On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:10:49AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> In my build of 6.4-rc1, the box was hanging, apparently for more
>> than 10 minutes, in the gettext tests. Last thing in the log was
>> make[3]: Entering directory
>> `/building/gettex
On Nov 21, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Jens Stroebel wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've spent a couple of ours now tryng to get jhalfs (svn trunk) to
> build
> the LFS svn version. But I can't get it done.
>
> - I've built by hand a couple of times already (at the time of 6.3
> apprx.)
> - I've goo
On Dec 4, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've discovered another very small error in the kernel installation
> doc
> (chapter 8.3, in LFS 6.4).
>
> The line:
> "If the kernel source tree is going to be retained, run chown -R 0:0
> on the
> linux-2.6.27.4 directory to ensure a
On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:37 PM, William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > wrote:
>>> Hello Everybody,
>>>
>>> Is there any way to get some of the archives from the
On Dec 6, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Olaf wrote:
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> Part of the archives are currently disabled due to excessive
>> bandwidth
>> consumption. A robots.txt file was installed to prevent search
>> engines
>> from keep downloading all the archived messages all the time. There
>
On Dec 6, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> Or compress them. Maybe make them only available to subscribed
>> members. I wanted to grab the last two months of the blfs-support
>> mailing list archive.
>> Maybe someone can email me the files.
>
> Compressing is an option but would also
Enough!
If someone is going to borrow someone's work credit needs to be made.
I don't care the degree of the final product.
Impressing people cause of the work they claim they do without credit
to the author is worse
than throwing 3 strikes in a row at a bowling alley with Uncle
Knicknak's a
On Dec 6, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> William Harrington wrote:
>
>> It's a community endeavor and each project with it's own goal. Each
>> project
>> may borrow from another, and each project needs to give credit to
>> the source.
>
Hello guys,
The section has both this:
Prepare Zlib for compilation:
Prepare GMP for compilation:
-William
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Greg Schafer wrote:
>
> Sorry dude. You can't just blow back in here years after being MIA and
> expect folks to listen to your idle speculation. Folks will take
> notice
> when you have something concrete to offer i.e. well thought out,
> tested
> and published fo
st this, for the last few years:
sudo apt-get install build-essential m4 bison texinfo gawk && sudo
dpkg-reconfigure dash
Maybe this will help.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
d maybe even ieee-1275 for OLPC and
powerpc.
You can look at etc/make.conf in the grub source and look at the
expanded GRUB_PLATFORMS variable.
Sincerely
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ed at 2.12.2 ].
>
> Does that seem a worthwhile change to make ? (not tested in a clean
> build, only in an install_root build of glibc).
>
> ĸen
I saw that switch when 2.16 was released in the changes file:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00807.html
Sincerely,
W
headers are not installed at /tools/include/rpc. Glibc build will
get into a bad state due to the new rpc helpers that get cross-
compiled. We do not want this, so the following command will use the
internal rpc types header.
Note: You will not need this in ch6 glibc install.
Sincerely,
Wi
g using a 64 bit host and thus it
puts glibc/eglibc in a bad state and thus using internal rpc headers
is required when they are not available on the host. That's why I
suggested that earlier in the thread.
You will not encounter this when not cross compiling at all.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
all strip binaries do the same thing, though.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
.7 and glibc 2.16, along
with some other changes with packages. Especially with cross
compiling, i"ll be glad to help to give hints when people have issues.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
, you can use the switch to --
disable-login-utils and use shadow's su.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
include the linux kernel 3.4.x.
The link to the ISOs is here: http://cross-lfs.org/~kb0iic/livecdupd/
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
.g., coreutils (http://osdir.com/ml/bug-coreutils-gnu/2011-03/msg00074.html
)
So are you stating that umask needs to be set or not?
Very much appreciate all the good work of the project.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
ng.
Do not group linux as the kernel and OS with whatever you are trying
to tye
it to.
LFS is not linux
Debian is not linux
Fedora is not linux
Slackware is not linux
Linux is the OS. And for those of you who don't know what an OS is,
look at linux.
Sincerely,
William Har
and
home and whatever else.
A lot of book edits are going to occur cause of this. And in BLFS as
well.
If the usr merge is going to happen, just add systemd to core LFS
while you are at it.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
emd to core LFS
>> while you are at it.
> There's no need to be nasty.
>
That's not nasty. If you want to see nasty... look at your future book
edits.
