How can I get involved?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps since the traffic on this list isn't too large, you can post a "How
to Help Out" every day, or every other day.
Or what about putting it on the footer of the mailing list?
So add the line I marked:
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
lready a process in place - I'm new :)
cheers,
Rob
On 21 Dec 2005, at 15:18, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:50:28AM -0800, Ted Leung wrote:
The merits of the particular proposal aside, I wanted to comment on
this paragraph. This year at ApacheCon I was surprised to fin
+1 Release the binary as 4.0-M4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
On 5 Feb 2006, at 21:03, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
We have received the generous donation of a complete and w
ote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
Because we care enough to have the debate. If anyone wants silenc
I'm not sure it's consensus - more a case of folks getting fed up
with the petty arguing and just want to get things done.
On 16 Feb 2006, at 08:54, Matthieu Riou wrote:
I'm really glad to finally see a consensus emerging!
Matthieu.
Bill,> It seems everybody has exhibited a willingness to
- but need to
have two or three - can't we make that decision later ? I don't know
how the incubator is meant to work (still finding my feet) - but I
would have thought the incubator would be able to work this way.
cheers,
Rob
On 17 Feb 2006, at 11:59, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
on my personal
profile I had to add my Apache email as an email address to my GitHub
profile
Rob
On 10/02/2014 15:03, "Sergio Fernández"
wrote:
>BTW, where is the mapping file between asf ids and github ones?
>I've seen some members of the apache organization there, but it looks
We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
We're now looking for review and approval by the IPMC.
Rega
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi Rob, the result Vote within PPMC [1] did not indicate mentor Vote.
>
> Is there any mentor Vote in favor within ODF dev list Vote thread?
>
No, there were no votes from mentors. That's one of our problems,
lack of ac
ders.
>
> Nothing to block this release.
>
> +1 (binding IPMC)
>
Great, thanks!
-Rob
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Henry Saputra
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob, the result
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
>
> We'r
it I would be
willing to help out with a POC
Cheers,
Rob
On 31/03/2014 01:52, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>Hi!
>
>a few recent discussions around IP management
>in the Incubator have lead to an interesting dialogue
>between the fine folks from Black Duck Software and
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> I'll upgrade my vote to +1 (binding)
>>
>> That gives us two +1's from the IPMC. Need one more to release.
>>
>> I realize many are bus
sufficient?
Thanks,
Rob Vesse
Voting Process
This majority vote will run for 72 hours. Votes cast by members of
the Incubator PMC are binding.
Regards,
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> The process is described here:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Yes, to pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the Alternate
> Release Voting Proce
we're unable to move forward, since
that requires Mentor sign off on the release manifest/checklist.
I am able and willing to help here.
Regards,
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
RC4 for the ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating release is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~robweir/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating-RC4/
We'r
applies. If no -1
votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
Thanks,
Rob
With no objections the vote passes by lazy consensus
Thanks,
Rob
On 22/05/2014 12:12, "Rob Vesse" wrote:
>Cray is proposing to donate a set of libraries called Hadoop RDF Tools to
>the Apache Jena project - the details of the code base can be viewed at
>https://issues.apa
Including the earlier PPMC phase of the vote (noted in the release
manifest [1]) we have a total of 4 binding votes:
+1 PPMC Oliver Rau (olira)
+1 IPMC/PPMC Rob Weir (robweir)
+1 PPMC Svante Schubert (svanteschubert)
+1 IPMC Justin Mclean (jmclean)
No other votes were received so the release is
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> No other votes were received so the release is approved.
>
> Congratulations, and many thanks to the Apache ODF Toolkit podling for
> sticking it out throug
required a lot
of bug fixing before it was ready for GA.
3) The SGA'ed code had a good number of copyleft dependencies that had
to be replaced, as well as other unique things (at the time) that
required review on legal-discuss.
4) Our priority (even over a rel
ere:
http://markmail.org/message/yuentl3tzc3o3i3v
Regards,
-Rob
> Only there was a release announcement about 3 weeks ago for
> 0.6.1-incubating:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201406.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogYbfCPx%2B7cfp6GEM%2BkOXa-xeT3rE6cd
hat would be much more murky as to who they are acting for and may
indeed have legal implications for the ASF
Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
o I am able to fill in the Apache ODF
> Toolkit project podling report?
