echoed to bit.listserv.*, but you should always reply to
the list rather than to the news group if you want your post to be seen by all
subscribers.
These are some, but by no means all, of the lists hosted on listserv:
IBM-MAIN
ISPF-L
JES2-L
MVS-OE
MVS-UTIL
RACF-L
TSO-REXX
--
Shmuel (Seymour J
I believe that he's using a different meaning of client, e.g., customer.
IND$FILE, SFTP and WSA are all easier to use for people who are not at home
with the Eunix utilities.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Main
No; you get the extents as allocated, not as requested. Then there's the EAV
issue.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dm
> Used to be the custom.
"No, No, No, it ain't me Babe. I'm not the one you're thinking of."
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
Keep in mind that COBOL came from the short range committee at CODASYL; it was
never intended to be around for more than a few years.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
committee, with COBOL coming from
the former.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John McKown
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 4:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Jean Samme
My PC editor has TS and TF. Alas, it is abandonware.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I would take out a large life insurance policy before doing something like
that. My colleagues would kill me, and I couldn't blame them.
I will admit to having used AMASPZAP, but only as a last resort and with the
assistance of a zapmaker program.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
I'm using office365 and lookout from a web browser, and I don't know what
they're doing. Given that it's m$, they're probably not doing what they should
be. Still, I wouldn't expect even m to capriciously insert NBSP, although their
it smarts quotes are almost
gt;He wrote back, "What's this 'BLKSIZEa44'?"
If there's one thing worse than the QP doll it's interpreting the text as QP
when the header says otherwise.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Ma
> You can readily disable smart quotes.
In which m$ applications? How?
I'm using the web interface to office365, and haven't checked whether it's
messing with quotes.
"test"
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> That is precisely what "smart quotes" is all about.
That's why I hate them.
BTW, how do I turn off half-smart quotes on the computer of someone who's
sending me a document?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
uments.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 6:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Breaking text file at position 72?
>
> Friday, 14 December 2018, will be my last day at IBM.
I'll miss you, but I can't claim that you haven't aid your dues. Thanks for the
time you put in here.
> metalworking
Isn't forgery illegal ?
> that can use an active volunteer
IBM-MAIN
--
Shmuel (Seymour
Well, it's George Mason University, but I don't know how much control they have.
If you can zip one of the broken messages and e-mail it to be, I'll try to pin
down what's going on. Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
I have no problem with 7z, but using an extension for the wrong format is sick.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.
Like many other questions, the answer depends on which processor you're asking
about and what options have been set.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Mar
n archive to someone else then I'll ask him what formats he
can handle, although it's hard to find someone that can't handle zip.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Pau
I would expect the pragma to affect the call, not the fetch.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 12:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
What is he smoking? Since when was the 1401 a mainframe?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mark Regan
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2018 8:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Escalate. Have your boss tell the hardware vendor that he will not renew the
contract if they are not willing to support the hardware.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Nightwatch
That page was written in the 21st century, decades after the 1401 was dead.
Back in the day, I never heard the 1401 referred to as anything other than a
small computer or "tinkertoy".
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
r. That might have involved an IBM 1401,
More likely a UNIVAC 1005.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2018 11:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
Redbooks are useful, but they are not formal documentation.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
George Kozakos
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
research the
acceptability of z/OS Unix System Service (*NOT* USS!) to the *ix community and
the effect of that on z sales.
With regard to whether z/OS is UNIX, I must reluctantly agree that it is,
albeit without many of the facilities that the community expects.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
If you want to pick nits, read "Z-80" as "S-100 PC using a Z-80"; it's not a
mainframe, nor is the 1401.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Wayne B
Look at the date on that; it's revisionist history. You won't find any
contemporaneous documents referring to the 1401 as a mainframe.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
I never mentioned the Altos; you did.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Wayne Bickerdike
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 3:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How about
Well, I started on a 650, but I once saw a post here from Werner Buchholz; you
don't get much old timer than that.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
scott Ford
Sent: F
What are "GDDM graphics"? GDDM supports two very different 3270 for graphics.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Dave Jones
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 1:02 PM
To
PGF is software that uses GDDM; the 3270 graphics protocols are APA and PSS.
APA came in with the IBM 3270 Personal Computer (3270-PC) and PSS came in with
the 3278 and 3279.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
what
I was doing; I almost never ran with one big panel.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Robert Prins
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Well, at one time I expected
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Open_Systems_Interconnection_Profile
(GOSIP) to displace SNA, but the Feds went TCP/IP despite the mandate and that
was all she wrote.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
time? I'm not sure. But dumb enough - no question.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mark Regan
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sub
What do you do when you can't see where the cursor is in order to move it where
want it? Hitting home and then moving it back near where it was isn't nearly as
nice as having the crosshairs. To say nothing of lining up text.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.e
IMHO, if you don't have the source code then that in itself is a good reason to
get rid of the exit, carefully.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Brennan
Sent: F
Well, at some point peripheral vision becomes an issue; my guess is that 43"
would be okay but that 72" would be too big. I never saw the point of dual
monitors, except for cases where drivers weren't available for a single monitor
with the same real estate.
