xudong963 commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948528835
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/enforce_sorting/mod.rs:
##
@@ -373,9 +373,10 @@ pub fn ensure_sorting(
return adjust_window_sort_removal(requiremen
xudong963 commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948526926
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -1943,6 +1943,30 @@ async fn test_remove_unnecessary_spm1() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
xudong963 commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948524638
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -1943,6 +1943,30 @@ async fn test_remove_unnecessary_spm1() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
Noah-FetchRewards opened a new issue, #1178:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1178
Referencing
https://datafusion.apache.org/ballista/user-guide/deployment/kubernetes.html
When running
`docker pull ghcr.io/apache/datafusion-ballista-standalone:0.12.0-rc4`
UBarney opened a new pull request, #14567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14567
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14053 .
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
If both col_min and col_max match
ctsk opened a new issue, #14565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14565
The current implementation of GroupOrderingPartial updates its internal
state by converting any incoming batch into the row format, and then traversing
that format to determine if the sort key changed.
ctsk commented on issue #14565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14565#issuecomment-2646608996
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
ctsk opened a new pull request, #14566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14566
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14565.
## Rationale for this change
Faster is better?
## What changes are included in this PR?
#
clflushopt commented on issue #3843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3843#issuecomment-2646640247
@alamb quick question what's considered higher priority here between better
join ordering approach (potentially like DuckDB's) vs picking up the couple
tickets left in the EPIC
jayzhan211 commented on issue #14380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14380#issuecomment-2646820171
> > Hmm, my immediate thought here is that if we cannot guarantee correctly
coerced inputs during the first pass, then it's probably not worth attempting
to coerce in the bui
jayzhan211 commented on issue #14380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14380#issuecomment-2646822350
> That could potentially unlock removing Expr::Wildcard. It's not really an
expression (just like Expr::Alias isn't
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1468 and Sort
adriangb commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2646833158
> when I save a table to csv, it will also save rowid into csv. no system
will do like this.
My problem is with this statement. I don't think there's a universal
definition a
logan-keede commented on issue #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/123#issuecomment-2646559348
> In case anyone is curious -- we support correlated versions of these
queries (via a join) but if there is no correlation (not super useful) we do not
>
> ❯ create ta
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1948299765
##
datafusion/common/src/utils/mod.rs:
##
@@ -602,26 +602,46 @@ pub fn base_type(data_type: &DataType) -> DataType {
///
/// let data_type =
DataType::List(A
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #13404: feat: Add implicit casting to
`TypeSignature::String`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13404
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
xudong963 commented on issue #14536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14536#issuecomment-2646775055
> [@xudong963](https://github.com/xudong963) maybe we should make the error
message better?
Yes, this is a good point
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
Noah-FetchRewards commented on issue #1179:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1179#issuecomment-2646854039
Another error:
./dev/build-set-env.sh: line 21: cargo: command not found
[+] Building 0.0s (0/0)
Noah-FetchRewards opened a new issue, #1179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1179
I'm running the build image command for kuberentes using the documentation
at: https://datafusion.apache.org/ballista/user-guide/deployment/kubernetes.html
Using:
`git clone
chenkovsky commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2646850170
> > when I save a table to csv, it will also save rowid into csv. no system
will do like this.
>
> My problem is with this statement. I don't think there's a universal
defi
Noah-FetchRewards commented on issue #1179:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1179#issuecomment-2646856304
Just realizing, that the new docker pull command is found at:
docker pull ghcr.io/apache/arrow-ballista-standalone:43.0.0-rc2
Found this shoveling
xudong963 opened a new pull request, #14568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14568
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
It's clear that `fetch` will miss after removing SPM
## What changes are in
xudong963 closed pull request #14568: Fix: limit is missing after removing SPM
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14568
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #14550:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14550#issuecomment-2646894154
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
xudong963 opened a new pull request, #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569
## Rationale for this change
It's clear that fetch will miss after removing SPM
## What changes are included in this PR?
If SPM is with fetch, we won't remove it.
xudong963 opened a new pull request, #14570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14570
Just code 🧹
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
dhegberg commented on issue #13570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13570#issuecomment-2647102910
I've started to put together some basic documentation for prepared
statements, but when generating examples I'm struggling to use named parameters.
