I would argue that the Project Call, while it has always been…. passively open (as in one *could* join) has not bee, during my time here, actively transparent (as in easy for a total novice to the project to navigate and gain value from) so I am not sure this is a big loss. I feel like the ways to reach people we don’t know at all are diffeent. > > Yes and no to me. It feels like we're more open to folks we know. We're > harder to reach for folks we don't know yet. > > Wondering two things: > > Can we add data here on how many people view each of the meetings in the last > N weeks (since the internal meeting is open to mozillians) ? > > Also, could we have a post-edited video published that either bleeps, or cuts > out non-public parts for asynchronous consumption? Or maybe a moderated > "summary" version that doesn't feel that much like censorship? > > The latter could offer a pathway for folks that are interested, but not sure > if that's what they want to join. > > I approve of getting this data, and I see the value in this approach if the data supports spending energy…. I do not however, based on my work as the lead of the pathways WG and a member of the community building team, have a strong sense or any anecdotal evidence that new people join through the project call today.
Larissa _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
