Hi,
I have yet another suggestion for how \relative can be soft-coded in a generic
way. It's inspired by criticism of earlier attempts. It's similar, but not
identical, to a previous suggestion.
Macros is that they operate on syntax, not on music. And the parser spits out
music directly. So wh
On Thursday 11 May 2006 00:54, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> 2006/5/10, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Citerar Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Known issue: unfold-repeats will probably not work for percent
> > > I don't understand this. unfold-repeats is on the front end, we can
>
> Sorry, it was a French-ism, where it looks like the Swedish way:
> "A, respectivement B, ..."
In German we have the same: `A bzw. B' (where `bzw.' is short for
`beziehungsweise').
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
(Current cvs)
$ make
...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/mf'
/usr/bin/fontforge -script ../buildscripts/pfx2ttf.fontforge /usr/X11R6/l...
Copyright (c) 2000-2005 by George Williams.
Executable based on sources from 12:08 5-Dec-2005.
MergeKern: Failed
>
> Running whith e.g python 2.3.5 gives me:
>
> $ make
> ...
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/scripts'
> cat convert-ly.py | sed -e '#' -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/bin/sh!g' -e
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> chmod 755 out/convert-ly
> /usr/bin/perl /home/karl
Mats Bengtsson schreef:
A related question, how do you define a music function that takes
a string or a markup as an argument?
You don't. It has to take either a markup or a string.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for
Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef:
how is it that there are binary packages for some systems for 2.8.2,
but no source?
good point. I forgot to upload.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-des
Running whith e.g python 2.3.5 gives me:
$ make
...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/scripts'
cat convert-ly.py | sed -e '#' -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/bin/sh!g' -e '[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
chmod 755 out/convert-ly
/usr/bin/perl /home/karl/most/music/lilypond
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Paul Scott wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes --
Sure it does. The original DOS came from some version of Unix.
Redirection and pipes have always been there. I just taught their use
this
Hi,
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Paul Scott wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes --
> Sure it does. The original DOS came from some version of Unix.
> Redirection and pipes have always been there. I just taught their use
> this week in a WXP class.
At least
Graham Percival wrote:
On 11-May-06, at 7:01 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:30, Graham Percival wrote:
Processing `bug.ly'
Parsing...(make-music
'SequentialMusic
Try redirecting stderr and stdout to different files:
lilypond bug.ly 2>err >out
and you'll understand
how is it that there are binary packages for some systems for 2.8.2,
but no source?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, 12 May 2006 05:38, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> 2006/5/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > So it seems 2.8.1 is linked statically with libstdc++ and 2.9.4 isn't.
> > > Is this intentional?
> >
> > No, there was a packaging error with GCC that slipped through in the
> > installer.
>
A related question, how do you define a music function that takes
a string or a markup as an argument?
For the documentation, we should include a list of predicates (is this
the correct term) to use to specify the
argument type for all commonly occuring arguments, including:
Music expression -
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> What does resp mean? I'm guessing something like "and"? Is it
>> Dutch, or Latin?
>>
>> "One can not feed the #:line (resp #:center, #:column) command with
>> a variable ..."
>> "One should use the make-line-markup (resp.,
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the current manual, define-music-function is introduced late in the
> scheme chapter. I suspect that this is simply because
> define-music-function is a more recent lilypond construct, and whoever
> added it didn't want to disturb the existing mate
2006/5/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So it seems 2.8.1 is linked statically with libstdc++ and 2.9.4 isn't. Is this
> intentional?
No, there was a packaging error with GCC that slipped through in the
installer.
can you try the latest 2.9.4 build?
thanks
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAI
Geoff Horton wrote:
OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on
linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- can I assume
that anybody on windows would be using cygwin/bash ?
I don't think so. There's not even a cygwin version of 2.8 available.
You
Since these details on the input and output of the Scheme functions are
described in 11.2.3, we could skip it. Or reformulate it into something
like:
"Markups are implemented as special Scheme functions, that produce a
Stencil object given a number of arguments."
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote
OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on
linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- can I assume
that anybody on windows would be using cygwin/bash ?
I don't think so. There's not even a cygwin version of 2.8 available.
