On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > Adding info about the regtests to the Regression chapter is good.
Thanks. > - I'm not so certain about [...] Will do. I'm a bit rusty WRT doc work. (Or LilyPond work at all, really.) > ... err... actually... shouldn't the "make check" stuff be the *only* > discussion about regtests here? I mean, we do **not** want Bug Squad > members to be compiling anything; they should just check the latest > official online regtests. If somebody wants to check to see if a > patch breaks anything, they'll want "make check" to automatically > compare stuff, not manually looking at the output of "make test", > right? I'm about to push the part about online checking. As for the make check/ make redo/ make whatnot part, I'll write this as a draft but I hope someone will check and correct my wild guesses. It's not like I'm familiar with this stuff at all... :-/ Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