Using `SessionContext:
ozankabak commented on issue #14549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14549#issuecomment-2647105941
Extended tests are still failing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948494619
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -1943,6 +1943,30 @@ async fn test_remove_unnecessary_spm1() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
zhuqi-lucas opened a new pull request, #14572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14572
## Which issue does this PR close?
Describe the bug
In, https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14394, it was reported that
while attempting to implement a DataSink different sch
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948492572
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -1943,6 +1943,30 @@ async fn test_remove_unnecessary_spm1() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
Weijun-H commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2646145904
> Impressive work! I got a suggestion and a high-level question:
>
> ### Suggestion
> I think to justify this change, we have to make sure:
>
> * No performance regre
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948051074
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -431,6 +463,35 @@ impl TypeSignature {
}
}
+fn get_possible_types_from_signature_classes(
Review Comm
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948051074
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -431,6 +463,35 @@ impl TypeSignature {
}
}
+fn get_possible_types_from_signature_classes(
Review Comm
berkaysynnada commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2646154037
> * No performance regression (benchmarks already showed)
> * Reduce memory footprint, for queries which batch can accumulate in
`RepartitionExec` (as the origin issue said)
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948051074
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -431,6 +463,35 @@ impl TypeSignature {
}
}
+fn get_possible_types_from_signature_classes(
Review Comm
milenkovicm commented on PR #1173:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1173#issuecomment-2646611454
when you get chance it would be great if we could release ver.44 @andygrove.
please merge #1171, #1175 before ver.44 release.
thanks a lot on your help !
--
This
Lordworms commented on issue #14552:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14552#issuecomment-2646572272
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
rkrishn7 commented on code in PR #14538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14538#discussion_r1948419349
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/union_by_name.slt:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor
rkrishn7 commented on code in PR #14538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14538#discussion_r1948419729
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/union_by_name.slt:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Review Comment:
Mo
chenkovsky commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2646922625
> > when I save a table to csv, it will also save rowid into csv. no system
will do like this.
>
> My problem is with this statement. I don't think there's a universal
defi
iffyio merged PR #1719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1719
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
milenkovicm closed pull request #1003: feat: replace simple with complex UDF
implementation
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1003
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Dandandan commented on PR #14539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14539#issuecomment-2646565220
seeing some regressions in imdb benchmark
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
goldmedal commented on issue #14380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14380#issuecomment-2646780333
> Since `exprlist_to_fields` is called in the builder, it seems that
wildcard expansion still hasn't been delayed.
>
I see. I think we can revert the change
https://gith
chenkovsky commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2646781160
> > if a system/metadata column is not selected in project, after project,
in spark system/metadata column's still a valid system/metadata column, but
it's not that in #14362
>
matthewmturner commented on issue #14536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14536#issuecomment-2646783166
I had the impression (although perhaps it is dated) that datafusion sought
to be compatible with postgres to the extent reasonable. Assuming thats still
the case is ther
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1948299517
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -227,25 +226,13 @@ impl Display for TypeSignatureClass {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd,
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1948299517
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -227,25 +226,13 @@ impl Display for TypeSignatureClass {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd,
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14057#issuecomment-2646732851
> if a system/metadata column is not selected in project, after project, in
spark system/metadata column's still a valid system/metadata column, but it's
not that in https://githu
xudong963 merged PR #14570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14570
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
alamb commented on code in PR #14555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14555#discussion_r1948063270
##
datafusion/core/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ array_expressions = ["nested_expressions"]
# Used to enable the avro format
avro = ["apache-avro", "num-traits"
alamb closed issue #13836: Why does `PruningPredicate` reference a `row_count`
for each column?
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13836
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948058156
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -460,6 +521,44 @@ fn get_data_types(native_type: &NativeType) ->
Vec {
}
}
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Eq
alamb commented on code in PR #14558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14558#discussion_r1948061227
##
datafusion/common/src/scalar/mod.rs:
##
@@ -974,6 +974,129 @@ impl ScalarValue {
)
}
+/// Create a Null instance of ScalarValue for this datat
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#issuecomment-2646195392
> but it would also be useful to be able to use the wildcard in the
return_type function as well.
Using TypeSignatureClass:Timestamp can represent wildcard of timestamp.
