boot time, otherwise the device
would not mount at all. Why does the script behave differently at
boot time rather than afterwards?
Any ideas? I'm stumped.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
f enabling valgrind
support I would call it a severe bug in the build system if the
standard install procedure broke just because there was already an
older or differently configured version of the software installed on
the system. In other words, "install" should do what it
ng? Surely there is a way to get GRUB2 to do this.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
[1] I am paraphrasing from memory so it's not *exactly* correct but
the gist is right.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
really work and others suggest that it should
just work. Gaah!
Thanks for your help,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ant to do that?".
It seems that despite GRUB2's famous flexibility it just does not
support what I want to do and no-one expects that it should.
Thanks again for your help.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jeremy Henty wrote:
>
> > It's frustrating - I can only find explicit instructions for the
> > case where you chainload from one GRUB2 to a second GRUB2 on the
> > boot sector of a partition (ie. *not* on the MBR of another
> >
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Try:
>
> grub> linux (hd0,1)/grub/core.img
> grub> boot
After checking the GRUB help mailing list I find that you were
*almost* completely right. The command is "multiboot", not "linux".
Now it just works.
Thanks again
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:25:12 +0100
> Jeremy Henty wrote:
>
> > Fixed! I had to configure ghostscript-9.05 with --with-install-cups .
> > [...]
> > Perhaps this is worth mentioning on the BLFS Ghostscript page?
>
> Cups is an option
back but they fail to detect my internal SATA disks (which
surprises me - I thought SATA would just work).
So, what do people recommend for a modern Live CD to rescue/host LFS?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratc
Yasser Zamani wrote:
> I recommend Slax (http://www.slax.org/get_slax.php/);
Thanks, I'm downloading it. I like the way you can download a
customised version direct from the site. Neat!
Reagrds,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
F
ackage needed IP6 to pass
> tests. In addition, Slax has almost new GCC, GLibc, kernel and
> generally the toolchain by default!
It works very nicely. The kernel is 2.6.27.27 which is not nearly
new, but it is still new enough for LFS 7.1. Thanks for the tip!
Regards,
#x27;ll give it a go.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Yasser Zamani wrote:
> I recommend Slax (http://www.slax.org/get_slax.php/); I gracefully
> finished LFS with that as host.
I ran the verson check script in Slax and it could not find bison,
yacc or makeinfo. Did you customise slax with extra packages?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
etects my disks just fine. Many thanks for doing this!
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
after booting from a live CD? Or can I drop into the BIOS and
asssume that it lists the drives in hd0, hd1 ... order?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
s
still /dev/sda2 , but after booting grub on the disk reports the same
device map as before, namely hd0 -> /dev/sda . Surprising!
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
if eg. /dev/shm is in
memory but /tmp is not.)
Also, many audio/multimedia HOWTOs advise you to have /tmp in memory
but I haven't used such software in enough anger to see how useful
that is.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http:/
I juct checked the mirror sites listed at the bottom of
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/download.html and all of them lack
entries for the version 7.3 tarballs in their MD5SUMS and SHA1SUMS
files. I think this happened before.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jeremy Henty wrote:
> >
> > I juct checked the mirror sites listed at the bottom of
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/download.html and all of them
> > lack entries for the version 7.3 tarballs in their MD5SUMS and
> &
-6.8 .)
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On May 15, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>
> >
> >Quote:
> >
> > Changes to some distros cause the build of check-0.9.9 to fail in
> > Chapter 5. The proper fix is to add --with-sysroot to the end of
> >
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 19/05/2013 15:31, Jeremy Henty a écrit :
>
> > Sorry, I am confused. Do you mean I will be OK ignoring the erratum
> > or I will be OK if I follow it? And does "add --with-sysroot" mean
> > literally to add "--with-sys
ged? Does running "loadkeys" do anything useful
these days?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
The link "lfs-support Archives"
(http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/) in "lfs-support
Info Page" (http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support/)
returns "Page not found!".
Hang on, I guess that before I report this I should check the mailing
list archives ... **STACK L
ias | wc -l
38
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
t same results...
Just guessing, but I think a PAM misconfiguration can cause this.
Maybe you should check the contents of /etc/pam.d .
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:33:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 06/02/08 17:11:20, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> >
> > And have you told the Blender developers? If not then I certainly
> > will, since I think your fix is clearly the right thing to do.
>
> Wel
still responsible for handling sshd
connections. Even if I am wrong about inetd being the problem, it
certainly looks as though *something* is refusing to let go of port
22.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
atarcyrheb-sun16 .
I didn't touch anything outside /boot when I upgraded. Ages ago I
customised/etc/sysconfig/consoletoset KEYMAP="uk"and
FONT="lat1-14" , but that's the only change.
Any ideas?
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail
Just thought I'd add a title to my email! D'oh!
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 12:20:38PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>
> I upgraded my LFS 6.1.1 from 2.6.23 to 2.6.24 and now all 8-bit
> characters appear as a reverse-video question mark in the terminal.