Edits won't occur cause of package updates. Actually no updates would
be required
but you'll have u
local ?
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
eation for each disk in many
configurations.
On the other hand, when not changing anything, it's pretty static and
doesn't change.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
t LFS to
build. Maybe you are in over your head.
The frist problem is, you are using scripts, which you don't know how
to troubleshoot. Give me the money!
And I don't know why you'd want to reinvent the wheel to build LFS
it's already done in ALFS. Are people psycho?
Si
On Dec 2, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Wolf wrote:
> Glib-1.262 is only required to build Xfconf's Perl bindings; it is not
> required to build Xfconf.
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
http
erely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
@linuxfromscratch.org/2012-08/msg00408.html
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
linked fine. --strip-unneeded was smart enough
not to destroy the library
unlike --strip-all option.
There is already a thread about this which I recall from August:
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org/2012-08/msg00408.html
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://
ersion of
Xorg and all the libs and that jazz, but it all works fine for me with
newer hardware, it's just not taking advantage of the best stuff. But
really, when it comes to a livecd that made to work with building a
current LFS system, that's all it is meant for. Granted I can
On Mar 16, 2013, at 9:32 PM, William Harrington wrote:
the 7.2 LFS ppc
er 6.2 LFS ppc
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
t I get it between 1.2 and
2.5MB/s
Doesn't hurt to put it elsewhere.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
requirements.
Could update more, like to go kmod and e2fsprogs 1.42 or so but those
require newer glibc.
As of now, it is good as is. However, a completely new build may be
required once the host
system requirements are updated in the LFS book.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http
uld happen often, but I'm sure
plenty of people use livecd's as servers.
Changes are needed and I'm sure a newer and better livecd will be
issued to the world for building current and upcoming livecd's. I will
keep the updated livecd current as I use it and everyone is wel
On Mar 20, 2013, at 4:01 PM, William Harrington wrote:
building current and upcoming livecd's.
Er, LFS releases.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
near as elegant or flexible.
Hmm? If you are talking about the LFS livecd, it's from November
2007. Not sure which Arch cd you are talking about, but I'm sure it is
later than 2007.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http:/
maybe? I'd need
to go back to my logs.
Are there drivers specific to qemu for that?
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 20, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION=y
I think this is what the user was telling me about and I didn't have
it in the livecd's kernel config. I can fix it if this is the case.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma
On Mar 20, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
No, it's not set, but you wouldn't want to run a virtual system from a
livecd anyway. The client OS shouldn't need it.
Oh I see now, the option someone was mentioning was virtio.
Perhaps that is the issue.
Sincerely,
Wil
/opt/lib/
pkgconfig and /opt/share/pkgconfig
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 30, 2013, at 8:02 AM, William Harrington wrote:
Also, don't forget to make sure that your XORG_PREFIX is /opt and
XORG_CONFIG is set right and that PKG_CONFIG_PATH is set to /opt/lib/
pkgconfig and /opt/share/pkgconfig
oh and PATH includes /opt/bin and that man is looking into
r/lib/libprocps.so: symbolic
link to `../../lib/libprocps.so.1.1.1'
ldconfig -v outputs: libprocps.so.1 -> libprocps.so.1.1.1
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
that O3 aggressive inlining is the culprit.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
noted with this message, and referenced, I'm sure.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
/config.h
After executing ./configure --prefix=/usr and viewing lib/config.h
#define ENABLE_NLS 1 is already there. I noticed this when upgrading
bison for CLFS back at version 2.6.2.
There is no need to echo a definition if it is already set during the
configure process.
Sincerely,
William Har
On Apr 12, 2013, at 6:40 PM, William Harrington wrote:
echo '#define YYENABLE_NLS 1' >> lib/config.h
After executing ./configure --prefix=/usr and viewing lib/config.h
#define ENABLE_NLS 1 is already there. I noticed this when upgrading
bison for CLFS back at version 2.6.2.
On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm glad you figured this out. I was wondering about it because I'd
expect a compile error if two #defines for the same token were made
without an #undef in between.
-- Bruce
While we are on topic with Bison, it has come to my attention that
ed was too great
at the time.
We will let you know when they are available again. The server has
moved and things are still being sorted.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
t. !
Check for typos in your /etc/inputrc file.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
think the book list wants a load of email from everyone using the
script and being successful. I'm using php 5.4.12 with the http
extension enabled.