>
Anyone?
Thanks!
-Rob
> Thanks,
> Svante
>
> 1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2014
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe
help bootstrap the community?
Rob
On 15/07/2014 03:16, "Selvamohan Neethiraj"
wrote:
>Apache Argus Proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal)
>
>== Abstract ==
>
>Argus is a framework to enable, monitor and manage comprehensive data
>security across the
ake is that
> both project don't move the output in the output directory of the
> module. That is the default behaviour in all modules, generated output
> during the build process goes into the module output directory.
>
Or said otherwise, these two JAR's are built from
mpare the results.
I'd bet any amount that all four NOTICE files will differ in
substantive ways, and that there would be disagreement, both within
the groups, and across the groups, on which was "correct".
-Rob
> Just trying to help here, so no flak my way please :-)
>
> BTW, I th
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>> On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>> On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
>>>>
elease, with only a handful of carefully reviewed
patches, and that since AOO 3.4.0 was thoroughly reviewed and
approved, that we could concentrate our effort on reviewing the delta
between the two releases. Of course, if we do this we'll never find
pre-existing errors, and it is clear now t
The community vote has passed.
Vote reference: http://s.apache.org/5GA
+1
RGB-ES
Rory O'Farrell
Carl Marcum
Reizinger Zoltan
Keith N. McKenna
Kay Schenk
Roberto Galoppini
Imacat
Andrea Pescetti
Regina Henschel
Graham Lauder
Jürgen Lange
T.J. Frazier
Rob Weir
Dave Fisher
Peter Junge
Chri
only to AOO, but to other podlings
and to TLP's as well.
Until that happens, I hear only opinions. But opinions, even widely
held opinions, even Roy opinions, are not the same as policy.
-Rob
>> OTOH I don't think anybody said the ASF will never allow projects to
>> distribut
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> Returning to this topic after an intermission...
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, A
etc., that are provided for the convenience of the user.
These non-source artifacts must must be buildable from the canonical
source artifact. Additional 3rd party libraries may be included
solely in compliance with license policies defined by Apache Leg
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> Or if someone who cared sufficiently about this policy area took
>> ownership and proposed a wording of the policy, either as a Board
>> resolution, or on legal-
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> I can give the IPMC a hand here, if my point is too obscure. A policy
>> might look like this:
>>
>> Resolved: An Apache project's release consists o
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.08.2012 13:15, Tim Williams wrote:
>> Marvin gave the link earlier in this thread. 4th para is the relevant bit.
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>
> The relevant part is in the last paragraph. However, that says
> "conv
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>> AOO doesn't need to change anything to their current release processes
>> other than to stop pointing source downloads at svn (which is the sole
>> reason I won't vote for AOO candidates).
ved by the PMC's
2) distributed on Apache mirrors
3) linked to as ASF products by project websites
4) accompanied by PGP/GPG detached signatures
...what additional liability do we believe comes from the
technological change from one signature mechanism to another? O
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:56 AM, wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote on 08/27/2012 08:43:35 AM:
>
>> From: Jim Jagielski
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org, Joe Schaefer
>> , Rob Weir ,
>> Cc: "ooo-...@incubator.apache.org"
>> Date: 08/27/2012 08:
ect. We don't
> know everything. But we *do* deserve consideration to make things Right.
> AOO is an awesome opportunity or us all, and we should do what we can for
> their success. It must happen with an old, and with a new, community
> w
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue.
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56
ir identity, in their iCLA [1]. But
the form also allows them (optionally) to indicate an additional
"public name", essentially a pseudonym they use on the mailing lists,
etc.
-Rob
[1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>> Begin f
n June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
> and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
> mentors for the project?
>
An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome.
Regards,
-Rob
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
>
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on t
code and core
code modifications to exist, and there are indeed "real users" in this
ecosystem who thrive on such extensions.
