No, I don't think so, but I would imagine an edited highlight reel from the meeting would get a lot more views than simply a video of the whole meeting. When I miss meetings I never have an extra hour lying around to watch a video just in case something happened that I want to see.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Larissa Shapiro <lshap...@mozilla.com>wrote: > I would argue that the Project Call, while it has always been…. passively > open (as in one *could* join) has not bee, during my time here, actively > transparent (as in easy for a total novice to the project to navigate and > gain value from) so I am not sure this is a big loss. I feel like the ways > to reach people we don’t know at all are diffeent. > > > > Yes and no to me. It feels like we're more open to folks we know. We're > harder to reach for folks we don't know yet. > > > > Wondering two things: > > > > Can we add data here on how many people view each of the meetings in the > last N weeks (since the internal meeting is open to mozillians) ? > > > > Also, could we have a post-edited video published that either bleeps, or > cuts out non-public parts for asynchronous consumption? Or maybe a > moderated "summary" version that doesn't feel that much like censorship? > > > > The latter could offer a pathway for folks that are interested, but not > sure if that's what they want to join. > > > > > I approve of getting this data, and I see the value in this approach if > the data supports spending energy…. I do not however, based on my work as > the lead of the pathways WG and a member of the community building team, > have a strong sense or any anecdotal evidence that new people join through > the project call today. > > Larissa > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
