On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:05 PM Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Justin Mclean
>>> <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Would organizing the artifacts into separate "source/" and "binary/"
>>> directories suffice?
>>> >
>>> > That seems like an excellent solution.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Excellent. Will do.
>>>
>>> Am I correct in assuming that this is not a difficulty which blocks
>>> further review of the release?
>>>
>>
>> Another way to look at it - given peoples availability, is there something
>> that can be done to make the review of the release easier?
>>
>
> I definitely have no problem with making things easier, but updating
> the directory hierarchy of the release artifacts will temporarily
> break the links in the draft release notes until they, too, are
> updated.
>
> If that won't derail the review effort already underway, I'll gladly
> take care of this.

OK - the directory hierarchy has been updated, and the links within
the release notes have been updated as well.

Source artifacts:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/guacamole/0.9.10-incubating-RC2/source/

Convenience binaries (built from guacamole-client only):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/guacamole/0.9.10-incubating-RC2/binary/

There are no convenience binaries for guacamole-server.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,

- Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to