> At least t
I guess just adding a call
to "unicode_stop" to the "console" bootscript will do the job?
Thanks for the tip,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Using /bin/echo produces the correct result.
Thanks everyone. I installed the LFS 6.3 console script, added
"ECHO=/bin/echo" near the beginning, rebooted and all is good!
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:16:38PM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2008 1:56 PM, Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks everyone. I installed the LFS 6.3 console script, added
> > "ECHO=/bin/echo" near the beginning, rebooted and all is good
lo-specific.
> If you have already built the system, i think /etc/console has
> default settings for the default font etc..
I set FONT="lat1-14" in /etc/sysconfig/console which gives me a few
extra lines.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:28:37AM -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Jeremy Henty wrote:
> >
> > Does VGA=... work on anything except lilo? I could never get it
> > to work under grub and every solution I Googled was lilo-specific.
>
> Works great in grub:
>
&g
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:05:41PM -0500, jasin wrote:
> Jeremy Henty wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, vga=xxx seems to be incompatible with setting
> > FONT=... in /etc/sysconfig/console ! The console spungs back into
> > the default VGA mode during the SysV
I just noticed that both my LFS 6.1 and 6.3 systems installed useful
executables such as vol_id into /lib/udev rather than anywhere in my
$PATH . This seems inappropriate, perhaps it should be changed?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:31:36PM -0300, Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr. wrote:
> Em Thursday 21 August 2008 14:51:12 Jeremy Henty escreveu:
> > I just noticed that both my LFS 6.1 and 6.3 systems installed
> > useful executables such as vol_id into /lib/udev rather than
>
I've noticed a change in the behaviour of useradd when upgrading LFS
from 6.1.1 to 6.3: "useradd foo" now creates a default group "foo" and
makes it the primary group of user "foo". It this meant to happen or
have I messed something up?
Replying to myself,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:07:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>
> I've noticed a change in the behaviour of useradd when upgrading LFS
> from 6.1.1 to 6.3: "useradd foo" now creates a default group "foo"
> and makes it the primary g
lon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+
I booted off the LFS live CD and built LFS on that. No problems.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ue to lacking the TICKET_CREATE privilege. Is that
intentional?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:58:59PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I've set some permissions for you, Jeremy, could you check them out
> ...
OK, I've created a new ticket now. Thanks very much!
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-s
utside reasonable range (496950512)
Should I be concerned about this? The host was under heavy load at
times during the run of the test set, so maybe that was the problem?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
onf and
friends unless you want to develop software.".
So, since creating an LFS system only requires building existing
software, why does it include the auto-tools? Could we not move them
to BLFS? What am I missing here?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list
Although I don't believe that there are any such
> changes in current LFS, there have been many in the past.
Ah! I didn't know that. That's an excellent reason for keeping them
in, even if they could be stripped out of the current LFS.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromsc
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:32:23PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jeremy Henty wrote these words on 02/27/09 18:18 CST:
> > What am I missing here?
>
> The 600 previous discussions about the same subject. Please
> reference the archives and you'll probably
#x27;t
> feel to bad about it!
Ah, so it is indeed my purpose to serve... as a warning to others!
:-)
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
the LFS site. Could you mention it in a new comment to the ticket?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
uot; hint though, I did the standard thing and built
on a separate partition.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 04:43:30PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 03:33:24PM +0100, Martin Ward wrote:
> > Jeremy Henty wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:37:13PM +0100, Martin Ward wrote:
> > >
> > >> think about it it migh
I use LFS 6.3. I also have an embryonic 6.4 system, but it looks as
though I should just scrap that and go straight to 6.5. Are there any
obvious issues with doing that or should it just work?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
ly to LFS 6.5 in a UTF locale
Are all/any of these feasible? The biggest problem I can see is
postgres, because the locale is hardwired into the server and it only
supports UTF in UTF locales. Any other gotchas?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
UTF-8 was pretty much the default now and the LFS 6.5 book
discusses UTF-8 locales without suggesting that they're particularly
troublesome, so I assumed it wouldn't involve too much pain. I'll
postpone thoughts of UTF-8 until LFS 6.5 is up and running.
Thanks for
config/console and
rebooting, or should I reinstall?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
22
CPU)
Failed 1/1462 test programs. 2/187534 subtests failed.
How can I investigate this further?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:46:45PM -0500, Shawn Eary wrote:
> baseh-3.2$ echo $PATH
> /toos/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
Is that really "/toos/bin" rather than "/tools/bin"?
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
or new /dev/sd*
devices. Hence, no access to my IDE drives or my CD. I Googled for
answers but found nothing definite, just lots of faff with no details.
I'd love some tips as to how to fix this: my core system is SATA but I
have some holiday snaps I'd like to see!
Regar
rfs stresses the
CPU much more than other file systems, which can lead to the bizarre
"kernel compiles crash on this file system and not on others" bug.
OK, I'm guessing, obviously, but it might be worth checking out.
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscrat
longer follow links by clicking on them; I have to use the keyboard
(up/down-arrow, Enter). Ya pays ya money and ya takes ya choice.
