I don't recall ever seeing built-in variables TRUUE and FALSE, but I haven't read the standard.
http://www.rexxla.org/rexxlang/standards/ has ordering information and links. At $125, I'd just go for the draft, but it's probably worth it if you're trying to implement ANSI-compliant Rexx (sic). -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Unreadable code (Was: Concurrent Server Task Dispatch issue multitasking issue) On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:57:28 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >IBM never upgraded TSO/E for the REXX standard. I see nothing in z/OS TSO/E >REXX Reference Version2 Release3, SA32-0972-30 about built-in variables TRUE >and FALSE. > Are these variables (like RC)? Can the programmer assign to them? (Consider compatibility.) >More important, IMHO, is that IBM did not add the ANSI extensions to ADDRESS. > Where can I get the ANSI standard? Would I have to pay for it? (Years ago I had a harcopy of a draft. Semantics were explained in pseudo-Rexx.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
