On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/12/2015 10:10 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >>> >>> Regarding inactive mentors, this is quite simple : we have a monthly >>> report that has to be signed off by mentors, if one mentor does not sign >>> it three time in a raw, shouldn't we consider that this mentor has >>> already stepped down ? >> >> No, it's not simple. Actively removing people from volunteer roles is much >> more complicated than you might suppose. I'd rather focus on making myself a >> better mentor than any measures against other mentors which might be seen as >> punitive. > > Getting some things out of the way: > > I agree that it is not simple. I agree that it is complicated. I > disagree that it needs to be viewed as punitive. I suggest it would > be worthwhile to do. I respect that this may not be something you > personally would want to volunteer for. I believe that you can't fix > what you don't measure. I acknowledge that measuring may lead to > gaming, though in this case I think the rewards are so vanishingly > small that that is unlikely to be a major issue. > > Whew! > > Now on to the substance of my reply: > > https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/signoff
Hi Sam, A small request - any chance you can adjust the colors for that page? David added some notes to Clutch[1] for details but I reckon #009e73 and #d55e00 would be better. Thanks, --tim [1] - http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#notes-cud --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
