Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > Benjamin Peterson prepared a patch to fix this issue. > > It's in the lexer, and I'm not at all comfortable with the lexer. However, > the patch has been demonstrated to work and to not break the regtests. > > Please review this patch. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/1345041
I think one should try to feed erroneous strings to the includable lexer and look at the resulting error messages. That's probably hard to do with a regtest (since the regtest is not supposed to produce errors), but it would provide some sanity check with regard to the error mechanisms tracking the right input. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
