On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:00:27PM +0000, James Lowe wrote: > Hello, > > -----Original Message----- > >Stupid question: since I can see no use for following a fingering with a > >digit, why don't we just change the parser appropriately? _If_ there is > >some use for numbers greater than 10 (apart from the current situation, > >button accordion fingerings may need to be underlined in order to > >indicate helper rows, and one could likely just put something in the > >engraver which does this for numbers greater 10, deducting 10 in the > >process), rather than making yet-another-LSR-snippet, we could just > >allow larger numbers.
Sounds good to me! > Well there's no rush for this specific patch, so it can wait for a while > in case anyone wants to chime in/add some code change. > > I agree that another LSR is not ideal, but we need to do something I think. I don't think we need a LSR snippet; let's just add the @knownissue now. Unless David thinks he can make a patch in a few days...? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