Very nice script.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
is improper after installing
Linux-PAM.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/shadow.html
The above page will give you a properly configured shadow using Linux-
PAM when followed precisely.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
S shadow page after installing linux-pam, those
get commented.
It's under the heading: Configuring Linux-PAM to Work with Shadow
Read carefully which options you want for shadow and what you should
be enabling or disabling.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
now, hehe.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
.18.0!
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On May 14, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I fixed that a couple of days ago.
-- Bruce
Is the script at http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/lfs-latest-files
reflecting your changes or do you copy the script after changes?
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http
rkill, but it is a good project!
There are lots of good things that are shared among the LFS community
that others can use.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
‘register_mutex’
/sources/blfs/mariadb-5.5.30/plugin/sql_errlog/sql_logger.cc:192:46:
error: ‘mutex_list’ was not declared in this scope
Otherwise I'd use it. It's been that way with each release. I'm tired
of debugging it.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscra
On May 15, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Fernando wrote:
> # cat /etc/lfs-release
> SVN-20130512
> 64bit, built with jhalfs
>
> I am worried about this:
>
> Either as normal user or as root:
> env LANG=C xzless
> /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/links-2.7-2013.05.15-17h21m20s.log.xz
>
> error message:
> /usr/
out. I know you want to deal with qemu with your build,
but I'd share this with the community.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
S, but there are knowledgeable
folks who build for ARM a lot and are at the CLFS and LFS mailing lists.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On May 31, 2013, at 8:20 PM, William Harrington wrote:
It isn't as easy
It isn't as easy than when building
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Still planned to start around 9:00 PM PDT (approx two hours after
sending this email).
Woohoo! Server upgrades!
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Looks pretty empty.
It probably still has some services not running like subversion! At
least I can't connect to the subversion server.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
On Jul 6, 2013, at 16:26, David Jensen wrote:
> Wouldn't be prudent in chapter 5 to set it to the running kernel, so
> there is less probability of a glitch in chroot. Chapter 6 may be OK.
What kind of glitch would be probable?
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfrom
re blob would be along the lines of "firmware_binary>" i.e. "radeon/R300_cp.bin" or "keyspan/mpr.fw"
So in the end the kernel puts "firmware/radeon/R300_cp.bin" "firmware/
keyspan/mpr.fw" into the kernel.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http:
i-6000-4.ucode'
CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR='/lib/firmware'
Another possibility that wasn't working are the permissions of the
firmware directory and or firmware file.
May want to check it is readable by the user which is building
configuring and building the kernel.
Sinc
Armin,
What steps do you take when creating the make 3.82 upstream fixes patch?
I've been browsing the gnu make site at savannah and tracking bugs,
and looking through their git log and am attempting to get latest fixes.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma
lib only and disable multilib in both binutils and gcc.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
e the form X.Y.Z and describes the smallest version of the Linux
kernel the generated library is expected to support. The higher the version
number is, the less compatibility code is added, and the faster the code gets.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/
the lfs livecd or using older hosts:
A prime example is here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.support/33291
The build will start failing when the tools start to link and run with
the glibc in /tools.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
keep upgrading, and yes, indeed the permissions are
as described by Ken.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
This will happen using certain optimizations. Which optimizations are
you using? Using default optimizations will not result in this issue.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
On Sep 1, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Klemen Košir wrote:
CFLAGS="-march=corei7 -Os -pipe"
Remove Os, restart the build from scratch and see if the error removes
itself.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
will arise when using -O3 or -Os.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
h -Os and -O3. It will not crop up with -O2 or -O1 or -
O0.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
been multiple posts at the lfs-support and lfs-dev mailing
lists about it.
Don't take optimizations lightly and know exactly what they do and
make sure that you are using them for the right reason. Not sure about
installing it on a USB drive is the proper reason for using O
r the jhalfs building, and this uses
gawk from LFS 6.3 which is 3.1.5. If I encounter I'll post here. Will
may need to update it on my end, as well.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscrib
On Sep 7, 2013, at 3:58 PM, William Harrington wrote:
I'm testing with the updated lfs livecd for the 7.4 release.
I know I need to update sudo for the jhalfs building, and this uses
gawk from LFS 6.3 which is 3.1.5. If I encounter I'll post here.
Will may need to update it on
On Sep 7, 2013, at 4:19 PM, William Harrington wrote:
Okay, I got past the glibc install and libstdc++ install and am on
binutils pass2. The target was for x86_64.
