On 12/29/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2005, at 10:03 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >>
> >> Example: last apachecon, Geir was trying to update geronimo.html, it
> >> took 30+ mins before asking for help. It took me 15+ minutes to
> >> f
On 12/29/05, Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:12:52PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> >...
> > If people have issues with Forrest, then please take them
> > to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. It is totally unfair
> > to a new project to just criticise it from af
I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys
listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical
KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't even know the ldap-driven one was
around. I assume its fair for projects to just point to the
p.a.o/keys/groups/${project}.asc file nowa
+1
--tim
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much
> thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look
> forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and feedback!
>
> Here's a l
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 September 2013 02:31, Tim Williams wrote:
>> I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys
>> listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical
>> KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't eve
Moving this[1] to general@
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:55 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Tim Williams wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>> I've included references inline for your convenience. I'll once again
>> [strongly] suggest you guys remove that a
ge the policy to
state that anywhere in the artifact is acceptable.
--tim
[1] - http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> I have no doubt that Chukwa will be happy to help resolve this in
> whatever way is necessary to satisfy all the ASF policy's, but we
> don't need
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Gagan Juneja wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone with the necessary karma please add me to the Incubator UNIX
> group so that I can finalize the release/site for project Blur? I'm the
> release manager and commiter on the project.
Hey Gagan,
Looks like you are a membe
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
>> 2 x +1 binding votes
>> 2 x +1 non-binding votes
>
> Aren't IPMC votes binding so that would be 4 +1 binding votes?
Hi Justin,
Apache Blur isn't under the [new] alternate process, if that's what
you're referring to. I'm still under
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi
>
>> Apache Blur isn't under the [new] alternate process, if that's what
>> you're referring to. I'm still under that impression [as one of the
>> mentors] that we require 3 binding IPMC votes.
>
> I may be mistaken but I thought it requi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> It requires 3 +1 votes on the podling list, they then bring it here
>> for the 3+1 *binding* votes. In our case we got 4 total +1 {2 IPMC
>> members; 2 PPMC members} and came here for the third binding vote. I
>> think the Aaron wa
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> This is conflicting from what the site said about governance of podling.
> PPMC is a part of podling and responsible to manage the podling on behalf
> of IPMC.
>
> I suppose you meant that their votes do not bind but saying it was never
> pa
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Seriously, give me a break.
>
> This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure
> to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the
> monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been fulfilled.
The in
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I can give the IPMC a hand here, if my point is too obscure. A policy
>>> might look like this:
>>>
>>> Resolved: An Apache pro
is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old
page[1] just has a link to "next month" but I'm interested in knowing
*this* month.
Thanks,
--tim
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
-
To unsu
Drats, found it as soon as i hit send...
http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt
--tim
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
> is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old
> page[1] just has a link to "next month" but I'm interest
Hi Jukka,
You'll need to add Blur to these rotations I reckon
Thanks,
--tim
On Saturday, September 8, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With apologies for the lateness, here are the shepherd assignments for
> this month:
>
> Benson Margulies - Cordova, Flex, S4
> Dave Fisher - Am
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> 2: While I appreciate that mentors are not entirely fungible, I tend
> to think in terms of a limited pool of volunteer effort, so indefinite
> incubation worries me.
It's their decision to volunteer their efforts in that way so I don't
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> First of several reminders:
>
> For podlings reporting in December, we'd like *all* mentors to sign
> off on the reports. I hope to use this to get a clearer picture of
> where we have mentor weaknesses.
>
> General note: if you are a PPMC
fyi, Blur just finished their monthly reporting obligation. I
miscalculated where we'd end up when I set it up initially and we
should be in group 2 vs. group 3. I've updated podlings.xml, I'll
remove us from December, if anyone knows anywhere else needing updated
let me know...
--tim
On Mon, De
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>> I really don't object, but when the podling has graduated, they don't
>>> have such a reminder.
