Hello, -----Original Message----- From: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> Organization: Organization?!? Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:47:41 +0100 To: Lilypond Dev <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> Subject: Re: PATCH - DOC: Added @knownissue to NR for fingering
>James Lowe <james.l...@datacore.com> writes: > >> http://codereview.appspot.com/4248081/ >> >> Doc: Added @knownissue to NR for fingering >> >> By default double-digit fingering (i.e. >9) is not possible using >> normal fingering markups. There is an LSR that has been posted for >>approval >> at the time of this patch, and will be included in the snippet link in >>the >> @seealso already in this section. >> >> Tidied up some grammar and minor punctuation changes. >> >> --- >> >> Came out of >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/62604 > >Stupid question: since I can see no use for following a fingering with a >digit, why don't we just change the parser appropriately? _If_ there is >some use for numbers greater than 10 (apart from the current situation, >button accordion fingerings may need to be underlined in order to >indicate helper rows, and one could likely just put something in the >engraver which does this for numbers greater 10, deducting 10 in the >process), rather than making yet-another-LSR-snippet, we could just >allow larger numbers. > >Any reason not to? > Well there's no rush for this specific patch, so it can wait for a while in case anyone wants to chime in/add some code change. I agree that another LSR is not ideal, but we need to do something I think. James > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
