>> As written earlier, I see absolutely no reason why the stems for
>> the beamed 128th must be that long. IMHO, they could be moved down
>> one staff space. Am I missing something?
>
> Maybe it's done in order to visually separate beams with staff
> symbol. 128th beam consists of five lines,
This works perfectly!
Thanks ever so much.
If anyone is curious to see how this looks, I have a sight-singing blog,
http://moveabledo.com Moveable Do , that I'm putting together using Lilypond
and some other resources.
Best,
- Eugene
Neil Puttock wrote:
>
> On 7 March 2011 21:11, emw
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:00:27PM +, James Lowe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> -Original Message-
> >Stupid question: since I can see no use for following a fingering with a
> >digit, why don't we just change the parser appropriately? _If_ there is
> >some use for numbers greater than 10 (apart
Hello
From: Trevor Daniels [t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: 11 March 2011 20:43
To: James Lowe
Cc: Lily-Devel List
Subject: Indexing the new spacing properties
Hi James
I just noticed that none of the new spacing properties
in spacing.itely have @funindex en
LGTM, go ahead and push after fixing Neil's thing.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4248081/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:25:45PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/3/10 Francisco Vila :
> > I'm wondering if we really need translated html pages for Internals
> > Reference, which contain only untranslated material.
No, those should be cleaned up. Thanks, added as;
http://code.google.com/p/
Just a reminder that any developer is more than welcome to add
issues directly to the tracker. If you're confident that you've
identified a bug -- or even if you're not confident in that
itself, but at least you're confident that you're more familiar
with the topic than the bug squad volunteers --
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup
Organization: Organization?!?
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:47:41 +0100
To: Lilypond Dev
Subject: Re: PATCH - DOC: Added @knownissue to NR for fingering
>James Lowe writes:
>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4248081/
>>
>> Doc: Added @knownissu
2011/3/10 Graham Percival :
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:42:11AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/3/9 Han-Wen Nienhuys
>> > You can easily try this out yourself. Just set ragged-right=##t and
>> > set linelength to 100 meters (or something). You may need to remove
>> > some internal sanity che
Hmm, i raised this issue because it looked to me as if it was
overlooked by developers, but engraving books seem to be clear here
and LilyPond is in fact doing the right job. While personally i
dislike current looks of the output, i won't argue with authorities
here. Let's leave it as it is now.
2
Hi James
I just noticed that none of the new spacing properties
in spacing.itely have @funindex entries. These are
needed so people can follow-up error messages like
"staff-affinities should only decrease"
Do you fancy adding them, or shall I do it?
Trevor
_
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:12:59 -0800, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Technical correctness probably has little merit if no player
supports it, but it is worth a try. Setting ports should be
quite easy and if major players support this, we're safe.
I know nothing about this, but some other people wi
Keith OHara schreef op vr 11-03-2011 om 09:16 [-0800]:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:32:39 -0800, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> The structure that *can* contain several channels is a Port, separate
> Ports corresponding to separate cables in the hardware. One can
> optionally specify a different Port fo
[snip]
You said: "I don't have CentruryS*...". I assume this is a typo in the
mail, and you were searching for the right family?
FWIW I use Vista, and I did install some other fonts a month or so ago. If
I use your original file (no font substitution) I get
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: fo
Phil,
One step back two steps forward (yes I did say that right)
)-Original Message-
)From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
)Sent: 11 March 2011 17:41
)To: James Lowe; '-Eluze'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: using \sans on Windows gives 'gs' error (2.13.53) fails
)tocompil
[snip again]
OK - it's a bit blind leading the blind here, but perhaps a font-person will
step in at some point.
You can get all the fonts on your system with the following command:
lilypond -dshow-available-fonts x > fonts.txt 2>&1
It'll redirect the output to fonts.txt and you can view it
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
)Sent: 11 March 2011 15:50
)To: James Lowe; '-Eluze'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: using \sans on Windows gives 'gs' error (2.13.53) fails
)tocompile
)
)James,
)
)Try adding the line:
)
)#(ly:set-option 'del
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:32:39 -0800, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Neil Puttock schreef op do 10-03-2011 om 21:41 [+]:
both voices will still be allocated the same channel
Why would that be a problem? They're in different tracks.
Are you saying that the instrument of channel 0 of track 1
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
)Sent: 11 March 2011 15:50
)To: James Lowe; '-Eluze'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: using \sans on Windows gives 'gs' error (2.13.53) fails
)tocompile
)
)James,
)
)Try adding the line:
)
)#(ly:set-option 'del
On Mar 11, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> can fix the below points before continuing with pushing stuff for this
> patch series?
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
>> +// ugh...code dup...hopefully can be consolidated w/ above one day
>
> can you make a prior
On 2011/03/07 01:38:36, Colin Campbell wrote:
Ah, I was thinking that \partcombineautomatic once would go automatic
for one
note, then return to whatever was in force before it was called. If
you would
confirm that, I'll reword the explanation to suit.
Yes, that's exactly how it works:
-)
James,
Try adding the line:
#(ly:set-option 'delete-intermediate-files #f)
to your LilyPond source, then have a look at the PostScript file and see
what fonts it's trying to use.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu
http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/1/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/1/lily/beam.cc#newcode620
lily/beam.cc:620: {
it would be nice if you could collapse all of the if (feather) code.
You're duplicating an awful lot of logic.
http://cod
Hi Mike,
can fix the below points before continuing with pushing stuff for this
patch series?
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
> +// ugh...code dup...hopefully can be consolidated w/ above one day
can you make a priority to do this right now? If it's not done
directly, 'one day' usually
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of James Lowe
)Sent: 10 March 2011 17:54
)To: 'Phil Holmes'; '-Eluze'; 'lilypond-devel@gnu.org'
)Subject: RE: using \sans on
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:04 AM, wrote:
>> this looks wrong - different broken pieces cannot ever share a
>
> commonx.
>
> Odd - it gets correct results for some reason (I honestly don't know
> how...).
Lily tries not to crash, and things may just work in this case, but
better not rely on it.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, zhangxy wrote:
> Dear hanwen,
> Now I want to analyze the test coverage of Lilypond. I find the option
> -dtrace-scheme-coverage. It says that the option can record coverage of
> Scheme files in `FILE.cov'. Then I do the following
>>
>> lilypond -dtrace-scheme-cov
On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:11 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:02 PM, bordage.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> There is still a vertical spacing bug in the footnotes :
>> \markup {
>> \footnote e e
>> \footnote e ef
>> }
>> There should be a fixed distance between the baseline
Keith OHara schreef op do 10-03-2011 om 18:15 [-0800]:
> > It works for me, [...]
>
> Oh! Thanks for checking.
> I'll post a report on the bug list with the (very tiny) midi files and see if
> it's just my midi players (timidity and WMP)
Thanks. Note that I now found that if there are two vo
Neil Puttock schreef op do 10-03-2011 om 21:41 [+]:
> On 10 March 2011 21:04, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Doesn't that still fall foul of the lack of synchronization between
> Staff_performer instances though? For example, if I have two staves
> with one voice each, both voices will still be
Hello,
2011/3/10 Carl Sorensen
>
> If you could get a closer shot of the desired clefs, I'd be happy to have a
> discussion with you about how much you're willing to pay for the clefs.
>
>
Here it is:
http://gregoriana.sk/gg/wp-content/uploads/c-clef1.png
http://gregoriana.sk/gg/wp-content/uploa
31 matches
Mail list logo