De
timsaucer opened a new issue, #1017:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1017
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
Suppose someone wants to build a library that is usable by both rust and
python
Dandandan commented on PR #14539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14539#issuecomment-2646347055
This is ready for review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
ugoa commented on issue #14434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14434#issuecomment-2646349335
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
timsaucer opened a new issue, #14562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14562
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
By adding the foreign function interface to this project, we exposed a host
of features to end users. It allows for easy integrat
2010YOUY01 commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2646218873
> Hi @2010YOUY01. I'd like to thank you firstly for this investigation. I
actually expect higher memory consumption—especially in systems where the
upstream part of the Repartitio
alamb commented on PR #14521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14521#issuecomment-2646172628
I merged up from main to resolve a conflict with this branch
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
alamb commented on code in PR #14561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14561#discussion_r1948062976
##
datafusion/proto/src/bytes/mod.rs:
##
@@ -199,11 +199,7 @@ pub fn logical_plan_to_bytes(plan: &LogicalPlan) ->
Result {
#[cfg(feature = "json")]
pub fn logical
alamb closed issue #14560: Update proto to support to/from json with an
extension codec
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14560
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
alamb merged PR #14561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14561
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948062578
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -209,14 +210,13 @@ impl TypeSignature {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Eq, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Hash)]
pub enum Ty
alamb commented on PR #14295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14295#issuecomment-2646174704
I merge this PR up from main locally and ran the tests again to be sure and
everything looks good. Thanks @adriangb ❤️
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
berkaysynnada commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2646294361
> The point is: I think there should be no memory-bloat issue in
TPCH/clickbench queries caused by `RepartitionExec`, just wondering do you have
any bad query can reproduce the
Dandandan commented on PR #14539:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14539#issuecomment-2646327023
Update after implementing emitting in batch size: in memory performs about
the same as before, but tpch_10 regressed compared to earlier implementation
(so seems more having to wit
joocer opened a new pull request, #1719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1719
The logic for if a dialect supports `MATCH() AGAINST()` was coded into the
parser to look for specific dialects rather than the dialects attesting they
support the syntax. This meant th
alamb merged PR #14559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14559
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2646174275
Close/reopent o start CI
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
alamb closed pull request #14544: Test all examples from library-user-guide &
user-guide docs
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
alamb merged PR #14295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14295
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
peter-toth commented on PR #13046:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13046#issuecomment-2646358282
@andygrove , I've updated the PR from `main`.
Please note that the new `EliminateCommonPhysicalSubexprs` rule is not part
of the default `PhysicalOptimizer` as the rule has no u
Weijun-H commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2646358808
I believe we cannot use the customized channel `DistributionReceiver`
currently, as `OnDemandRepartitionExec` can prevent channels from filling up
endlessly. Additionally, I noticed
2010YOUY01 commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2646119135
Impressive work! I got a suggestion and a high-level question:
### Suggestion
I think to justify this change, we have to make sure:
- No performance regression (benchma
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948037292
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -431,6 +463,35 @@ impl TypeSignature {
}
}
+fn get_possible_types_from_signature_classes(
+signatu
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948036125
##
datafusion/common/src/types/builtin.rs:
##
@@ -47,3 +49,11 @@ singleton!(LOGICAL_FLOAT64, logical_float64, Float64);
singleton!(LOGICAL_DATE, logical_date,
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1948036125
##
datafusion/common/src/types/builtin.rs:
##
@@ -47,3 +49,11 @@ singleton!(LOGICAL_FLOAT64, logical_float64, Float64);
singleton!(LOGICAL_DATE, logical_date,
milenkovicm opened a new pull request, #1177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1177
# Which issue does this PR close?
Depends on: #1176
Closes #1164.
# Rationale for this change
Add support for insert into `INSERT INTO`
# What changes ar
Omega359 opened a new pull request, #14564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14564
... or lack thereof
## Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #14563
## Rationale for this change
Benchmark showcasing the issue.
## What changes are included
Spaarsh commented on issue #14303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14303#issuecomment-2646433642
I this comment here (though erroneous) explains that this is the expected
behavior of the optimizer:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/9c12919786be0cfce5c4817101a
Spaarsh commented on issue #5600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5600#issuecomment-2646416918
I began contributing to this repo only from a month ago so please pardon an
errs from my side, but I just wanted to suggest something.
Since we're planning of having a sepa
Omega359 commented on PR #14367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14367#issuecomment-2646418656
While I can see opportunities for improvements in the code I think they are
relatively minor and this PR is suitable for inclusion in DF. Thanks!
@alamb
--
This is an aut
Omega359 opened a new issue, #14563:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14563
### Describe the bug
Dataframe functions `.with_column` and `.with_column_renamed` (and possibly
others) are slow. One can really see this in dataframe's with many many columns
where a .with_c
jatin510 commented on code in PR #14530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14530#discussion_r1948219182
##
datafusion/proto/proto/datafusion.proto:
##
@@ -798,6 +799,19 @@ message UnnestExecNode {
UnnestOptions options = 5;
}
+message MemoryExecNode {
Review
Spaarsh commented on issue #1017:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1017#issuecomment-2646548490
@timsaucer so if I understood this correctly, we are trying to either create
an ```FFI_UDF``` that is capable of ingesting different types of UDF or, we
create an FFI for
timsaucer commented on issue #1017:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1017#issuecomment-2646550034
@Spaarsh I’m thinking the latter. I should have a draft PR for the scalar
variant in the next few days to demonstrate.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
logan-keede commented on PR #14306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14306#issuecomment-2646553608
@Rachelint this is just a reminder. Please disregard if this isn't needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Spaarsh commented on issue #1017:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1017#issuecomment-2646557713
@timsaucer okay! If no one is doing this already, I will try and understand
how it can be done for Aggregator or Window UDFs. Though I am unclear of the
approach, I am goi
90 matches
Mail list logo
