On Tuesday 12 December 2006 03:17, Remy Blank wrote:
> I've had something similar, where DPMS would work initially, and switch
> the screen off after the configured timeout, then switch on again for no
> apparent reason after a few minutes and stay on.
>
> What I could find out is that xorg connect
Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:29:34 +0300, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ryan Sims wrote:
> )
>>
>> That paste looks HTML. Can someone confirm that it is sending as text
>> only? I have Seamonkey set up to send text only to this list.
>
> This is a multi-part message i
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:29:34 +0300, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ryan Sims wrote:
)
That paste looks HTML. Can someone confirm that it is sending as text
only? I have Seamonkey set up to send text only to this list.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format, that is, onepart is plain
On 13 December 2006 22:20, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:11:32 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > I once found an HTML version of that man page that is slightly easier
> > to browse. Unfortunately, I don't remember the URL - probably somewhere
> > on their web site.
>
> "man:mplayer" if yo
On 13 December 2006 21:34, Leandro Melo de Sales wrote:
> Era o que eu ia te dizer agora! :p Eu tive esse mesmo problema. Se liga, é
> tu que outro dia encontrei aqui na lista e que faz computação na UFCG?
You are most probably right. ;-)
Uwe
--
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a Ge
Ryan Sims wrote:
> I noticed while updating to Gnome 2.16 today that gnome2-user-docs
> took a long time (38 min +), and most of that time was spend on
> versions of the documents in languages I don't speak. After trying a
> few things, I found that disabling the nls use flag in scrollkeeper
> red
I noticed while updating to Gnome 2.16 today that gnome2-user-docs
took a long time (38 min +), and most of that time was spend on
versions of the documents in languages I don't speak. After trying a
few things, I found that disabling the nls use flag in scrollkeeper
reduced the gnome2-user-docs
[SNIP]
Hmm... If you put ~media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0 in both package.mask and
package.keywords then you will find that ~media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0 cannot be
installed because it is "masked by: package.mask". Hence I would say that
package.mask takes precedence over package.keywords... I suppose what you
wanted
On Thursday 14 December 2006 00:36, Travis Osterman wrote:
> > > I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
> > > /etc/portage/package.keywords as "media-tv/ivtv". Now I'd like to
> > > have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the newer
> > > version is required as a dependency of
Hemmann, Volker Armin tu-clausthal.de> writes:
:
> > > > This is a very new mobo: MSI K9A platium, with dual pci-e slots
It was the bios. Updating the bios to version 1.21 beta fixed the
problems witht the sata drive, cdrom and ethernet controllers.
Selecting K8 as the architecture was the rig
I'd like to throw NTop in the mix.
http://www.ntop.org/overview.html
Not quite what you were looking for, but i think it will be close enough
that you shouldn't mind the differences. And its in portage.:)
bryce
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Several years ago I saw a (unfortunatly windows) progr
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:55:52 -0800, Jason Ausmus wrote:
> > the latest ivtv branch (irregardless of whether its marked
> > stable).
>
>
>
> Sorry, but "irregardless" != English word
>
> I'm not trying to deputize myself as a grammar police officer, but I'm
> powerless to resist this one..
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Dibb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:14 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting a package in package.keywords?
>
> Travis Osterman wrote:
> Technically, you're going
> to be best
On 12/13/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 22:59, Travis Osterman wrote:
> I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
> /etc/portage/package.keywords as "media-tv/ivtv". Now I'd like to
> have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:46:40 -0500, Travis Osterman wrote:
> Excellent, I put both "=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r1" and
> "=media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0" in my package.keywords and now I can emerge
> world without worry.
You are probably better off with "~sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.19"
which will
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 19:43, Douglas Linford wrote:
> iDeq ~ # emerge -pv \>app-portage/eix-0.7
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild R ] app-portage/eix-0.8.3 USE="sqlite" 0 kB
Hmm.. that's weird! Tried to remerge it?
