" of the stable one, i.e., you can have both in
Hi,
I have been asking a few packagers to update their stable
packages. For instance, the latest FreeBSD package is 2.1.22 instead
of 2.2.1. The few I contacted said they would be happy to update as
soon as possible, given their limited time. that's just fine.
Should I nag^H^H^Hask them to packag
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You should already have write access, can you try? Problem is that
> you currently need to notify Han-Wen or me to get it installed (from
> CVS). We may want to automate that with a cron job.
Should I notify you guys privately or through the maili
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> it looks as if you didn't rebuild the binary.
yep, I did. But it was my fault anyway. I was patching the scripts at
lilypond/scripts (to be able to run "lilypond2.3" and the like)
*before* the compilation. Now I'll do it after the compilation and in
Hi,
the subject says all. (I have guile 1.6). Here is what I get:
--
/usr/bin/python ../scripts/lilypond.py --output=out-www/simple.dvi simple.ly
lilypond2.3 (GNU LilyPond) @TOPLEVEL_VERSION@
Running lilypond-bin2.3...
N
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Passwords do not work. Re-check your key entry into savannah, one
> long line for one key (check the number of keys), or mail to the
> savannah-hackers list.
I rechecked my key and it worked. Thanks for the help.
Pedro
_
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You may try debug logging first, add to your .ssh/config
> and see if it tells you anything interesting.
Thanks, that helped. But unfortunately the problem remains. Here is
what happened:
---
[08:
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You've been added; go ahead with the web update.
Great, BUT:
I can't access the cvs as "kroger". If I issue:
export CVS_RSH=ssh
cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/lilypond co newweb
It ask me for a password, not a passphrase. Even if I type the
p
* Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I definitely support the idea of a feature request list.
> Having a list on paper should make it easier to prioritize
> and it may also happen that when you see the full list, you
> find out that one change in the code could solve a number of
> these re
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> good point. Can you set up yourself an account at savannah?
Yep. Just did it. My login is kroger. I don't know if it was necessary
but I requested for inclusion in the lilypond group.
Pedro
P.S. just to let you guys know, my personal email is kroge
Hi,
Since the bugs reports are being organized now, do you think that the
request for features should also be organized? It doesn't have to be
anything fancy, a plain list would do.
Pedro
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.g
pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/";>here
-2.1.34
-mailto:kroegerlistasATpedrokroegerDOTnet";>Pedro Kroger
+2.2.1
+mailto:kroegerATpedrokroegerDOTnet";>Pedro Kröger
@@ -247,6 +247,25 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Debi
Hi,
Where can I find the sources for the website? There is a cvs module on
savannah but it doesn't seem to contain the current website. That's
the command I used to fetch it:
cvs -z3 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/webcvs/lilypond co lilypond
Pedro
___
lil
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> thanks for your suggestions? Could I ask you (or anyone else, for that
> matter), to put these suggestions into a patch, so I (or anyone with
> CVS access) can readily integrate it?
ok, I'll do that. The reason I didn't was because they w
Hi,
I'm reading again the manual and it has really improved! Congrats!
This is a list of small corrections and suggestions:
introduction.itely cvs 1.97
=
l. 494:
"Score context" has no definition. would be nice to have, since
"Staff Context" and "Voice Context" h
* Werner LEMBERG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Finally it's uploaded. All bugs lie in one big directory; this will
> > probably be changed to something better as soon as we can see
> > exactly what we need.
>
> What's the name of this bug-repository? I've missed this somehow.
lily-bugs
i.e.
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > I'll start my job pestering^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hencouraging the Debian
> > maintainer to update to 2.2, specially because of the new info
>
> How about taking over official Debian maintainership?
I'm preparing myself
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Maintain the definition/description of build meister.
ok, no problem.
> 1. have his package/CVS in a good state
> 2. be [one of] the first to find out something extra is needed for
> his platform (in your case Debian package), or tha
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Can I ask you, Pedro, to take responsibility for builds, and you,
> Erik, to be in charge of the bugs? Of course, you could help each
> other with the other tasks.
sure, count on me.
> To this end, the build-meister
> * Regularly (say, once a wee
* Nicolas Sceaux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Bonjour Mats!
