On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I've been aware of Guacamole for several years. Definitely keen to see it
> join the ASF.
>
Thanks, Noel!
I've been keeping the rest of the guac team apprised of the overall
response here, and we're all pretty enthused to be bumping int
I went ahead and tried looking up the phonebook entries for each of
the current podlings[1], and something definitely seems amiss. Roughly
half are missing:
airflow
atlas
beam
cmda
fineract
freemarker
gearpump
geode
gossip
guacamole
horn
iota
mad
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:18 PM, wrote:
>
> ...
>
> AIUI, I'm able to be an informal mentor for any podlings of interest (hey,
> there Guacamole!) so I'll just kinda poke around with that for a while, but
> I'll also keep an eye out here for other stuff that comes up.
>
"Hey, Daniel!" - Guacamol
Hello all,
Does anyone here have any experience with using GitHub pull requests in a
code review workflow which leverages a podling's mailing lists?
Since things have only happened if on the mailing lists, it'd be nice if PR
activity could truly "happen" as well.
I'm specifically interested in c
On May 18, 2016 9:54 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> it's what we are doing at Beam.
>
> A PR submission result:
> - to a mail on the mailing list
> - to a comment in Jira (if the PR contains commit with issue ID).
>
How have you achieved this?
For Guacamole, we're seeing emai
On May 18, 2016 10:06 AM, "Steve Varnau" wrote:
>
> Infra can configure the github to mailing list & github to JIRA for you.
>
> In trafodion, we have all github PR and comments going to a codereview
mail
> list
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-trafodion-codereview/
> So there
On May 19, 2016 10:30 AM, "Gino Bustelo" wrote:
>
> I write this to start a discussion about the "One release constraint"
> placed on Toree and what I feel is an unreasonable constraint on a project
> that is undergoing incubation. A brief background first...
>
> In Toree we have an LGPL dependenc
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
>
> > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer"
> or
> > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold".
>
> Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substan
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote:
>
> ...
> >
> > Spirits can be hard to grasp. As I suggested before. If being
> > prescriptive is too difficult, then force new podlings into a
> standardized
> > web template that meets re
this helps with the discussion.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gunnar
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Mike Jumper
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
>
Hello,
I'm looking to add the current podling report for Guacamole, but lack write
privileges. Can write access be granted for the user "MichaelJumper"?
Thanks,
- Mike
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> ...
>
> ===
> Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
> or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
> distributed with this work for additional inform
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Why? It would be perfectly fine for PG project to include, lets say an MIT
>> source code.
>
> That would be compatible with our license. But what if they included GPL or
> CDDL licensed software?
>
>> That's why I don't feel comfort
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> ===
>&g
Hello all,
We, Apache Guacamole (incubating), would like to migrate our project's
Docker images to something beneath the ASF, but I am unsure how to
proceed, nor the form that this migration would best take.
We currently have two repositories which provide Docker images:
incubator-guacamole-clien
On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
>
> If we agree on that, I see no problem with
>apache/incubator-foo
> naming of your *released* Docker ima
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>>
>> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
>> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
>>
>>
On Aug 29, 2016 8:30 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
> ...
> >> Note that there was a separate discussion focused on where is the right
> >> place for nightly/snapshot Docker builds to be deposited to.
> >>
> >> Sadly, that discussion bore no fruit :-(
> >>
> >
> > Was there? I would love to get
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> > On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> >>
> >> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
> >&g
On Sep 6, 2016 5:38 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Or, matching up with our (post-graduation) Git repo naming
> convention again:
>
> apache/guacamole
> apache/guacamole-guacd
>
> apache/guacamole:0.9.10-incubating
> apache/guacamole-guacd:0.9.10-incubating
>
> I think th
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
>
>> Is the project-specific organization option not really an option at all
>> then? Frowned upon for a TLP, and not to be considered by a podling?
>
> My chief
On Nov 3, 2016 00:02, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> it sounds like a good idea. I would allow "direct" communication between
the podling guys and the mentors/shepherd (to discuss release or report
content).
>
Wouldn't release/content discussion be best conducted on the mailing li
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
on this incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you clarify which of the release artefact are source releases.