--
Shmuel (Seymou
Toggling it on and off is fine, and I normally didn't use the crosshair cursor,
but it was a lifesaver when I needed it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Roger Bolan
I would have loved to see an enhanced SNA with internetworking and DNS, but
when CCITT refused to look at it, that wasn't an option.
If the major TCP-based protocols at least switched to SCTP, that would be an
improvement.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~s
delete it.
What is SAVE14F? I hope it's not in your save area.
Have you verified that every place you use WAIT ECB=MY_ECB you don't need an
ECB list?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussio
Have they started wearing boots and bonnets in England instead of installing
them in their cars?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Smith
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2019 8
J. D. Salinger?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 7:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Zowe?
Stepping aside from what
No, it's not that simple. You have given no reason to believe that control is
not given to the main task. Fix your code to delete the CIB and then report on
what happens.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Main
If the code you posted is the code that you're running then I wouldn't expect a
WTO; I would expect a CPU bound loop, and I already told you what your bug is.
Until you fix it, there's no point in further discussion.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.
Surely local non-SNS 3270 displays can be used for both console and TSO
terminals. I wonder about OSA, though.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Richards, Robert B
REXX write only? I beg to differ. Yes, it has a few quirks, but I find it
eminently readable.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 3:19
Usually such ABEND codes have a reason in R15 and a message in the job log.
Please include those when you ask for help.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Wayne Bickerdike
Sent
e
multitasking issue)
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:42 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
>REXX write only? I beg to differ. Yes, it has a few quirks, but I find it
>eminently readable.
Indeed. It's English-like and about as readable as any programming language
gets. Unless Tony meant "Beca
It's not enough to know the language; if the programmer doesn't include the
necessary comments to provide context then you're in trouble.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on b
ms?
Perfectly reasonable if you're used to a language with bit or Boolean data
types.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listse
a complicate program in some other language
instead of a simple program in assembler?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
David Crayford
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM
The address after F: might actually be necessary; the address before return,
not so much.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-r
Source for pretty much everything; some products were source only.
OTOH, I don't believe that there was source available for COREZAP or DELINK0.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on beha
AFAIK you can get a patent on a process.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Matt Hogstrom
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 9:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe
> Z/OS back in the pre-OCO SP3.8 days
WTF is "SP3.8". I might believe OS/VS2 Release 3.8, or MVS/SP V3 (MVS/ESA),
there was no SP version with 8 releases.
> was “open source” if you call fiche open source.
There were optional source material tapes.
--
Shmuel (Seymo
#x27;re probably not ready for.
For program objects, the format is proprietary and you will need an NDA plus
big bucks.
If it were me I'd use IEBCOPY for load modules and program objects rather than
RYO.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
There is no " MVS/SP 3.8". They say that the memory is the second thing to go.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Matt Hogstrom
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:28 PM
To
"You can write Fortran in any language."
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 6:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
S
e above or size below, but not
both.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Crawford, Robert C. <01feadb2c2d2-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019
Don't even think of using fields like CVTUSER and TCBUSER unless there is some
way to be sure that nobody else is or ever will be using them. BTDT,GTS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
It might shrink or expand. I would expect the nucleus to expand if you add more
engines to your LPAR, or if hardware related control blocks expand. Whether
that actuall reduces the size of the private area would depend on whether you
cross a boundary.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http
ugh I would rather have had a PL/S compiler.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Zowe
No. The Devil is in the details.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 9:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Concurrent
lex symbols, but I doubt it. Certainly a stuatue
ov Gracie is overdue, but the author doesn't begin to do her credit for her
many accomplishments.
> developer of COBOL
What is the rest of the CODASYL short range committee, chopped liver?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
ht
l but some are more equal than others.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Concurrent S
> How about mathematic symbols or mnemonics as opposed to human readable
> languages?
I find Mathematics much more readable than, e.g., German, Russian. Neither the
vocabulary nor the grammar is as complex as any natural language I know of.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.g
t;> From: Joseph Reichman > <mailto:reichman...@gmail.com> >
>> Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 3:45 PM
>> To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' > <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >
>> Subject: RE: Concurrent Server Task Dispatch issue mult
AFAIK, a PSW key of 0 in MVS will allow waiting on an ECB of any key, but I can
think of reasons to disallow it. I wouldn't even try to guess for z/VSE.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
Actually, C was deigned to compile on a PDP-7; despite being used frequently
for the purpose, it's really not particularly suited for writing operating
systems. But, of course, even Fortran can, and has, be used for the purpose if
you're perverse enough.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
more of a hindrance than a help; lures you
into expecting PL/I behavior in cases where the semantics are very different.