Regards,
-Rob
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
>
> ---
ry is
>> f505f7c607098cdd77797417485584**49918b0b45
>>
>> The changes can be found at here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.6-**
>> incubating-rc4/CHANGES.txt<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.6-incubating-rc4
>
>
> Thanks, so far I got the impression that the most important place to put my
> key is at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/
> I am not sure yet how to upload files to the dist folder but I'll figure
> that out.
>
> As those cha
alternative to the MS/Oasis OData standard.
Rob
On 6/17/13 8:35 AM, "Klevenz, Stephan" wrote:
>Dear ASF members,
>
>We would like to propose the OData project to the Incubator.
>
>The OData Proposal is available at:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal
>
in your timezone may arrive in the middle of the
night for the recipient(s) so be prepared to wait for a response.
I think those of us who work in the US or for multi-national companies get
used to dealing with timezones and tend to forget that a lot of people
come from countries where there is onl
Could someone please grant me write access to the Incubator wiki
My username is RobVesse
Thanks,
Rob
discussing here
Rob
On 6/20/13 12:22 PM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>11. In certain circumstances, there are specific people charged with
>certain responsibilities. Over time you can expect to learn who they
>are, and where they hang out. Your mentor should be able to guide you
>
f you agree that Apache would be a good
location to further develop the ODF Toolkit libraries.
Regards,
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Thanks Rob,
>
> Looking I've the Kenai site I notice that there is as good as no visible
> activity within the project. You mention that the "ODF Toolkit Union Steering
> Committee" met and approved the idea
is list a few weeks ago. If you find the
Java libraries to be interesting but not the .NET library, then that
would be good to know.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comm
Hi Dennis,
If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
NOTICE document. This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
REMOVE". I imagine they would even tear off those tags on mattres
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
>> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a singl
Passing along, from the ooo-dev list.
-Rob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jürgen Schmidt
Date: 2011/6/28
Subject: Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal
To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
Hi Rob,
i support your idea and i think that it make sense to move the ODFToolkit
project
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
>> >> Hi Dennis,
>&g
And I was thinking of the Ray Ozzie, the former Microsoft CTO.
Elephant handler is perhaps apt.
-Riob
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:22:39AM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> You might want to reconsider the name.
>>
>> In English (British Engli
ucket. So our plan will be to propose moving
only the Java components over to Apache,
Also, we just announced a new release (more info below) and are
starting work on our next release, which is targeted to add support
for document encryption and digital signatures.
Regards,
tifications
===Other resources===
A source code repository, preferable git
An issue tracker
A wiki
A website
==Initial Committers==
Rob Weir
Biao Han
Svante Schubert
Ying Chun Guo
==Sponsors==
===Champion===
Sam Ruby
===Nominated M
And I've added it to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
-Rob
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Apologies to those who have received multiple copies of this message.
> I've cc'ed members of the Apache POI project, the Apache Ope
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> And I've added it to the wiki:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
>>
>> -Rob
>
> What can I do to help?
>
Good question. Once the project is set up, there will
eir ID's will require some care.
> 4. Can we know the contact e-mail and current iCLA status of the initial
> committers?
>
Yes, we can work on that.
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
>
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown
>>> wrote:
>>>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>> And I
2011/7/22 Jürgen Schmidt :
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
>> >
>> >> Rob Weir wrot
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
>
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown
>>> wrote:
>>>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>> And I
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
>>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>> And I've added it to the wiki:
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitPropos
tributors. But I want to be clear that
the ODF Toolkit project has a different audience than OpenOffice, and
the project will benefit from a different mix of skills.
-Rob
>
> Thanks,
> khirano
>
> -
>
@incubator.apache.org.
Regards,
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> +1 on the proposal
>
> But comment though on the mailing lists you asked for, I updated them,
> so would you please take a look. In brief the changes are:
>
> 1- You missed adding odf-private@ which is for Podling Project
> Management
gt;
> Please forward the proposal as you see fit.
>
> Meanwhile, I'm only seeing positive responses. If we call for a vote
> in 72 hours (late morning EDT on Thusrday) is that enough time for
> discussion?
>
Sam, I think we're ready for the vote now.