>
Hi Justin,
The source artifacts are guacamole-client-0.9.10-incubating.tar.gz and
guacamole-server-0.9.10-incubating.tar.gz. The other artifacts are
convenience b
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
>> Would organizing the artifacts into separate "source/" and "binary/"
>> directories suffice?
>
> That seems like an excellent solution.
>
Excellent. Will do.
Am I correct in assuming that this is not a difficulty which blocks
further r
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:05 PM Mike Jumper
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Justin Mclean
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Would organizing the artifacts into separate "source/"
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:05 PM Mike Jumper
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Justin Mclean
>>> wrote:
>>> >
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER
> and NOTICE file.
>
>
Fair enough. Looks like we need to update EXTRA_DIST in the top-level
Makefile.am.
Also some files (for instance [1][2]]) contain the te
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> ...
>
>> Is the issue with DISCLAIMER and NOTICE the only issue you've found which
>> blocks this release?
>
> Yep they would be the only things I consider blockers.
>
OK. Sounds good then.
Thanks for taking the time to review, Justin. I'l
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER and
> NOTICE file.
>
Due to the issue noted above, this VOTE is canceled. We'll work to
address this in the next RC.
Thanks,
- Mike
I opened an issue in JIRA with Infra for this recently:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13103
My understanding so far is:
1) Some things were changed to work around emails being flagged as spam.
2) Those changes broke sending of automatic SVN emails.
3) Repairs partly fixed the issue
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
on this incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
> on t
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
> on t
The Apache Guacamole community is proud to announce the release of Apache
Guacamole 0.9.10-incubating.
Apache Guacamole (incubating) is a clientless remote desktop gateway which
supports standard protocols like VNC, RDP, and SSH. We call it "clientless"
because no plugins or client software are re
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
On Jan 26, 2017 19:22, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
...
- client LICENSE is missing license for this file [1] (mostly likely BSD
but not 100% sure). Server LICENSE is fine. Can you fix this in the next
release.
Sure thing: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-186
Thanks,
- Mike
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:23 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> February 2017 Incubator report timeline:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
>
> Wed February 01 -- Podling reports due by end of day
> Sun February 05 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
> Sun February 05 --
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
&
The Apache Guacamole community is proud to announce the release of Apache
Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating.
Apache Guacamole (incubating) is a clientless remote desktop gateway which
supports standard protocols like VNC, RDP, and SSH. We call it "clientless"
because no plugins or client software are re
On Feb 19, 2017 8:01 PM, "Niclas Hedhman" wrote:
...
CatA licenses are CatA because they allow modifications on source and
re-license...
sublicense*
- Mike
ion that one is more/less than the other
license.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:19 PM Mike Jumper
wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2017 8:01 PM, "Niclas Hedhman" wrote:
>
> ...
> CatA licenses are CatA because they allow modifications on source and
> re-license...
>
>
> sublicense*
>
> - Mike
>
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:11 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I'll be up front - I have mixed feelings about the download page. I
> love the format, it works well. I dislike that you're linking to
> unapproved releases, but it does have a decent warning sign.
>
>
The release notes / downlo
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Does the license of autotools need to be included in LICENSE?
> >
> > Good question. Other projects that use it don't add to license INAL but
> > given the exclusion
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > > Does the license of autotools need
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable
> stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a follow
> up JIRA (run it by legal first, as I'm honestly curious). I suspect the
> ruling would be
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:03 AM Mike Jumper
> wrote:
> > ...
> > Thanks, John. We definitely won't move forward with altering the presence
> > of the ASF headers until we get a ruling from legal one w
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:14 PM Mike Jumper
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:03 AM Mike Jumper
>> > wrote:
>>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
> t
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * Could build the client, but I don't have a setup to build the server
> * DISCLAIMER in every artifact
> * Sufficient LICENSE & NOTICE files. Even in the WAR! Good job :)
> * Commits exist in SCM
> * Sigs/xsums OK
>
> In the f
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Mike Jumper wrote:
>
>> * guacamole-auth-header includes some copies of ALv2 and mentions in your
>>> > LICENSE file. You only need to propagate the copyright notice here,
>>> not the
>>> > l
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
> t
The Apache Guacamole community is proud to announce the release of Apache
Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating.