I updated gawk to 3.1.8 which was the problem above, no issue.
KERNEL <3.10.5> OK (Min v
e still lots of distros out there
using gawk < 4.0. Once again, I cannot replicate the problem with
multiple distros that use gawk 3.1.8 or earlier and in a vm.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ss-lfs.org/~kb0iic/livecdupd/
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Greetings,
Is the alfs-discuss active for discussion of jhalfs or is it
elsewhere? I have some additions to jhalfs I'd like to discuss.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
On Sep 11, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yes, but it has not been very active. The last post I see was in
July.
On the other hand, posting here would be a reasonable place too.
-- Bruce
Thanks, I will subscribe and get to discussing!
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http
t the header files from Linux (output below). I'm
going to go back to LFS which I had better luck with and try to pick
up
the parts from CFLS that I need to cross build.
CLFS has mailing lists you should as for support there.
http://trac.cross-lfs.org/wiki/lists#MailingLists
Sincerely
toolchain at the beginning.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Feb 5, 2006, at 12:16 PM, Dimitry Naldayev wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking for a way to build a clean production system. ie system
without development parts.
RATIONALE: I do not need binutils or gcc or something like this on my
router. (if I realy need binutils --- corect me please)
The main
On Feb 5, 2006, at 4:04 PM, William Harrington wrote:
2) Archive all your headers in an archive and compress it and save
them somewhere. Build a new toolchain except build it so it goes
into home that way when you extract the toolchain it'll always be
in home, or you could kee
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hello All,
In talking with Ryan Oliver, there seems to be one final thing that
we can do to our current build which will help stabilize it
completely: add 'make bootstrap' to the gcc build of chapter 6.
The benefits of this is that, afte
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 2/7/06, William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is my advice to those who think it takes too long... get 1GB to
2GB ram and build your sources in shared memory or get a faster
machine.
The American Way (TM) - Ther
Hello all,
A user mentioned having problems installing ncurses 5.5. It is
has the
same affect as not applying the patch. Is the patch missing from the
dev book?
The ChangeLog doesn't mention taking it out. Just curious if it was
ever in there.
./shlib: line 140: 21535 Segmentation fau
On Feb 13, 2006, at 8:28 AM, William Harrington wrote:
Hello all,
A user mentioned having problems installing ncurses 5.5. It is
has the
same affect as not applying the patch. Is the patch missing from
the dev book?
The ChangeLog doesn't mention taking it out. Just curious if i
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Maybe it's using the tic from your host system instead of the one it
just built. Maybe you could peruse the ./shlib script to see what's
happening. You could also try dropping --with-shared from the
configure line. This is how it's done in DI
Hello,
Finally was able to get around to getting this to work with my
SATA system.
edited include/linux/libata.h to #define ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI
and poof, after my dozen burns works great. I shall build
a system with it soon.
Future knowledge if no one knows:
In the past I have posted to
On Feb 21, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
GCC's configure script isn't like many other packages. All it does is
grab some initial information (machine type, etc) and caches the other
arguments you've passed it. The rest is actually processed when you
run
'make'. Watch it and you'll
Howdy folks,
Well the dreaded day has arrived and I shall be deployed
overseas. I will be active
march 2nd and should last around 416 days. Maybe who knows...
Later everyone! Don't fight while I'm gone. LFS don't kill people!
People kill people!
William Harri
Hello all,
Going through a SVN build: SVN 20070630
The old tarball still exists and is from 20070623
Just matching up conglomeration with the ChangeLog:
man-pages-2.60 not in conglomeration
less-406 is not in conglomeration
Libtool-1.5.24 is not in conglomeration
Tar-1.18 is not in conglomer
On Jul 12, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Jon Fullmer wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> Forgive a novice to this list. I couldn't find any mention of this,
> so if it's already been talked about, I'm sorry.
>
> Step 5.7 of the recent development book shows this step currently to
> generate the specs file:
>
> gcc -dump
Hello,
Anyone have the MAKEDEV-1.8.bz2 laying around in their archives?
I'd like to archive it. 1.7, too if it is around anywhere.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
On Jul 17, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm aware that this is perhaps a little off-topic for the -dev
> list, but
> I feel that this thread could really help future development of the
> CD,
> so please bear with me and help me out with as much feedback as you
> ca
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