Thanks,
-Rob
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject ODF Toolkit for incubation
>
+1
Regards,
-Rob
-
To unsubsc
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>
>>> As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
>>> I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
>>>
t;initial committers" as well as
general@incubator.a.o, in the interest of transparency.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
er,
from the Incubation Project Management Committee (IPMC) who volunteers
to help the new Podling understand Apache and how it works.
You can read about Mentors (and other roles) here:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor
-Rob
>> Nick
>
ot;.
> The "yellow" line shows the "Total podlings currently in incubation".
>
> The growth of the yellow line is showing that we do have
> more podlings entering incubation than graduating/retiring.
> This is n
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:57 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> >
>> > Please see
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/history/
>> >
>> > This is a Timeplot chart of the number of projects
>> > handle
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2011 8:03 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: timeline of Apache Incubator h
e did run into with the OpenOffice podling. The issue was
related to character encoding and mailing list archives. The issue is
here:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52195
So depending on what language you are looking at, this may or may not
be an issue for you.
-R
ng this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating.
> The vote is open for the next full week, until Tuesday, Jan 3rd, 2012, 6pm,
> because of the New Year holiday and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1
> IPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OD
elease. The fact that ODF 1.2 was approved as an OASIS
Standard since our last legacy release is also important.
-Rob
> - Dennis
>
> ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY
>
> Console Session (line breaks added for readability):
> ---
>
> * MyMaven64.bat 0.02 64-BIT
ncubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ppmc-faqs.html#status
So, we edit the XML, ant, svn commit the changed XML and generated
HTML, then go to people.apache.org and svn update.
Does this just change the last step, so instead of an svn update on
people.apache.org we do the publish script? Or something
coded BOM. Just FYI.
>
> I don't see the Incubation disclaimer in either a dedicated DISCLAIMER file or
> the README. Also, the word "incubating" is not in the archive filename.
>
OK.
> Hope this helps as a start at least,
>
Yes, thanks.
-Rob
> Marvin Hump
ake the AOO folks go through
> several release candidates down the road, it would be nice to hear objections
> now.
>
Actually, we're updating this per your advice.
See, for example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/LICENSE?view=markup
-Rob
> Marvin Humphre
tream developer who is modifying only
unrelated Java portions of the source code would be required to compile the
native code on all platforms in order to create a package. (It would also
require the PMC to have rather elaborate build rituals to create that JAR,
since it would require that we shuffle libraries across multiple buildbots)
-Rob
think a lot of this stems from the fact that the documents tend to
> describe processes and procedures without providing the underlying
> rationale.
>
>
+1 That is the key observation. We need more principles, agreed on and
documented, than we need more policies and rules.
For example,
ey would like to contribute, but
whose current analysis suggests that the Apple terms are incompatible.
-Rob
> Ross
>
> On 30 March 2012 12:10, seba.wag...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we would like to build a client prototype for Apache OpenMeetings for the
&g
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/31/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of
>>> projects wanti
ng new podling applications. It should probably be
treated explicitly in the wiki proposal for podlings that expect to
take more than 3 or 4 months to get to their first release.
Regards,
-Rob
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---
including you -- has ventured to raise a finger to improve any
of the patch materials.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> @Rob,
>
> In fact, I posted to ooo-dev and ooo-users information on the significance of
> the vulnerability and ways to mitigate it.
>
Yes, after the official security bulletin went out to those same lists. T
stolen iPhones.
Because of accidentally forwarded emails. Because of accidentally
typed recipients.Because of 4am's and because shit happens. It
will never make sense to share such sensitive information more broadly
than needed to deal with the actual security issue. This i
e reviews we've done have found and addressed many
issues. It is far better than doing nothing. In the end, I'll take
diligence over negligence any day.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
The Apache OpenOffice Podling Project Management Committee is pleased
to announce the release of Apache OpenOffice 3.4, available on
Windows, MacOS and Linux.
Downloads are available at: http://download.openoffice.org
The full release announcement can be read here:
http://www.openoffice.org/news/
e along with the post title. Se here:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/114598373874764163668/posts/ZiRcwog5cDJ .
If you try to fix it in the content itself, then you end up with
suboptimal results for Google+ and other places that do bring the blog
titl
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