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>>> FWIW, I feel the same. I'd rather see 'did not report' and let the
>>>
Hmm... is that the right reporting group?
http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt
Thanks,
--tim
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> btw: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2013
> On Dec 29, 2012 6:42 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 2
On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote:
> Author: grobmeier
> Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013
> New Revision: 1441762
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762&view=rev
> Log:
> updated status page for onami
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/onami.xml
>
> Modified: i
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Discussions on Ross' and Chris' proposals ground to a halt.
>
> In my view, there are real issues that drove those discussions, even if
> those discussions drove some of us to distraction.
>
> A bit before the wiki crashed, I wrote:
>
> htt
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> There was a consensus to add the Champion role, and we haven't even
> tried it seriously, and now you propose to eliminate it. That doesn't
> seem reasonable to me. I'd rather try to make it useful and then
> evaluate it. In other words,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> ...
> Podlings would be required to have a minimum of two active mentors. A mentor
> is free to become inactive but must explicitly
> state this else the mentor risks being removed for not performing their
> duties.
I like it all. A lot.
+1
--tim
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>
> So far I've heard +1s from the following folks, so no need for them
> to
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or o
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I respectfully suggest your intervention is an example of ISSUE 03 (too
> many cooks). As a champion I'm interested in podlings learning the Apache
> Way - a significant part of this is to not let unnecessary process get in
> the way of softwa
Why not take it from the number Clutch reports?
On Monday, July 8, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greets,
>
> For our report, I'd like to supply an official count of podlings under
> incubation. Here's one way of doing it from the incubator svn checkout:
>
> grep . content/report_due_* | wc -l
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
>
> The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
> (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
>
> The earlier discuss
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> We would like to propose Mesos as an incubator proposal.
+1, best wishes...
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional command
-1
As a foundation, we are optimized to support delivery of open source
code, it seems to me OOo and its user/community/the public would be
best served by an organization built for the delivery of a finished
end-user product. OOo would be such an anomaly for us I fear would
lead to an embarrassin
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
> proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator.
>
> The latest proposal can be found below, or in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/i
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
>
> The l
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I would like to propose DirectMemory, a Java OpenSource multi-layered
> cache implementation featuring off-heap memory storage (a-la
> Terracotta BigMemory) originally developed by Raffaele P. Guidi on
> GitHub[1], to be an Ap
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
>> wrote:
>>> IMO the champion helps clarify the incubator process up to acceptance
>>> of the podling into the incuba
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
>
> Th
Discussion seems to have waned and with an overall positive vibe - are
we ready to call the vote?
Thanks,
--tim
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I would like to propose DirectMemory, a Java OpenSource multi-layered
> cache implementation featuring off-heap
+1
--tim
On Sunday, October 2, 2011, Ashish wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> I'm now calling a formal VOTE on the DirectMemory proposal located here:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DirectMemoryProposal
>>
>> Proposal text copied
The "PMC Guide" page[1] seems to be redundant information with the
"Mentor Guide" page[2]. Is there a reason for the PMC Guide to
remain? The reason I ask is, they're currently inconsistent (re: svn
auth) and - while the PMC Guide appears correct - I found the Mentor
Guide more helpful.
Thanks,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>> Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going
>>> to be hard to get this release out !!!
>>
>> If by community you mean the IP
I wonder why the proposal template doesn't explicitly ask the
proposers about their belief in the Apache Way? It asks about
fascination with the Apache Brand and touch on it a bit in the
Alignment section. But being that one could easily be fascinated by a
brand from the outside even while not ag
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> Do you seriously expect any answer other than "yay of course" to such a
> question??
Hi Sanjiva,
Yes, as I'd expect the question to be open-ended.. "Why do you think
the Apache Way is a good fit for your project?" (or somesuch) In th
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1, happy experimenting!
--tim
-
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> I wish we had completed this discussion while subversion was still in
> incubation, while the subversion community could learn the common Apache
> terminology and have no need for translation of the terms.
>
> Instead, a suggestion to that
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache Isis.
... snipped
> == Source and IP Submission Plan ==
> As mentioned earlier, the NO framework is ASLv2 but copyright belongs to
> Naked Objects Group Ltd. NOGL is ha
so I'll defer on this one, it just caught my eye - my own
understanding is that contributors would need to be tracked down[1].
