Hi, I have been asking a few packagers to update their stable packages. For instance, the latest FreeBSD package is 2.1.22 instead of 2.2.1. The few I contacted said they would be happy to update as soon as possible, given their limited time. that's just fine.
Should I nag^H^H^Hask them to package the unstable releases as well? That would be just great, but since the 2.3 series is a lot experimental, I don't know if they would/will care for packing them. On a second thought, even if they don't pack them and distribute on the net, I guess it'd good enough to know if the code compiles in flavors and architectures other then debian and fedora. What do you think? Pedro _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
