Hello lilypond developers,
At http://codereview.appspot.com/1385041, you will find a patch that
implements several woodwind diagrams (piccolo, flute, oboe, clarinet, bass
clarinet, saxophone, bassoon, and contrabassoon) in Lilypond. I would very
much appreciate any and all comments on this new
On 5/27/10 2:58 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
>> I saw the comment from David not as a suggestion to build an automated
>> process for feeding the erroneous strings, but as a one-time testing
>> suggestion. Hence my request for help.
>
> I'm not sure what t
2010/5/27 William Bajzek :
> On May 27, 2010, at 8:33 AM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>
>> Did you ever try LilyBuntu? IIRC, you were trying to get it set up on your
>> Mac without success, and when Graham suggested you try LilyBuntu you were
>> too disgusted with the time you'd spent tr
On May 27, 2010, at 8:33 AM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> Did you ever try LilyBuntu? IIRC, you were trying to get it set up on your
> Mac without success, and when Graham suggested you try LilyBuntu you were
> too disgusted with the time you'd spent trying to get it going on your Mac
Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
> I saw the comment from David not as a suggestion to build an automated
> process for feeding the erroneous strings, but as a one-time testing
> suggestion. Hence my request for help.
I'm not sure what the purpose would be for an error test in this case, since the
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:56 PM, James Lowe wrote:
> Well I need some snippet practice I guess. However I have to wait for it to
> be committed to the 'tree' right so I can download the version of LilyPond
> that has that new function in it?
Yes.
If you want to start working on stuff in Document
Carl,
Carl Sorensen wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1332042
Assuming this gets approved/pushed or whatever it is that 'happens' to code.
Does this mean we need another example in the doc to show this 'new'
feature? If so, let me know where in the doc and I can perhaps look at
updating i
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 5/27/10 11:55 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> Nobody should be building the regtests without installing git.
>> Developers need git. Bug Squad people should look at the official
>> online regtests.
>
> For developers, the primary inf
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> - I'm not so certain about [...]
>
> Will do. I'm a bit rusty WRT doc work. (Or LilyPond work at all, really.)
It might be a good idea to either send a patch to me privately
On 5/27/10 11:55 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Valentin Villenave
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I began writing CG doc for regtests, and tried to put myself
>> in the shoes of an hypothetical contribu
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Nobody should be building the regtests without installing git.
> Developers need git. Bug Squad people should look at the official
> online regtests.
Granted.
> No, because
> 1) the CG is not written sequentially
> 2) the CG is not suppo
On 5/27/10 11:53 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
> Hello
>
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> Here's a patch, from Hraban as modified by Neil, that allows printing minor
>> chords with lower-case names, instead of with a "m" suffix.
>>
>> Please review:
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1332042
>
> Assum
Hello
Carl Sorensen wrote:
Here's a patch, from Hraban as modified by Neil, that allows printing minor
chords with lower-case names, instead of with a "m" suffix.
Please review:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1332042
Assuming this gets approved/pushed or whatever it is that 'happens' to code.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> We do *not* want
>> info about download a tarball as the first section in CG 2. In fact,
>> we don't want it anywhere in CG 2 at all. If people are desperate for
>> this, it
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Adding info about the regtests to the Regression chapter is good.
Thanks.
> - I'm not so certain about [...]
Will do. I'm a bit rusty WRT doc work. (Or LilyPond work at all, really.)
> ... err... actually... shouldn't the "make check" s
Adding info about the regtests to the Regression chapter is good.
- I'm not so certain about having relative @urefs{}, since they'll be
broken for the big-page output. Either use @rweb{} to the Development
page, or a @uref directly to lilypond.org.
- @example should have no indentation inside it.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> What the bloody mao have you been smoking, Valentin?
Hi Graham,
nice to see you too :)
> We do *not* want
> info about download a tarball as the first section in CG 2. In fact,
> we don't want it anywhere in CG 2 at all. If people are d
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hopefully, when Lilypond is ready to make my development startup easy, I'll
> have time for Lilypond development. In the meantime, perhaps I can send diff
> files -- if that process isn't too difficult -- for simple(r) patches, like
> m
What the bloody mao have you been smoking, Valentin? We do *not* want
info about download a tarball as the first section in CG 2. In fact,
we don't want it anywhere in CG 2 at all. If people are desperate for
this, it's in CG 3.3.
More generally, we don't need people randomly changing the "fini
Please review this patch submitted by Kieren:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1347041
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi Graham and Carl,
> Thanks, for clarifying the > foo.diff part. I forgot that part of it.
Okay, I've attached the diff file.
Cheers,
Kieren.
dmc.diff
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu
On 5/27/10 9:38 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>> Hopefully, when Lilypond is ready to make my development startup easy, I'll
>> have time for Lilypond development. In the meantime, perhaps I can send diff
>> files -- if that process
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hopefully, when Lilypond is ready to make my development startup easy, I'll
> have time for Lilypond development. In the meantime, perhaps I can send diff
> files -- if that process isn't too difficult -- for simple(r) patches, like
> m
Hi Graham,
> could I ask you to stop immediately and wait a few months?
