>I've encountered him online and conversed with him, on several
>occasions. Interestingly, his tone on the times he thought I was male
>was discernably different from the times he thought I was female
It's always funny to see how people treat you subtly differently depending
on what gender the
>I've encountered him online and conversed with him, on several
>occasions. Interestingly, his tone on the times he thought I was male
>was discernably different from the times he thought I was female
It's always funny to see how people treat you subtly differently depending
on what gender they
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Jenn V. wrote:
> srl wrote:
>
> > Or "if you're really loyal to this company, you'll work 70 hours a
> > week," which IMO is a far more common statement and gets aimed
> > equally at everyone when it's used.
>
> I got 'well, you're not married and you don't have children...
srl, [EMAIL PROTECTED], said:
> what would you suggest as an alternative? why do you think people
> work on open source?
I have a vision of a game/social environment/storytelling medium
where I can create my own reality, populate it with interesting
things and bots, and open it up for people to
srl wrote:
> Or "if you're really loyal to this company, you'll work 70 hours a
> week," which IMO is a far more common statement and gets aimed
> equally at everyone when it's used.
I got 'well, you're not married and you don't have children...'
for that one.
Jenn V.
--
"We're repairing th
Snarfblat wrote:
>
> There was an interesting discussion brought up in this thread
> that made me wonder...
>
> At what point is flirting / sexual attraction / et all perceived
> as sexism? What factors indicate whether it is more towards a
> sexist annoyance, or an uninvited advance...
I perc
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Jenn V. wrote:
> > "Jenn V." wrote:
> >
> > > 2. Power.
> > > If one party has power over the other - financial, managerial,
> > > uni-results, force of personality - then it becomes terribly,
> > > terribly awkward for the one without power.
>
> Force of personality is MEA
Alexander Sendzimir wrote:
>
> "Jenn V." wrote:
>
> > 2. Power.
> > If one party has power over the other - financial, managerial,
> > uni-results, force of personality - then it becomes terribly,
> > terribly awkward for the one without power.
>
> What do you mean by "force of personality".
"Jenn V." wrote:
> 2. Power.
> If one party has power over the other - financial, managerial,
> uni-results, force of personality - then it becomes terribly,
> terribly awkward for the one without power.
What do you mean by "force of personality". This sounds terribly general. We're all
persona
http://download.sourceforge.net/linuxchix-faqs/issues.html
I've quoted the URL for the HTMLised version of the FAQ, rather
than the main FAQ.
Please note that the internal links are broken, my docbook
stylesheet for HTML doesn't seem to understand relative links.
I spologise for that.
Jenn V
Snarfblat wrote:
>
> There was an interesting discussion brought up in this thread
> that made me wonder...
>
> At what point is flirting / sexual attraction / et all perceived
> as sexism?
There's a couple of factors which - to me - differentiate between
flirtation and it not being FUN anymo
There was an interesting discussion brought up in this thread
that made me wonder...
At what point is flirting / sexual attraction / et all perceived
as sexism? What factors indicate whether it is more towards a
sexist annoyance, or an uninvited advance...
Is the fact that social advances are tr
Alexander Sendzimir babbled:
:> ...(and at that age we all know what that usually means)...
:
:Actually, we--being male in this instance--don't.
I actually had a very unusual experience growing up.
I am female, yet I was one of the guys. Not as in the stereo typical
sense that you see in movie
13 matches
Mail list logo