--tim
[1] - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 24,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Um, Well, maven still uses Codehaus JIRA that lacks the 'grant to
> Apache' checkbox. Perhaps they separately negotiate iclas.
Sorry, I can't speak intelligently about maven - hopefully, the Maven
PMC has another mechanism for performing
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On
> the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the
> other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of httpd.
> Everything at Apache is in
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> On 30/08/2010 07:26, Tim Williams wrote:
>>
>> Your proposal caused me to poke around the NO site and the first forum
>> topic I came upon[1] had someone providing a [simple] patch. This has
>> me curious about the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> The Isis proposal has now been updated with a champion and several new
> mentors (thanks again guys), and is ready to be voted on.
>
> The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal , the text
> is also copied below.
>
> Plea
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
> community has voted (see
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
> and would like to officially change our
I'm watching the "renaming" vote thread and I find it odd that folks
are -1-ing the project's vote. I've read the role of the IPMC[1] and
the policy[2] and can't find the basis for our (IPMC) doing anything
other than ack-ing they're vote. It seems like votes from the IPMC
should only be relevant
to
think through these things... in other words, the basis for us
challenging the vote is "trademark concern" rather than "I don't like
that name, it's too broad"...
... but I haven't seen a mark concern brought up...
--tim
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Ti
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:11, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 08:47, James Carman
>>> wrote:
>>> I haven't followed this particular issue because it seems like a
>>> sl
I might be missing it, but is there a link to the existing GPL project/code?
Thanks
--tim
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since the first call a few weeks ago didn't suceed (more mentors were
> asked), I would like to call a second vote for accepting the security
> inf
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> All,
>
> this vote will fail in three hours because nobody responds to it. Are
> there any objections against this proposal? Or why is this vote
> ignored?
Hi Christian,
I ignored it because it was odd to me that there's essentially no
+1
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sander W G van der Waal
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Sander
>
>> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org]
>> Sent: 08 November 2010 23:37
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator
>>
>> I am pleased to of
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at
> some point in the future.
>
> You use the phrase "committ rights" in this template. They are not
> "rights" they are "privileges". The reason this might be important is
> t
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Since the official vote cut-off date has passed, I'd like to gently
> remind that, with 6 "+1" votes from the community members we
> would be very grateful if somebody from the IPMC can take a look
> at the bits and give us the feedback.
H
Marvin says... "supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th)."
The December report[1] says... "reports are due here by the first day
of the month"
And the reporting schedule[2] says... "should have their reports ready
by no later than the second Wednesday of that month" (Wed,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams wrote:
>> Marvin says... "supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
>> (Wed, Dec 7th)."
>
> That's Incubator Marvin, who requires podlings to provide an extra week&#x
+1
--tim
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is
> time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on
> recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board.
>
> Please
Wrong year:)
--tim
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" for
> change notification.
>
> The "February2011" page has been changed by brianleroux:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Februar
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:08 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> Here are some of the things that guide me in my decision-
>> making about governance and Apache communities. Please
>> feel to add you own thoughts on the subject!
>>
>> 1) Fairness and Equitable Treatment- that it is
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>> From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above
>> effectively turned thi
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
> chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
> running
> have aligned beyond the following nominee: Jukka Zi
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: don't care
> -1: do not accep
+1
--tim
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would
> like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours has
> passed since the initial proposal.
>
> The proposal may be found at
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Rich, I note you mark your vote as non-binding.
>
> To be a champion/mentor you need to be an IPMC member. Since you are
> already an SF member you just need to ask and Jukka will sort it out.
For the archives... it's his Apache membership th
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:38 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 June 2012 13:12, wrote:
>> Author: twilliams
>> Date: Thu Jun 28 12:12:43 2012
>> New Revision: 1354971
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354971&view=rev
>> Log:
>> typo
>>
>> Modified:
>> incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/gr
Incubation is unnecessary process in this case. I don't see any reason
this should go through incubation.
--tim
On Saturday, June 30, 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
> of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serv
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> DirectMemory lacks only a release to be green across the launch control
>>> board.