OK.
My (Lilypond-engraved) musical is getting another production in July with me
MD-ing; my (Lilypond-engraved) quartet is getting two new performances and a CD
release this summer; I've got three new commissions I've got
On 5/27/10 8:43 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 5/27/10 8:15 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>> I think one should try to feed erroneous strings to the includable lexer
>>> and look at the resulting error messages. That's probab
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> 2. If it doesn't work, it's the last attempt I will make, probably ever.
If it's not too late, could I ask you to stop immediately and wait a few months?
Before I start the Grand Organization Project, I will ensure that
whatever parts
Hi Graham,
> From
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/using-a-virtual-machine-to-compile-lilypond
Thanks -- install in progress.
For the record, since this is the third significant effort I'm making to get a
Lilypond development environment set up:
1. I'm going to NRTFM
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
>> Did you ever try LilyBuntu?
>
> No. What virtualization tool should I use?
From
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/using-a-virtual-machine-to-compile-lilypond
--
We do not necessarily recommend
Hi Carl,
> Did you ever try LilyBuntu?
No. What virtualization tool should I use?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 5/27/10 8:15 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> I think one should try to feed erroneous strings to the includable lexer
>> and look at the resulting error messages. That's probably hard to do
>> with a regtest (since the regtest is not s
Hi Carl,
> Can you send a diff version of the patch, so that I can apply it?
Can you describe [or link to an explanation of] how I would do that, without a
dev environment set up?
I simply manually edited the .scm file.
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-de
On 5/27/10 8:10 AM, "Kieren MacMillan"
wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
>> what are the top 3-5 things that make starting to contribute hard?
>
> For me [even though you didn't ask] it's the build system, which I spent over
> two days -- on two different occasions -- trying to get set up on my machine,
>
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Jean-Charles Malahieude
wrote:
> Le 26/05/2010 20:37, Graham Percival disait :
>>
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.13.22/Documentation/fr/usage/latex-example.latex
>
> Because, if I'm not mistaken, the two .latex files in this directory are not
>
On 5/27/10 8:10 AM, "Kieren MacMillan"
wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
>> what are the top 3-5 things that make starting to contribute hard?
>
> For me [even though you didn't ask] it's the build system, which I spent over
> two days -- on two different occasions -- trying to get set up on my machine,
>
On 5/27/10 8:15 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> Benjamin Peterson prepared a patch to fix this issue.
>>
>> It's in the lexer, and I'm not at all comfortable with the lexer. However,
>> the patch has been demonstrated to work and to not break the regtests.
>>
>> Pl
Hi Carl,
> what are the top 3-5 things that make starting to contribute hard?
For me [even though you didn't ask] it's the build system, which I spent over
two days -- on two different occasions -- trying to get set up on my machine,
to no avail.
Speaking of "starting to contribute", are there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, um 15:39:46 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> Benjamin Peterson prepared a patch to fix this issue.
>
> It's in the lexer, and I'm not at all comfortable with the lexer. However,
> the patch has been demonstrated to work and to no
Carl Sorensen writes:
> Benjamin Peterson prepared a patch to fix this issue.
>
> It's in the lexer, and I'm not at all comfortable with the lexer. However,
> the patch has been demonstrated to work and to not break the regtests.
>
> Please review this patch.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/13
On 5/27/10 7:05 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Valentin Villenave writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>> nobody really felt that actually committing the patches was their job.
>
> The problem is that committing a patch suggests some basic
> responsibility. I
Here's a patch, from Hraban as modified by Neil, that allows printing minor
chords with lower-case names, instead of with a "m" suffix.
Please review:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1332042
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@
Benjamin Peterson prepared a patch to fix this issue.
It's in the lexer, and I'm not at all comfortable with the lexer. However,
the patch has been demonstrated to work and to not break the regtests.
Please review this patch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1345041
Thanks,
Carl
__
Valentin Villenave writes:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>
>> We have 10 issues with patches attached; 3 of them fixing Critical
>> issues. Some people might view this as a positive thing -- hey, we
>> have people sending fixes! -- but I'm counting this as "ugly" b
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:06:47PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > In the "avoid losing info" side of things, although I'm cautiously
> > optimistic that any *new* info won't be lost, we still have a number
> > of lost items from the
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
> Anyone/anything LilyPond going on at the lgm?
>
> I'm thinking of going there for a day.
Too bad I'm so busy at the moment. Otherwise I'd happily have met you there! :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> In the "avoid losing info" side of things, although I'm cautiously
> optimistic that any *new* info won't be lost, we still have a number
> of lost items from the past few months, and no volunteers to go on an
> archival dig. I know that a
Anyone/anything LilyPond going on at the lgm?
I'm thinking of going there for a day.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
___
lilypond-devel mailing l
46 matches
Mail list logo