#
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 22:59, Travis Osterman wrote:
> I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
> /etc/portage/package.keywords as "media-tv/ivtv". Now I'd like to
> have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the newer
> version is required as a dependency of some other pro
If you wanted to do something like that, and make all 0.9.x versions
"stable" in package.keywords, then you would add this:
=media-tv/ivtv-0.9*
But if you just want to stick with 0.9.0, then what you had before is
correct.
=media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0
Excellent, I put both "=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Travis Osterman wrote:
I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
/etc/portage/package.keywords as "media-tv/ivtv". Now I'd like to
have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the newer
version is required as a dependency of some other program.
I thought that putting "=media-tv/iv
I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
/etc/portage/package.keywords as "media-tv/ivtv". Now I'd like to
have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the newer
version is required as a dependency of some other program.
I thought that putting "=media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0" (where 0.9.0 i
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 13:46, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 13 December 2006 17:38, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
> > i tried this, but still doesn't work
> >
> > modules=("ifconfig")
>
> Why do you insist on ifconfig? /etc/conf.d/net.example clearly indicates
> that "iproute2" is the default - for good rea
Michael Sullivan:
> Is there a way to add something to the boot-up process that's not
> in /etc/init.d? I thought I remembered something from Red Hat
> like /etc/rc.local, but I can't remember...
Look at /etc/conf.d/local.start. Which is run by /etc/init.d/local.
Sergio
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.or
Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Is there a way to add something to the boot-up process that's not
> in /etc/init.d? I thought I remembered something from Red Hat
> like /etc/rc.local, but I can't remember...
>
>
Adding the relevant command to
/etc/conf.d/local.start should do what you want
there is
Is there a way to add something to the boot-up process that's not
in /etc/init.d? I thought I remembered something from Red Hat
like /etc/rc.local, but I can't remember...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:17:52 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> PS: Please don't toppost.
>
> --
> Bo Andresen
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:11:32 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> I once found an HTML version of that man page that is slightly easier
> to browse. Unfortunately, I don't remember the URL - probably somewhere
> on their web site.
"man:mplayer" if you use konqueror :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Room service? Send
Era o que eu ia te dizer agora! :p Eu tive esse mesmo problema. Se liga, é
tu que outro dia encontrei aqui na lista e que faz computação na UFCG?
2006/12/13, Felipe Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 12/13/06, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13 December 2006 17:38, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
Hi,
This is when you place your reply ABOVE the message you are replying
about. So what I am doing right now is an example of topposting. The
reason why this is bad practice is that to understand what I am
talking about, you need to scroll to the bottom of the post and work
your way UP, which is
On 12/13/06, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 December 2006 17:38, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
> i tried this, but still doesn't work
>
> modules=("ifconfig")
Why do you insist on ifconfig? /etc/conf.d/net.example clearly indicates
that "iproute2" is the default - for good reason.
> config
On 13 December 2006 17:38, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
> i tried this, but still doesn't work
>
> modules=("ifconfig")
Why do you insist on ifconfig? /etc/conf.d/net.example clearly indicates
that "iproute2" is the default - for good reason.
> config_eth0=("192.168.254.2")
Try:
config_eth0=( "192.1
On 13 December 2006 18:02, Grant wrote:
> I seem to have 6 agetty processes running on my system, but I'm the
> only one who ever logs into my server. How can I reduce the number of
> running agetty processes?
Those are the getties sitting on your virtual consoles F1 - F6 and let you log
in on t
iDeq ~ # emerge -pv \>app-portage/eix-0.7
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] app-portage/eix-0.8.3 USE="sqlite" 0 kB
And what do you mean, "Please don't toppost"?
On 12/13/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On
On 13 December 2006 15:56, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 06:25, maxim wexler wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> > I note the mplayer man page is 6700 lines long. Is
> > there something out there less cumbersome? $info
> > mplayer is the same.
>
> Not that I'm aware of. Maybe google...
On 12/13/06, Felipe Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/13/06, Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 00:47, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > On 12 December 2006 23:15, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
> > > Did they change anything on how you configure your static ip address?