>>
>> Looks like a rele
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> While the new move to push podlings towards graduation is
> something I'm happy to see, lately the quality of the tickets
> being filed with INFRA has hit new lows, bogging down the
> process considerably.
>
> I don't know if some docs have r
inkedhashmap - Apache 2.0 License -
> http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/
>
> == Cryptography ==
> none
>
> == Required Resources ==
> * Mailing Lists
>* blur-private
> * blur-dev
>* blur-commits
>* blur-user
> * Subversion Directory
The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP.
We began incubation in October 2011 and have demonstrated our ability
to function according to the Apache Way. We've successfully made a
release. We have begun to grow the community. We didn't hold a
separate formal vote - i
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP.
> We began incubation in October 2011 and have demonstrated our ability
> to function according to the Apache Way. We've successfully made a
> release.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
>> The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP.
>> [...]
>> Please VOTE to submit the below resolution to the board fo
With the following votes, this vote passes. I'll submit a suggested
resolution to the board shortly. Thanks everyone who voted and
supported the DirectMemory community through their incubation...
+1's Binding:
- Tim Williams
- Olivier Lamy
- Jean-Baptiste Onofre
- Jukka Zitting
- D
Hi Otis,
Nice! yeah, we're bootstrapping now... join us on blur-dev@i.a.o and
blur-user@i.a.o
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/blur.html
The ticket's in now to get the git repo up too.
Thanks,
--tim
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the word on Blur
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:30 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> >
>> > Clutch is an invaluable tool, but with some coloring issues according
>> > to me: the current coloring schema is not well suited to alert me, or
>> > they alert me
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:09 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>> Tim Williams wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi David,
>>
>> Nice to hear from you Tim.
>>
>> > I suppose you can't please everyone, but the r
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>> On 10/12/2015 10:10 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>>
>>> Regarding inactive mentors, this is quite simple : we have a monthly
>>> report that has to be signed off by mentors, if one mentor
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> But - and I wanna be very clear that this is a hypothetical - if I were to
> still have significant concerns (either ones that weren't addressed in the
> DISCUSS thread or I missed the DISCUSS thread, etc), it'd still be socially
> permissible
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/12/2015 10:10 AM, Emma
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> It isn't OK. It may have to happen, but it isn't really OK.
Looks like this got written, but I'm not sure why such an unforgiving
stance - this happens fairly often on TLPs and the board is always
gracious and understanding.
Thanks,
--tim
--
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Markus Geiß wrote:
> Hey Pierre, James, Jim
>
> thanks for your interest in mentoring, we will talk about that with our
> current mentors to see what will be a good number of overall mentors for
> the project.
Prolly your mentors will say that if Jim offers to help
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I'm replying top of thread as this is a general reply regarding mentors.
>
> We just added Greg Stein as a third mentor. He wasn't on the originally
> submitted proposal as he was just checking on availability before confirming.
>
> Based on
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Nobody is turned away.
Jedi mind tricks won't work on me Ross:) When someone says, "We are
not seeking more." it is the same as being turned away.
For the rest of it, I reckon we'll have to agree to disagree. The
bottom line is, someone [J
> How has the project developed since the last report?
> >
> > - The software has a few additional features, and bug fixes.
> >
> > Date of last release:
> >
> > 2014-07-29
> >
> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> >
>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> It was recently pointed out that some of our docs are a bit inconsistent
> around who can champion a candidate podling.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
> http://incubator.apache.or
is this just personal catharsis?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell
> wrote:
>> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC
>> of the sponsor.
>>
>> I’d expect the Champion to subscribe to the
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
>
>> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or
>> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold".
>
> Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substantive.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Mike,
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of
>> > branding: http://trafodion.apache.o
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> The board is concerned that we have incubating projects that have been
> around for many years.
>
> What is the sense of the incubator about this issue.
Maybe just tell the board to put away the scalpel? It's not an
instrument that suits them
+1
--tim
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>>http://s.apache.org/Dk7
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting HTrace
>> as a new incubator project.
>>
>
+1, good stuff...
--tim
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
>
> In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the
> proposal can be found here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal
>
+1, best wishes... based on revision #25[1]
--tim
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal?action=recall&rev=25
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer thi
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