Don't forget SELECT, which came from PL/I and helps to make code more readable.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
___
Keep in mind that wiki is a mixed bag; its emphasis of secondary sources over
primary sources tends to damage its reliability. Also, the URL you gave was for
PL/I rather than for REXX.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
A lot of the syntax comes from PL/I, although not the use of a continuation
character and not the use of labels (no, signal is not a goto.)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul
See the DATA and DATA PROMPT commands in z/OS TSO/E CLISTs Version2 Release3,
SA32-0978-30,
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3sa320978/$file/ikjb800_v2r3.pdf
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> secure-web is offensive
If I had some way to turn it off, or to jail the guy that thought it was a good
idea, ...
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmar
issue)
Hi R'Shmuel,
"... signal is not a goto ..." ?!
It is also true that Signal has other operands, but, in its most basic
form it is EXACTLY a goto.
Regards,
David
On 2019-01-11 15:32, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> A lot of the syntax comes from PL/I, although not the use of a continu
Block structure. Use of /* and */ as comments delimiters. Use of : for labels.
But they're still very different.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Smith
Sent: Thu
> It's there, and other implementations of Rexx, such as Regina, struggle to
> emulate it.
All implementations of REXX provide a stack, but none of them even try to
provide the stack mechanisms that TSO has and CLIST DATA/DATA PROMPT support.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://ma
The point is that signal does both more and less than a PL/I goto and maximally
violates the law of least astonishment. It's one of the pitfalls I warn about
in my Safe REXX papers.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From
t certainly use it that way, but I find that a good screwdriver
makes a bad hammer, and vice versa.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...
That's one option.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 8:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASCRE init module (again)
Argh! Why did the need to introduce a new keyword instead of just using
REGION=(below,above)?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Marchant <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-r
Given the size of PoOps, perhaps an RFE for a separate manual containing well
commented examples for all of the complex instructions, including sort.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
ciple applies to asking 3rd party vendor about potential
compatibility issues; it can only help, and not doing so can hurt.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: S
encapsulate any
tricky optimization of frequently used functions in centralized macros, again
well documented.
Don't C, COBOL and PL/I all use the same compiler back end these days?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From
IBM never upgraded TSO/E for the REXX standard. I see nothing in z/OS TSO/E
REXX Reference Version2 Release3, SA32-0972-30 about built-in variables TRUE
and FALSE.
More important, IMHO, is that IBM did not add the ANSI extensions to ADDRESS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu
That depends on how you feel about Russian Roulette. I agree that "In most
cases, that just isn't a problem. ", but that's not much comfort in the rare
cases where it is a problem and you failed to check. Remember, even paranoids
have real enemies. But it's not my do
r PL/S any day.
BTW, problems with C have been discussed here many times over the years. I'm
not going to rehash old threads.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
David Crayford
This list has more readers and RACF-L has more concentrated expertise. If it
were me, I'd post the question in both.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bob
Bridges
Sent: Wedn
You use LMMFIND to retrieve statistics. See z/OS ISPF Services Guide Version 2
Release 3. SC19-3626-30.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, January
brag about. We had 2 Mib at the Technion in
1973, and I'm sure that places like NASA Goddard had more, to say nothing of
the tri-ASP 195 complex at Suiteland and the intelligence facilities in
Maryland and Virginia.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://m
ANSI-compliant Rexx (sic).
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:56 PM
To: IBM-M
And even when they weren't supported you had the paddle project.
BTW, by 1978 there was 3rd party memory on the market. There was even block
multiplexor channel for the 360/65, from a company called CIG.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~s
The 370/168 had UP models ranging from 1 MiB to 8 MiB. Double that for MP.
The Amdahl 470V/6 was available in 1 MiB through 8 MiB.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Marchant
That site seems to be having problems.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TS1160
't have that facility. OS/2 uses
RXQUEUE and pipes for capturing command output, e.g.
'DIR FOO.* | RXQUEUE'
Will put the file list in the stem associated with the active queue.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Fr
a new tab
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Edward Finnell <000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 6:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
One obvious use is for coroutines.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 8:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
I've used the CC bits but never the ILC bits.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John Gateley
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 7:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: BAL
INE that do GET from SYSTSIN
and PUT to SYSTSPRT, never the TSO command. See z/OS TSO/E Programming Service
Version 2 Release 3, SA32-0973-30, "Using the TSO/E I/O service routines for
terminal I/O" on p. 189.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
The problem seems to be specific to m$ Edge, or perhaps Edge and IE.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Edward Finnell <000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
1 - 100 of 6360 matches
Mail list logo