> >
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 08:29, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Media container formats (was Re: [OT] Specifying
file size in dvd::rip)':
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:57, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
A quick comparison can
I'm using madwifi-ng and a couple weeks ago master mode stopped
working. It does still works with madwifi-old. I believe the problem
started when I did an emerge world on 11/30. These are the packages
that were updated:
libpaper
cups
foomatic
foomatic-db
foomatic-filters
foomatic-filters-ppds
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 08:29, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Media container formats (was Re: [OT] Specifying
file size in dvd::rip)':
> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:57, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > A quick comparison can be found at
> > http://en.wikipedi
> I seem to have 6 agetty processes running on my system, but I'm the
> only one who ever logs into my server. How can I reduce the number of
> running agetty processes?
Edit /etc/inittab as needed. Keep in mind that you will lose the ability
to CTRL+Fn and log on to the VTs controlled by the ag
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:15, Douglas Linford wrote:
[SNIP]
> > Show the output of:
> >
> > # emerge -pv \>app-portage/eix-0.7
>
> iDeq ~ # emerge -pv\ > app-portage/eix-0.7
> bash: app-portage/eix-0.7: No such file or directory
You really should copy and paste such a command. The space was
[ebuild R ] app-portage/eix-0.8.3
On 12/13/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:17:30 +, Douglas Linford wrote:
> iDeq ~ # /usr/bin/update-eix-remote update
> bash: /usr/bin/update-eix-remote: No such file or directory
Which version of eix do you have instal
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:17:30 +, Douglas Linford wrote:
> iDeq ~ # /usr/bin/update-eix-remote update
> bash: /usr/bin/update-eix-remote: No such file or directory
Which version of eix do you have installed?
--
Neil Bothwick
Amoebit: Amoeba/rabbit cross; it can multiply and divide at the sa
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:02, Grant wrote:
> I seem to have 6 agetty processes running on my system, but I'm the
> only one who ever logs into my server. How can I reduce the number of
> running agetty processes?
Edit /etc/inittab as needed. Keep in mind that you will lose the ability
to
I seem to have 6 agetty processes running on my system, but I'm the
only one who ever logs into my server. How can I reduce the number of
running agetty processes?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:20, Douglas Linford wrote:
> iDeq ~ # qlist eix | grep remote
> iDeq ~ # /usr/bin/update-eix-remote
> bash: /usr/bin/update-eix-remote: No such file or directory
> iDeq ~ # which update-eix-remote
> which: no update-eix-remote in
> (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/u
On 12/13/06, Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 00:47, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 12 December 2006 23:15, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
> > Did they change anything on how you configure your static ip address?
> > I've updated my system today and connot access the internet
iDeq ~ # qlist eix | grep remote
iDeq ~ # /usr/bin/update-eix-remote
bash: /usr/bin/update-eix-remote: No such file or directory
iDeq ~ # which update-eix-remote
which: no update-eix-remote in
(/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.1
iDeq ~ # /usr/bin/update-eix-remote update
bash: /usr/bin/update-eix-remote: No such file or directory
On 12/13/06, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:32, Douglas Linford wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> I have added the eix functionallity to my system by doing the
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 00:47, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 12 December 2006 23:15, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
> > Did they change anything on how you configure your static ip address?
> > I've updated my system today and connot access the internet anymore,
> > when using my static ip address, just dhcp.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:32:50 +, Douglas Linford wrote:
> When I run the last command, it returns: bash: update-eix-remote:
> command not found
> And when I do: slocate update-eix-remote, nothing is found.
Which version of eix? I have it here
$ qlist eix | grep remote
/usr/bin/update-eix-remo
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:32, Douglas Linford wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> I have added the eix functionallity to my system by doing the
> following:
>
> 1. iDeq ~# echo app-portage/eix >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
> 2. iDeq ~# emerge eix
> 3. iDeq ~# update-eix
> 4. iDeq ~# update-eix-remote
> I'd like to use the MinSpareServers and MaxSpareServers directives in
> httpd.conf. Does anyone know how to enable prefork?