Apache Guacamole (incubating) is a clientless remote desktop gateway which
supports standard protocols like VNC, RDP, and SSH. We call it "clientless"
because no plugins or client software are re
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Please note that Cat X licenses are deemed to be incompatible with Apache
> License, insofar that they are viral in nature, and FSF has made a claim
> that dynamically linked languages, such as Java, forces the virality to the
> dependent p
On Apr 11, 2017 17:29, "Niclas Hedhman" wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
>
> Even in the case of the GPL, my understanding is that the virality takes
> hold upon linking (at build time), not upon referencing the API via an
> import, inclu
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>>
>> So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable
>> stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - server and client's LICENSE and NOTICE good (although Autoconf had me
> concerned for a second there)
> - no unexpected bin
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote o
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote o
The Apache Guacamole community is proud to announce the release of Apache
Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating.
Apache Guacamole (incubating) is a clientless remote desktop gateway which
supports standard protocols like VNC, RDP, and SSH. We call it "clientless"
because no plugins or client software are re
On Aug 31, 2017 11:21, "Julian Hyde" wrote:
After downloading artifacts, there are 3 things to check: (1) the download
is successful; (2) the artifacts were indeed created by the named author;
and (3) the artifacts have not been tampered with.
A security expert would know to use the .md5 for (1)
FYI, the community vote for graduating Apache Guacamole as TLP has now begun.
Thanks,
- Mike
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Jumper
Date: Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Guacamole as TLP
To: d...@guacamole.incubator.apache.org
Hello all,
Given
wrote:
> +1
>
> Best regards
>
> Pierre
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 at 14:55 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > (forwarding my vote here)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 10/25/2017 06:15 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
houghts?
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:38 PM Mike Jumper wrote:
>
> > I'll gladly copy these votes onto the guacamole dev@ list when the result
> > is called, but beware that this thread is not the VOTE thread. This is the
> > thread notifying the incub
y below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Guacamole
Project:
* Carl Harris
* Daniel Gruno
* Frode Langelo
* Greg Trasuk
* James Muehlner
* Jean-Baptiste Onofré
* Jim Jagielski
* Mike Jumper
:
Jim Jagielski
Coty, Inc.:
Nick Couchman
Glyptodon, Inc.:
James Muehlner
Mike Jumper
OS3 Consulting LLC:
Nick Couchman
Quenda:
Daniel Gruno
Skytap:
Frode Langelo
Talend:
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Plan
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:37 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For the proposed PMC, could you share what the corporate affiliations are?
> >
>
> To the best of my knowledge/research, the cor
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The Guacamole PPMC has discussed [1] [2] and voted to graduate to TLP.
> Prior to calling the IPMC vote, we would greatly appreciate review and
> feedback on our proposed resolution, which can be found at the b
* Carl Harris
* Daniel Gruno
* Frode Langelo
* Greg Trasuk
* James Muehlner
* Jean-Baptiste Onofré
* Jim Jagielski
* Mike Jumper
* Nick Couchman
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mike Jumper be appointed to
t
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Guacamole community has discussed [1] [2], voted on, and
> approved a resolution to graduate to a top-level project. The draft
> resolution has since been given to the IPMC for review an
Hello all,
I recently updated the Guacamole podling status page [1] to reflect its
graduation:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1815410
The following morning, I verified that the changes deployed automatically,
and all was well. Later that day, however, the changes mysteriousl
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:06 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 December 2017 at 13:52, John D. Ament wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > At the same time, if we're saying we want to limit the creation of user@
> > lists, if a podling is already established and using forums, discourse,
> > slack, google groups, etc, do w
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 December 2017 at 18:57, Mike Jumper wrote:
>>...
>>
>> Speaking as a member of a recently-graduated podling that joined the
>> Incubator with an established user base, I think we would not have
>> done as well
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> ... It’s probably harder and not as fun as the logo game ...
>
>
I'm not sure anything can as hard as the Apache Lucene question in the logo
game:
https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheLogos/blob/84a740914a7ea55c27875dbd83900a1c3c1d97a2/res
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:07 PM, SHUANG SU wrote:
> Thanks, Justin,
>
> I think I should remove the jar about rat from the artifact, and then
> there is no binary code anymore.
>
> But I am puzzled about the definition of the term "compiled code".
> Generally, the JavaScript code does not need t
77 matches
Mail list logo
