* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Let Y even, Z odd. > 1. packages lilypondX.Y contain stable versions of lilypond. > 2. package lilypond-stable (or just lilypond) depends on the latest > lilypondX.Y package. > 3. package lilypond-unstable contains the latest unstable version. > (this way we don't need any lilypondX.Z packages)
Sounds pretty reasonable to me. In 2. I prefer just "lilypond" instead of "lilypond-stable". > Sounds good. And before doing anything, please think through all > dependencies twice. That's a good piece of advice. In fact I have to sit down one day and double check this. > We don't want to need any dummy transition packages ever (such as > lilypond1.3); there should maybe be a good way to obsolete all > earlier packages. I agree, but OTOH debian has very strong policies about upgrading (and downgrading) so sometimes a dummy package may be necessary (I'm sure a more experienced debian developer can explain why). Pedro _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