MPM prefork is statically compiled into the Apache httpd binary:
$ /usr/sbin/apache2 -l
Compiled in modules:
core.c
prefork.c < mpm prefork
http_core.c
mod_
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 15:32, Douglas Linford wrote:
> I have added the eix functionallity to my system by doing the following:
>
> 1. iDeq ~# echo app-portage/eix >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
> 2. iDeq ~# emerge eix
> 3. iDeq ~# update-eix
> 4. iDeq ~# update-eix-remote update
>
> When
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Linford wrote:
> 1. iDeq ~# echo app-portage/eix >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
> 2. iDeq ~# emerge eix
> 3. iDeq ~# update-eix
> 4. iDeq ~# update-eix-remote update
Shouldn't the last one be... "eix-sync" ?
- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman -
Good Day,
I have added the eix functionallity to my system by doing the following:
1. iDeq ~# echo app-portage/eix >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
2. iDeq ~# emerge eix
3. iDeq ~# update-eix
4. iDeq ~# update-eix-remote update
When I run the last command, it returns: bash: update-eix-remote: c
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:57, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 December 2006 16:57, Thomas Rösner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]
>
> Specifying file size in dvd::rip':
> > Then there are containers: mp2 (only mpeg2), mp4 (only mpeg4), avi
> > (anything
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 06:25, maxim wexler wrote:
[SNIP]
> I note the mplayer man page is 6700 lines long. Is
> there something out there less cumbersome? $info
> mplayer is the same.
Not that I'm aware of. Maybe google... You do know that you can search through
the man page, right? If not
2006/12/13, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> 2006/12/12, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> --
>> Neil Bothwick
>>
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>> A: Top-posting.
>> Q: What is the most an
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 16:57, Thomas Rösner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]
Specifying file size in dvd::rip':
> Then there are containers: mp2 (only mpeg2), mp4 (only mpeg4), avi
> (anything, but limited), ogg (anything), mkv (anything and more, not in
> DVD::Rip las
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:30:55 -0500, Ryan Sims wrote:
> > As a cordless mouse has no tail, should we call it a hamster? ;-)
> I like it. What about trackballs?
A trackball is an oversixed, upside down[1] mouse, so I'd call it a dead
rat... except that sounds too much like a Linux distro :)
[1]
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Bira wrote:
On 12/13/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Ryan Sims wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a cordless mouse has no tail, should we call it a hamster? ;-)
>
> I like it. What about trackballs
On 12/13/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Ryan Sims wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As a cordless mouse has no tail, should we call it a hamster? ;-)
>
> I like it. What about trackballs?
>
Gremlins?
Tribbles?
--
Bira
http:/
Ralf Stephan wrote:
Hello,
I have a stable (+unstable gtk) i86/xorg soundless installation
with a bare bones xfce4 desktop. My only problem is that, after
one two weeks, the xfce-panel disappears and newly started apps
are missing the window decorations. They keep missing, even if
I restart the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:37:41 +, Mick wrote:
> Don't forget that there may be a cultural issue too - netiquette has
> been established in a language which is read from left to right, not
> top to bottom.
English is read left-to-right AND top-to-bottom.
--
Neil Bothwick
Angular Momentum Mak
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 22:57, Thomas Rösner wrote:
> Without going into too much detail, that's something different. XviD is
> a dialect of MPEG-4. H.264 is a different, newer standard. MPEG-2 is yet
> another standard used on DVD's (=ooold ;-)). Hardware players can do
> MPEG-2, some can do
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 06:12, Dale wrote:
> Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> > 2006/12/12, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> --
> >> Neil Bothwick
> >>
> >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> >> A: Top-posting.
> >>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:41:11 +0800, Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> > PS: Please do not top-post.
> I'm sorry but what does "top-post" means?
Keep reading, but you didn't do it this time :)
> >
> > --
> > Neil Bothwick
> >
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: W
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Ryan Sims wrote:
On 12/12/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a cordless mouse has no tail, should we call it a hamster? ;-)
I like it. What about trackballs?
Gremlins?
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 12 December 2006 23:15, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
> Did they change anything on how you configure your static ip address?
> I've updated my system today and connot access the internet anymore,
> when using my static ip address, just dhcp.
>
> I used to use my /etc/conf.d/net like this:
>
> config_et
On 13 December 2006 01:08, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:09:00 -0300 Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> > > > > I believe that if I load piix first (the PATA driver for Intel
>
69 matches
Mail list logo