>
> Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:46:32 +0200, tu as dit :
>
> > Interesting to see such a long list of comments at linuxfr in just
> > a few days. Too bad I don't understand French.
for some reason (firewall?) I can't access the page :-(
Woul
I definitely want to get more involved with lilypond development! Of
course there is always the question if I'm brilliant enough :-)))
[http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/]
I think I could work in one of these tasks:
> BUILD-MEISTER
> BUG-MEISTER
> NEWSLETTER EDITOR
But I prefer to wai
> This release marks the end of an era for me. For the past years I've
> hacked on LilyPond during my (PhD)study and unemployment. Tomorrow, I
> will start a regular job as logistics consultant, which means that
> from now on I won't be able to fix LilyPond bugs within the hour.
Congratulations on
> Have you tested? I think they won't work; note-names cannot contain
> digits.
you're right. I tested a few notes but forgot to test the ones with
numbers. I'm sending a corrected version. and .. yes, I tested every
single note now :-)
=
%{
Common Portuguese na
Hi,
Here are Portuguese names for notes. As I guess we still cannot send
files to the list I'm sending the content of "portugues.py" in this
email.
I did some basic testing but would be nice to have real users testing
(I only use the default lilypond duch names). The syntax for
quarter-tones is q
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> We have actually gotten to the point that we have a slight dislike for
> C++ as an implementation language. I recommend to learn Scheme and
I'm learning C++ to use in sound synthesis programs and to be able to
hack lilypond. Could you share a litte m
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Structure & Interpretation of Computer Programs by Abelson and
> Sussman (this book has a very wide scope, and contains way more
> information than you need for LilyPond hacking, but it's a wonderful
> book)
The full book is available here:
http:/
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There may be a small problem with the Debian packages for 2.1.29.
> Trying to install either I get:
>
> Unpacking lilypond-doc (from .../lilypond-doc_2.1.29-1_all.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/lilypond-doc_2.1.29-1
Hi,
Lilypond fails to compile latest cvs, Changelog 1.1707:
==
Now processing: `lily-2003481231.ly'
Parsing...warning: Can't find property type-check for `octavation'
(music-type?). Perhaps you made a typing error?
lilypond-book:
Hi,
in the section "More about pitches" of tutorial.itely the example
around line 476 has a minor mistake, the "e" in "g8 d4.~ d e'8" (line
483) shoudn't have the "'" sign. The correct is "g8 d4.~ d e8".
Pedro
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PR
* Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Of course, Anthony's solution is neat but requires that the
> package maintainer is always up-to-date with the changes in
> LilyPond and might cause a real mess if someone wants to
> build and install a development version of LilyPond somewhere
> else o
Mats,
> Maybe this is a non-issue, but could you please verify if
> dvips -Ppdf -u +lilypond.map myscore.dvi
> works correctly with the Debian installation.
No it doesn't :-(
I'll file a bug report to debian, but before, could you tell me how
this is addressed in other distributions? Maybe I'll
Hi folks,
Maybe you want to apply this tiny-little-small patch I'm sending
(against ChangLog 1.1362). It makes small corrections in the
debian/rules file.
Pedro
Index: debian/rules
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/lilypond/lilypond/debian/rule
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Of course this solved my problem, but on a second thought, shouldn't
> > the behavior be changed when unbeamed notes like 1/4 is (accidentally
> > or not) put inside a beamed group like c4[ d'8 e f g] ? Sure lilypond
>
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > There is a bug in 1.9.x with beams across barlines (it was working in
> > 1.8 for sure). The note _before_ the beamed group gets a stem with the
> > same size and direction of the stem of the beamed notes, as if it were
> > part of the group. Here i
Hi,
I've notice that ties aren't working across \relative blocks like:
\score {
\new Staff \notes {
\relative c {
c'1 ~
}
\relative c {
c'4 d e f
}
}
\paper { }
}
The funny thing is, if I remove the first "\relative c" (and jus
Hi,
I know an identifier can't have numbers, underscores, or dashes but I'd
really appreciate if at least dashes were allowed. I'd love to be able
to write identifiers like:
\this-is-my-identifier
Would that be possible?
Pedro
___
Lilypond-devel mai
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