Or is there
another way to ge
Graham Percival wrote:
OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on
linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- can I assume
that anybody on windows would be using cygwin/bash ? Or is there
another way to get stdout and stderr in separate files on win
On 11-May-06, at 7:01 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:30, Graham Percival wrote:
Processing `bug.ly'
Parsing...(make-music
'SequentialMusic
Try redirecting stderr and stdout to different files:
lilypond bug.ly 2>err >out
and you'll understand why the current behaviou
Sorry, I mean \displayMusic, nothing else.
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote:
On 11-May-06, at 6:03 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I would start with the last example of current 11.1.6 (or some other
similar example(s)). Then, we can introduce the basics of how to
replace some of the embedded LilyPo
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:30, Graham Percival wrote:
> A simple example of \displayMusic produces:
>
> spark:~/tmp gperciva$ lilypond bug.ly
> GNU LilyPond 2.8.2
> Processing `bug.ly'
> Parsing...(make-music
>'SequentialMusic
>'elements
>(list (make-music
>'EventChord
>
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:22, Graham Percival wrote:
> From 11.1.2 Internal music representation
>
> C++ object: Each music object is represented by a C++ object. For
> technical reasons, different music objects may be represented by
> different C++ object types. For example, a note is Event
On 11-May-06, at 6:03 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I would start with the last example of current 11.1.6 (or some other
similar example(s)). Then, we can introduce the basics of how to
replace some of the embedded LilyPond code with Scheme code
to get more flexibility.
Good, that was my intentio
On 11-May-06, at 6:16 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
It's probably short for "respectively" and placed at the wrong place
in the sentence.
I don't know about Dutch, but in Swedish, we say something like
"A respektive B" where you in English say "A and B, respectively".
Thanks, fixed in CVS.
- Gra
11.2 Markup programmer interface
Markups are implemented as special Scheme functions. When applied with
as arguments an output definition (\layout or \paper), and a list of
properties and other arguments, produce a Stencil object.
* Markup construction in Scheme
* How markups work int
It's probably short for "respectively" and placed at the wrong place in
the sentence.
I don't know about Dutch, but in Swedish, we say something like
"A respektive B" where you in English say "A and B, respectively".
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote:
What does resp mean? I'm guessing something l
What does resp mean? I'm guessing something like "and"? Is it Dutch,
or Latin?
"One can not feed the #:line (resp #:center, #:column) command with a
variable ..."
"One should use the make-line-markup (resp., make-center-markup or
make-column-markup) function..."
This word certainly doesn't
I would start with the last example of current 11.1.6 (or some other
similar example(s)). Then, we can introduce the basics of how to
replace some of the embedded LilyPond code with Scheme code
to get more flexibility. This second step, of course, is an excellent
example of how to use \displaySche
In the current manual, define-music-function is introduced late in the
scheme chapter. I suspect that this is simply because
define-music-function is a more recent lilypond construct, and whoever
added it didn't want to disturb the existing material. Is that
correct?
I'm revising the chapte
Sorry, I didn't check this before sending the earlier message.
Parsing...{ a, cis e fis g }
=>
Parsing...
{ a, cis e fis g }
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-deve
A simple example of \displayMusic produces:
spark:~/tmp gperciva$ lilypond bug.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.8.2
Processing `bug.ly'
Parsing...(make-music
'SequentialMusic
'elements
(list (make-music
'EventChord
'elements
(list (make-music
...
IMO, it would be much nicer
From 11.1.2 Internal music representation
C++ object: Each music object is represented by a C++ object. For
technical reasons, different music objects may be represented by
different C++ object types. For example, a note is Event object, while
\grace creates a Grace_music object.
We expe
I produce tabloid booklets of my music (fold tabloid sheet in half to
get letter-sized pages). The method I use to produce them currently
does not work; it worked in 2.7.29. I'm not certain if any ps changes
went into 2.9 but not 2.8.2.
1) use lilypond-book to produce normal ps and pdf. (we
Joe Neeman schreef:
I'm trying to install the GUB 2.9.4-1 on gentoo linux (amd64, but with a bunch
of x86 compatibility libs). I get
$
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/joe/oldlilypond/usr/lib/ /home/joe/oldlilypond/usr/bin/lilypond
/home/joe/oldlilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.
37 matches
Mail list logo