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above infor
what LFS is for, what it's like to build and run,
and why you might want to do it. It even made the point that "LFS is,
in the strict definition of the term, not a distribution.", which is
pretty insightful for this kind of drive-by review.
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfroms
ing slash on /mnt/lfs/ is important, don't leave it
out!)
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
to temporary directories and rsync
them. Now you *know* exactly what you're copying. Works for /
partitions too!
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi folks, I was wondering if any of you had tips on building an LFS
system for serious music/audio composing/editing work. I'll also be
pinging alsa-dev etc. for help but I'd appreciate your input too. I'm
a long-time happy LFS 4.1 user and I've already decided the next
system will be LFS 6.x co
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:34:19AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >Hi folks, I was wondering if any of you had tips on building an LFS
> >system for serious music/audio composing/editing work.
>
> You should also consult the wisdom at
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Good call! I'll be getting in to
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 06:02:16AM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Why boot off Knoppix when there's a livecd made just for building
> LFS?
No particular reason, just that I have Knoppix lying around already,
it's reckoned to be a good host platform for building LFS and I've
already used it for
been
implemented, or whether it's the reason for rsync's internal zlib
being different. Anyone know more?
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
out of it.)
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Thanks to everyone who educated me about 32/64-bit issues. I've been
having trouble finding the recommended 64-bit live CDs. I'm
bewildered if I can find Gentoo's, and the download link at
http://stockwith.co.uk/x86_64/> is broken. But I *have*
downloaded the Ubuntu Hoary Hedgehog AMD64 live CD
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:25:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I dunno if anybody has managed to build from a ubuntu live CD. The
> package versions should be ok, it's a question of whether they
> include all the necessary packages and headers.
Well, we'll see. I guess the good thing about Gento
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:30:45PM -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> Everybody loves topping "I did something even stupider" stories.
Well, if we're going to play *that* game - I once accidentally stapled
my thumbs together. Beat that!
Jeremy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blf
tc/gshadow with a copy of /KNOPPIX/etc/gshadow then
it's OK. (NB: I also ran " chown root:shadow /etc/gshadow ; chmod 640
/etc/gshadow " .)
Hope this helps. I've been a happy LFS 4.1 user for a few years now
and I'm looking forward to my new LFS 6.1.1 system!
Cheers,
J
when I succeed/fail.
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
[1]
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-support/2004-January/021572.html
[2]
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glibc/2001-05/msg00055.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glibc/2002-02/msg00070.html
http://www.mail-arch
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 09:59:56PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> >
> >I'm in Chapter 6.11.1 and the glibc test script gives me:
> >
> >make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
> >
>
> [gr
It's up! He LFS 6.1.1 .
I feel good!
I knew that I would!
Thanks to everyone who contributed to LFS!
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above inform
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:25:59AM -0700, Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:14:51AM +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> > Jeremy Henty wrote:
> > >
> > > It's up! He LFS 6.1.1 .
> >
> > Thanks for being so informative! Without thi
e this until now. I updated the kernel .config by running
"make oldconfig" and accepting the default answer to all questions.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
me.
YMMV of course, but this worked very well for me. BLFS includes links
and gpm.
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:08:36AM -0700, Paul G Rogers wrote:
> Sorry, thought [2.6.] was understood. IIRC the full name is
> patch-2.6.12-tar.bz2 from kernel.org, of course.
That's the diff between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 . Not want you want,
surely?
Regards,
Jeremy Hent
I run LFS-6.1.1 , upgraded to kernel-2.6.16.27 and udev-071 . Can I
upgrade to udev-096 using the LFS-6.2 instructions or will it break
horribly? I should disable hotplug as well, right?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:23:31PM -0700, Paul G Rogers wrote:
> >From: Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I run LFS-6.1.1 , upgraded to kernel-2.6.16.27 and udev-071 . Can
> >I upgrade to udev-096 using the LFS-6.2 instructions or will it
> >break
>
> I did
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 04:27:26PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/13/06, Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * I needed to run "make uninstall" in the udev-071 build tree
> > before installing udev-096. If you don't do that then something
> &
og-ng can, and the fact that someone went to the
trouble of creating syslog-ng says something, no?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:09:31AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:02:38PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > > Did you change anything in I2C settings in the new kernel
> &g
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:10:55PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 10/2/06, Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:49:22PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, is there any reason not to upgrade to Xorg-6.9.0?
> >
> &
I wrote:
> Does anyone know how to diagnose and fix XML catalogs?
OK, ignore this, I've just realised I have to install the DocBook XML.
I'll post again if I have problems. Sorry for the noise.
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-supp
As of "Fri Nov 17 16:27:38 GMT 2006":
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ returns a directory listing and
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ and
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ return pages saying "Page not
found".
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/
e \u:\w\$ as a
command. Change them to single quotes "'".
If you're not sure of the difference between single quotes, backquotes
and double quotes in shell scripts I recommend you spend a little time
studying it - it's very important and knowing it could save you a lot
of ti
88 matches
Mail list logo
