On 5/23/14, 11:49 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 21/05/14 17:58, Matt Claypotch wrote:
# Audience
The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
all Mozillians. The goal is to have as lightweight a barrier to viewing and
participating in the meeting as possible. The off
On 21/05/14 17:58, Matt Claypotch wrote:
> # Audience
>
> The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
> all Mozillians. The goal is to have as lightweight a barrier to viewing and
> participating in the meeting as possible. The official definition of the
> intended aud
On 2014-05-23, 12:54 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
I meant to say: "In general I find time spend in meetings is usually
**un**productive time, so I avoid meetings.
There's a line that a few weeks of hard work can save you an hour or two
of research, and that's even more true of project coordinati
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Chris Pearce wrote:
>>
>> I make the exception for the internal MoCo+MoFo Staff
>> meeting, which I sometimes watch on Air.mo and *always* read Matt Brubeck's
>> *excellent* notes.
>
> mbrubeck's notes
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Chris Pearce wrote:
>
> I make the exception for the internal MoCo+MoFo Staff
> meeting, which I sometimes watch on Air.mo and *always* read Matt Brubeck's
> *excellent* notes.
mbrubeck's notes are awesome.
If a meeting doesn't have recorded output -- be it minut
On 5/23/2014 4:50 PM, Chris Pearce wrote:
In general I find time spend in meetings is usually productive time,
so I avoid meetings.
I meant to say: "In general I find time spend in meetings is usually
**un**productive time, so I avoid meetings. "
;)
__
On 5/23/2014 6:10 AM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 5/22/14, 5:54 AM, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
Til,
I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and value this
is good to know - makes me redact my previous statement. I’d love to
see data about how many folks like you are out there - while
On May 22, 2014, at 5:19 AM, curtis.koe...@gmail.com wrote:
> Honestly, I am not a big fan of this change. The fact that we have an open
> and public meeting is what I think helps us build community. People can tune
> in and take a casual look at what we're up to. Find things they might be
> i
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:58:34 PM UTC-4, Matt Claypotch wrote:
>
> # Audience
>
>
>
> The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
>
> all Mozillians. The goal is to have as lightweight a barrier to viewing and
>
> participating in the meeting as possible. The
On May 22, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Christie Koehler wrote:
> Could we also use this change as an opportunity to advertise other
> channels that are public, but specific to particular projects? E.g. "Our
> project-wide meeting is no longer totally public, but here are public
> meetings you can atten
Thank you, Potch, for working on this and sharing it with us.
I have mixed feelings about this proposal.
On one hand, I like that we have a fully open, public meeting
that those who are interested in Mozilla can attend.
On the other hand, I recognize the accessibility issues present with the
cu
On 5/22/14, 5:54 AM, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
Til,
I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and value this is good
to know - makes me redact my previous statement. I’d love to see data about how
many folks like you are out there - while other sources have not shown me that
the pro
No, I don't think so, but I would imagine an edited highlight reel from the
meeting would get a lot more views than simply a video of the whole
meeting. When I miss meetings I never have an extra hour lying around to
watch a video just in case something happened that I want to see.
On Thu, May 22
Message-
> From: governance
> [mailto:governance-bounces+mconnor=mozilla@lists.mozilla.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Till Schneidereit
> Sent: May 22, 2014 9:32 AM
> To: Larissa Shapiro
> Cc: mdougl...@mozilla.com; mitch...@mozilla.com; Michael Kelly; Matt
> Claypotch; cbe...@moz
There are topics we are not permitted to discuss in a fully public forum
but can share with any self-identifying Mozilla community member. The goal
is to strike a balance between opening up information beyond staff-only
meetings and ease of access for interested parties. I'm trying to figure
out w
ro
Cc: mdougl...@mozilla.com; mitch...@mozilla.com; Michael Kelly; Matt
Claypotch; cbe...@mozilla.com; governance@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Evolving the Mozilla Project Meeting
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Larissa Shapiro
wrote:
Til,
I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and va
tch; cbe...@mozilla.com; governance@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Evolving the Mozilla Project Meeting
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Larissa Shapiro
wrote:
> Til,
>
> I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and value this
> is good to know - makes me redact my previous s
Mike Hoye schrieb:
the project call happens around dinner time for Europeans
As a note, when I was only a casual contributor, times like that made
meetings ideal to follow for me here in Europe as I would not be in
other stuff like university or such. I don't clearly remember if that
meeting
On 2014-05-22, 10:54 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-05-22, 9:32 AM, Till Schneidereit wrote:
I didn't actually watch the call all that often. I did read the notes
almost always, though. Hence my suggestion that we might continue
publishing the notes, with an explanation that they might be sli
On 2014-05-22, 9:32 AM, Till Schneidereit wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
Til,
I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and value this is
good to know - makes me redact my previous statement. I’d love to see data
about how many folks like you are ou
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
> Til,
>
> I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and value this is
> good to know - makes me redact my previous statement. I’d love to see data
> about how many folks like you are out there - while other sources have not
> sh
Til,
I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and value this is good
to know - makes me redact my previous statement. I’d love to see data about how
many folks like you are out there - while other sources have not shown me that
the project call was a strong connection point for ne
I would argue that the Project Call, while it has always been…. passively open
(as in one *could* join) has not bee, during my time here, actively transparent
(as in easy for a total novice to the project to navigate and gain value from)
so I am not sure this is a big loss. I feel like the ways
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Michael Kelly wrote:
> On 5/21/14 12:58 PM, Matt Claypotch wrote:
> > # Audience
> >
> > The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
> > all Mozillians. The goal is to have as lightweight a barrier to viewing
> and
> > participating in
On 5/22/14 2:12 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Matt Claypotch schrieb:
# Audience
The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
all Mozillians.
Doesn't that feel like we are moving to being less open?
Yes and no to me. It feels like we're more open to folks we know. We'
Matt Claypotch schrieb:
# Audience
The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
all Mozillians.
Doesn't that feel like we are moving to being less open?
# Timing
Right now the meeting is scheduled at 11:00am Mountain View time (PST/PDT).
This is simultaneously t
On 5/21/14 12:58 PM, Matt Claypotch wrote:
> # Audience
>
> The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
> all Mozillians. The goal is to have as lightweight a barrier to viewing and
> participating in the meeting as possible. The official definition of the
> intended a
Here's the Yammer thread for additional discussion:
https://www.yammer.com/mozillians/#/Threads/show?threadId=39975
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Matt Claypotch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been mulling over ways we can improve upon and evolve the venerable
> Monday Mozilla Project Meeting f
28 matches
Mail list logo
